Request For Full Transcripts – For some reason they didn’t want all the Judicial Misconduct in the appeals? Prosecutorial, Judge, and Defense Attorneys

Posted: October 23, 2025 in Community Mobbing

Prior Illegal Arrests and Evidence of Coordinated Judicial Entrapment

The events in my current case are not isolated—they follow a longstanding pattern of judicial intimidation, deceptive legal tactics, and abuse of due process, as demonstrated by incidents going back to at least 2017 and 2013.

In one such case, attorney Richard Barnwell, an African-American lawyer from the Johnny Cochran Law Firm representing me, told me to wait outside the courtroom during check-in. He later informed me the case had been dismissed—only for me to find out later that he never officially checked me in, leading to a warrant being issued. This was after I had paid him for representation. This type of bait-and-switch behavior not only sabotaged my legal standing but also reveals how almost all, defense attorneys I’ve hired, and even public defenders, have acted in coordination with systemic abuse.

This also reflects broader hostility from certain communities—including a misplaced narrative that traces back to an incident when I was eight years old, after kissing a Black girl. Instead of seeing childhood innocence, this moment was used as a bizarre origin point for what has evolved into widespread social and legal targeting, magnified by family betrayal and cultural manipulation. Which stems from my own family.

The hostility escalated with threats from individuals like Mike Huntley, who openly stated:

  • “We are using the judicial system against you,”
  • “You’d better live a careful life,” and
  • “Have a good life now.”
  • Singing “World of Paranoia”

While placing materials on my desk in front of me, referencing psychological warfare operations such as How to make people in South Korea mentally ill to control or eradicate, suggesting these were not jokes or pranks but part of a systematic psychological control framework used to target and destabilize individuals. These statements and materials demonstrate clear motive and premeditation, showing that this has never been about justice—it’s about erasure.

What I have since uncovered is that this operation includes a network of government, police, civilian vigilantes, and psychology professionals which is now worldwide, with roots going back to when I was five years old. What began with minor or fabricated incidents has become a global abuse campaign, coordinated across legal, community, and family structures, to discredit and destroy me under the pretext of mental health and legal justification.

What dirty little secrets, in the government are they trying to protect and cover up? What are they doing to people, especially children that they are “Afraid Of”?

Court of Appeal of the State of California

Second Appellate District, Division Four

Case No. B343120

The People v. Kevin Perelman

MOTION TO AUGMENT THE RECORD ON APPEAL

TO THE HONORABLE COURT OF APPEAL:

Appellant Kevin Perelman respectfully moves this Court to order supplementation and augmentation of the record on appeal in the above-referenced matter, and in support states as follows:

1. Incomplete and Deficient Appellate Record

The current reporter’s transcript provided for this appeal (B343120_CR_PERELMAN_RT.pdf) contains only the jury trial and sentencing phase (September 18 – October 1, 2024, and final sentencing). Upon review, I have determined that multiple critical pre-trial, pretrial conference, arraignment, preliminary hearing, and sentencing hearings and continuations are entirely missing from the appellate record, as documented by the trial court docket.

2. Request for Augmentation

Appellant requests the complete supplementation of all missing transcripts, including but not limited to:

  • Preliminary hearings/settings: 05/22/2024, 05/17/2024, 05/03/2024, 04/05/2024, 03/15/2024, 02/26/2024, 01/12/2024, 12/11/2023, 10/17/2023
  • Pretrial conferences: 07/15/2024, 09/06/2024, 06/05/2024
  • Arraignment(s)/plea settings: 08/28/2023, 09/13/2023
  • Additional sentencing/Nunc Pro Tunc hearings: 11/05/2024, 11/06/2024, 11/07/2024, 12/17/2024, 02/07/2025
  • Any and all other hearings or proceedings missing from the record, in both Department 122 and Department E.

I respectfully request official reporter’s transcripts for the following court dates in the above-referenced criminal case:

Date

Time

Type

Result

Location

Department

02/07/2025

08:30AM

Nunc Pro Tunc Order Hearing

Not Held – Other Proceedings

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

12/17/2024

08:30AM

Nunc Pro Tunc Order Hearing

Not Held – Other Proceedings

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

11/14/2024

08:30AM

Probation and Sentencing Hearing

Held – Proceedings

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

11/07/2024

08:30AM

Probation and Sentencing Hearing

Not Held – Continued by Court

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

11/06/2024

08:30AM

Probation and Sentencing Hearing

Not Held – Continued by Court

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

11/05/2024

08:30AM

Probation and Sentencing Hearing

Not Held – Continued by Court

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

10/01/2024

08:30AM

Jury Trial in Progress

Held – Proceedings

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

09/30/2024

08:30AM

Jury Trial in Progress

Held – Proceedings

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

09/25/2024

08:30AM

Jury Trial in Progress

Held – Proceedings

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

09/24/2024

08:30AM

Jury Trial in Progress

Held – Proceedings

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

09/23/2024

08:30AM

Jury Trial in Progress

Held – Continued by Court

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

09/20/2024

08:30AM

Jury Trial

Held – Continued by Court

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

09/18/2024

08:30AM

Jury Trial

Held – Proceedings

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

09/06/2024

08:30AM

Pretrial Conference

Held – Proceedings

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

07/15/2024

08:30AM

Pretrial Conference

Held – Continued by Defendant

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

06/05/2024

08:30AM

Arraignment

Held – Proceedings

Van Nuys West

Dept. – E

05/22/2024

08:30AM

Nunc Pro Tunc Order Hearing

Not Held – Other Proceedings

Van Nuys West

Dept. – 122

05/22/2024

08:30AM

Preliminary Hearing

Held – Preliminary Hearing

Van Nuys West

Dept. – 122

05/17/2024

08:30AM

Preliminary Hearing

Held – Proceedings

Van Nuys West

Dept. – 122

05/06/2024

08:30AM

Preliminary Hearing

Held – Continued by People

Van Nuys West

Dept. – 122

04/05/2024

08:30AM

Preliminary Hearing Setting

Held – Continued by Defendant

Van Nuys West

Dept. – 122

03/15/2024

08:30AM

Preliminary Hearing Setting

Held – Continued by Defendant

Van Nuys West

Dept. – 122

02/26/2024

08:30AM

Preliminary Hearing Setting

Held – Continued by Defendant

Van Nuys West

Dept. – 122

01/12/2024

08:30AM

Preliminary Hearing

Not Held – Other Proceedings

Van Nuys West

Dept. – 122

12/11/2023

08:30AM

Preliminary Hearing

Not Held – Other Proceedings

Van Nuys West

Dept. – 122

10/17/2023

08:30AM

Preliminary Setting/Resetting

Proceedings Heard

Van Nuys West

Dept. – 122

09/13/2023

08:30AM

Arraignment and Plea

Proceedings Heard

Van Nuys West

Dept. – 100

08/28/2023

08:30AM

Arraignment

Van Nuys West

  • Include both morning and afternoon sessions, if applicable.
  • If there are additional proceedings related to arraignment, settings, pretrial, or sentencing that are not in the appellate record, I request transcripts for those as well.

3. Specific Material Issue: May 22, 2024 Pre-Trial Hearing (Judge Marcus)

Of particular importance is the pre-trial hearing of May 22, 2024. Reviewing available audio, I noted that Judge Marcus stated:

> “My next move would be to force you out of your place.”

This statement may indicate judicial intent or bias, and is directly pertinent to claims of due process violations and lack of impartiality in the proceedings. The transcript for this hearing—and all other pretrial activity—must be included for the Court to meaningfully assess potential constitutional violations.

4. Systemic History & Ineffective Representation

This request is not made lightly. After three separate illegal cases and five attorneys—none of whom have raised meritorious claims regarding judicial and government misconduct or protected my rights with the required zeal—I am now compelled as a self-represented appellant to insist for the record that these omissions cannot be overlooked any longer. The repetition of failures by prior counsel, coupled with the filing of an opening brief without the full record or my input (while a conflict-of-interest motion was pending), makes full exposure of all misconduct a matter of record and constitutional necessity.

5. Necessity for Fair Appellate Review & Future Proceedings

A complete record is essential for this Court to review not only ordinary issues, but also to examine, as required by law, whether repeated constitutional breaches have been allowed at trial, during pre-trial, or in the selection of defense counsel. Only when every transcript—especially those evidencing potential bias or unfairness—is made part of the appellate record will meaningful review be possible, and future rights (including any habeas or federal review) preserved.

WHEREFORE, appellant requests that the Court order augmentation of the appellate record to include:

  • All missing transcripts noted above (and any others omitted),
  • With particular attention to the May 22, 2024 hearing and Judge Marcus’s remarks,
  • And provide appellant and current/future counsel time to review and supplement any appellate arguments as needed.

Dated: 10/21/2025

Respectfully submitted,

Kevin Perelman


26500 Agoura Rd, Ste 102

Calabasas, CA 91302

312-259-3686

A screenshot of a computer

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Declaration of Kevin Perelman in Support of Motion to Augment the Record

I, Kevin Perelman, declare as follows:

I am the appellant in this matter. The facts stated in the attached Motion to Augment the Record on Appeal are true and correct of my own personal knowledge. I make this declaration in support of my request for full augmentation of the appellate record, and I understand that this declaration is made under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State of California.

Executed on [Today’s Date] at Calabasas, California.

A signature on a white background

AI-generated content may be incorrect.

Kevin Perelman

Leave a Reply