How does one make someone into an obedient slave. They whip the victim to death, but the United States Government and Psychology Community Whip in ways to create the appearance of mental illness so they can get away with it.

Overview: A Lifelong Orchestrated Campaign Against Kevin Perelman

For nearly five decades, Kevin Perelman has been the target of a relentless, coordinated campaign of harassment, defamation, discrimination, and exclusion. What began as childhood hostility and labeling quickly evolved into an international network of group stalking, fabricated police reports, property sabotage, and ongoing attempts to provoke reactions to create a false public narrative. Law enforcement agencies, psychological professionals, legal system insiders, and organized community actors are all intertwined in these efforts—often exploiting rumors, stereotypes, and out-of-context incidents to justify ever-increasing persecution with no room for truth or honesty.

Whenever Kevin Perelman attempts to speak the truth or address the enormous damages to his name, reputation, and financial situation—or seeks accountability through lawsuits for defamation of character or discrimination—he is met with immediate LAPD and community retaliation. Oddly enough this retaliation also instantly goes across the Internet to the largest circles possible. This triggers concerted angry mobs determined to remove him from society and escalates the daily attacks, provocations, and setup attempts. Even news organizations, judicial employees here to defend, or civilly deal with damages, in unheard-of numbers and across the United States, seem committed to blocking any access to truth or accountability, all while allowing a barrage of minute-by-minute teases and provocations both online and offline from complete strangers.

These teases and provocations lack warmth, personality, or any open way to address them. They manifest as daily worldwide mimics, behavioral mockery (both visual and cryptic), persistent guilt-tripping, and subtle or overt hints that “you did this or that”—delivered through actions, gestures, or comments that cannot be rationally confronted, especially when coming from strangers or peripheral members of one’s social environment. This constant psychological pressure is designed to destabilize while preventing any meaningful avenue of response.

Adding another layer to the psychological warfare, there is an odd “Illuminati” personality trait tactic at the very end of this pattern. When Kevin tries to reach out or asks people to come forward, individuals often pretend not to know him at all. Yet simultaneously, they use subtle or cryptic behaviors and hints—through gestures, references, or behavioral mimicry—to signal that they do know him, but only in a way that can never be acknowledged openly or directly. This creates a gaslighting effect, reminiscent of a paranoia-inducing “Illuminati game,” where the ambiguity and denial are part of the strategy to further destabilize, isolate, or discredit Kevin, keeping him trapped in a cycle of doubt and confusion while wondering why he is even observing these strange conspiring coordinate behaviors. A method to create an illusion of obsessional looping by psychology community design.

The impact is severe: ongoing financial and reputational harm, inability to participate normally in society, Inability to have friends and relationships, emotional trauma, and an absolute denial of rights or protection. Every attempt at justice or a normal life is twisted into further proof of guilt, and every defense becomes just another excuse for ongoing persecution.

What follows is a detailed account of these patterns and incidents—from gaslighting and property attacks, to illegal police monitoring and legal manipulation—which together reveal the unprecedented, ongoing nature of this campaign. Kevin Perelman’s story is one of systematic and institutionalized injustice, perpetuated not by a single individual, but by an ever-rotating collective intent on silencing, isolating, and discrediting him no matter the truth or the cost to his life.

Terrence Scroggins and the Long-Running Character Attacks, Rotating Provocations, and Efforts to Remove Kevin Perelman from Society, and LAPD Cover-Up Operations – Defamation of Character

Terrence Scroggins fits squarely into the larger pattern of coordinated, sustained harassment against Kevin Perelman. Kevin spent years trying to avoid Scroggins and others connected to these conflicts, yet the stalking and mobbing never ceased. Greg Koenig told Kevin that Scroggins wanted to “beat [him] up” with their conspiring stalking groups, while Greg himself was caught on video vandalizing Kevin’s cars with rotating groups, resulting in hundreds of incidents from Greg Koenig alone from these rotating groups. Scroggins is also recorded saying: “That’s the man I want to kill.” This is just one of hundreds of videos documenting Terrence Scroggins’s activities within this globally incited campaign—a riot in which Kevin is not allowed to tell anyone or file police reports.

Such actions are clearly attempts to incite reactions and pose as victims in an ongoing, 26/49-year campaign of provocation—an exponentially growing network of gaslighting and psychological terror that began in 1977 and escalated in 2001 as Kevin became aware of its scope. Scroggins repeatedly approached, confronted, threatened, yelled at, and tried to intimidate Kevin over and over again. He confronted Kevin about disputed property accusations, told him he was not allowed to park on public streets or leave his residence, and worked with Charles Sean Dinse and community members, posting defamatory content on Facebook to cover up their ongoing crimes. Scroggins and his allies attempted daily provocations meant to push Kevin out of control or further intimidate him.

As is usual, Kevin Perelman has never been the aggressor in these situations—he has spent his entire life trying to avoid these setups—despite LAPD’s lifetime and worldwide fabrications, forged reports, and malicious intent in their investigations, which serve to dig a deeper hole if the real facts ever come to light. Scroggins appears in more than 300 recordings involving confrontations, threats, vehicle disputes, property conflicts, repeated approaches, censorship, and persistent efforts to escalate contact. Not one was instigated by Kevin Perelman. These recordings demonstrate that the Scroggins matter is not about a one-time disagreement or a single person; it is evidence of angry, incited mobs carrying on an unbroken campaign—like a 49-year forest fire that should be put out with water, not gasoline which starts from fiction, as the conspiring groups try to get reactions to reinforce the original lies as cover ups.

These recordings capture repeated confrontations before, during, and after trial. Over 70 videos show Scroggins trespassing onto Kevin’s property during the trial, throwing items around, and intentionally trying to provoke Kevin into some act that could then be reported to LAPD with his inside contacts to create fictional behavioral labels. The goal was to create reaction for the criminal justice system, without ever addressing the original instigation. Scroggins also pursued additional restitution by going to Kevin’s father’s office—a move that went beyond reporting a loss to include pressuring for personal money outside of the Judicial Process, making hostile accusations, and building the false appearance that Kevin was failing to comply, even when restitution issues were handled through court. This demonstrates that, at its core, the harassment targeting Kevin always involved a personal motive for gain before any police call was ever made—Scroggins’s personal hostility, in league with conspiring groups, is even visible in court documentation.

Statements used against Kevin include: “Kevin is an asshole,” “this is what I want,” “Kevin is crazy,” “this is what we want,” “Kevin looked at my car wrong, I want $1,000,” “I need to know what he does all day,” “We don’t like Kevin, he scares us—let’s instigate and provoke him so he is incarcerated for life,” “why is Kevin single—he’s weird; weird people aren’t allowed in our neighborhood,” “I don’t like Kevin buying that car, he doesn’t deserve it, let’s destroy them and make up lies to police,” or “Kevin’s Jewish, we don’t like Jewish people; they’re criminals and need to go to jail.” Motivations can be discriminatory, financial, or simply hateful, with little, if any, moral or ethical grounding.

Even in the middle of criminal cases, Scroggins came onto Kevin’s property over seventy times, displaying a consistent pattern since the day he moved in: throwing all over provoke reactions with LAPD, which could then be twisted by prosecutors. This is the entire pattern and tactic in less obvious methods all the way down to five years old. Defense attorneys frequently failed to see the relevance—that Kevin was being systematically hunted by police and community groups because an empty, absurd label followed him since he was five years old, met with ever-changing defamatory narratives that spread around the world. Video evidence of these attacks only appears to enrage the perpetrators further, rather than cause them to pause or admit what is actually happening. The problem is compounded at a judicial level—judges are aware of the reality but refuse to dismiss these cases in the interests of justice, knowing that powerful groups are exploiting legal loopholes to remove Kevin with the help of LAPD insiders.

One 2001 statement from a friend since 14 year old, and person who manipulated him back from University Of Colorado, Michael Patrick Huntley summed up this motive: “We are using the Judicial System Against you,” simply because someone with power was upset that Kevin might pursue a college degree or reach for a future he “wasn’t meant” to have.

Scroggins’s repeated demands for restitution—even after these matters were resolved in court—display both financial motive and underlying hatred, reinforced by community-wide hate from someone they’ve never met, out-of-context information campaigns. The pattern of escalating disputes, pursuing additional money, making hostile accusations, and fabricating probation violations all fed into the broader false narrative that Kevin was somehow dangerous, dishonest, or mentally ill.

The 2023 probation report contains statements like “Kevin is an insane asshole,” Detective Garcias Lies “absolutely crazy,” and claims that he “menaced other people” and should be placed in a mental health institution for the rest of his life. Or at all. This all reflects clear hatred and motive—coordinated with LAPD and mass groups replicating decades-old Perelman family patterns, rotating conspiracies spanning 49 years.

Amid all this, Kevin is forced, wherever he goes, to document his daily life, as he faces relentless provocations designed to trap, set up, or lock him away, and then cover it up with forged and fraudulent police reports. Predictably, any attempt to protect himself is twisted into accusations of paranoia—a classic cover-up technique. Mike Huntley’s early death threat in 2001—“World of Paranoia”—coincided with Kevin’s efforts to process and make sense of what was happening.

Importantly, Kevin has not harmed anyone—he has always been an exceptional person, just a human being who, like anyone, might have bad days or seem less pleasant at times. Still, the overwhelming majority of his actions and personality run counter to the defamatory global narrative, while his isolation only serves to suppress the truth of what has happened to him since 1977. He has been made into someone to watch and obsess over, with any demonstration of decency becoming a threat to those maintaining the narrative. The more Kevin resists this criminal system, the more threats and punishments are leveled at him, all to maintain the false façade for those behind the persecution.

His conduct—documenting stalking, asking questions, asserting boundaries, attempting to avoid confrontation, reporting incidents, and speaking in self-defense after being defamed—reflects every effort to resolve matters honestly, only to be met with new threats or greater hostility, so that the truth remains buried. Wider groups take self-defense, evidence collection, public objections, emotional reactions, and attempts to ask for protection, strip away context, and present them as proof of guilt or danger to the broadest possible circles. This pattern with LAPD, escalating from Kevin’s earliest childhood, has grown exponentially to a scale rarely, if ever, seen.

Greg Koenig, Vehicle Vandalisms, and Defacements

Greg Koenig has been involved in numerous incidents of vandalism and defacement of Kevin’s vehicles with these nonstop rotating groups and the next groups are told to take part wherever Kevin Perelman goes. Many of these incidents are on video, along with incidents involving other people in which LAPD refuses to document on any level showing what’s being done to his life.

For more than a decade, Kevin’s vehicles and property have been repeatedly targeted through:

Items placed on or around vehicles sometimes notes, sometimes hinting types of objects as references.
Objects or substances placed into gas tanks.
Attempts to jam windows shut.
Interference with vehicle components.
Vehicle defacement.
Vehicle tampering.
Vandalism and property damage.

Repair Shops and Vehicle Interference – Conduct designed to make vehicles unsafe, unusable, embarrassing, or expensive to maintain. Repair Shops and Vehicle Interference

Conduct designed to make vehicles unsafe, unusable, embarrassing, or expensive to maintain was not limited to visible vandalism or isolated damage. It also included persistent concerns involving repair shops and routine maintenance.

Kevin describes repeated situations where vehicle work was purposefully connected to provoking, intimidating, or destabilizing him: bolts or components removed, wires disturbed, fluids filled to incorrect levels, and repairs performed in ways that created new problems. Often, workers shared personal information about him. Especially what needed to be fixed, ways to sabotage whistling and calling him buddy at each and every shop over and over to instigate reactions of anger in hopes they could get something to call the police. And keep prolonging simple fixes linked to family members this is what happens when you go to auto shops, or this is the way the world works.

If a tire was put on correctly, Kevin was told he needed new wheels. Pattern would repeat itself, then move to the next set of shops.

If you talk about what one shop did, the next shop employee would start whistling as if you were a whistle blower. And this pattern repeat from shop to shop so you couldn’t tell them what to fix or what needed to be looked at to be repaired.

When Kevin asked how they knew about him, responses were often denial, anger, or hostility. This made otherwise ordinary vehicle maintenance another setting in which Kevin felt he had to remain guarded, document interactions, and defend himself against accusations that he was imagining what was actually occurring. Because what was occurring was attempts to try to escalate violence to remove from society.

The effects were broader than just vehicle damage. It interfered with his transportation, caused financial strain, limited his mobility, forced repeated repair visits, and made it easier for others to portray him as overreacting whenever he attempted to document or report what happened. Autoshops, Kevin reports, were told to instigate, vandalize, remove bolts or components, cut wires, fill fluids to incorrect levels, and would often act overly friendly or familiar with too much information, and usually that information was used to sabotage. If asked how they knew of him, workers would deny it, sometimes lashing out in anger or rage to create the illusion that Kevin was paranoid or schizophrenic.

Obviously, these tactics were not exclusive to auto shops; they were part of a wider strategy that often played out in in almost all public places. These incidents frequently occurred alongside public confrontations, threats, false accusations, efforts to provoke reactions, and sustained attempts to portray Kevin as unstable.

These incidents occur alongside public confrontations, threats, false accusations, efforts to provoke reactions, and attempts to portray him as unstable.

Kevin describes repeated situations where vehicle work was intentionally connected to provoking, intimidating, or destabilizing him: bolts or components would be removed, wires cut, fluids filled to incorrect levels, and repairs performed in ways that created new problems. Often, workers shared personal or case-specific information about him and his vehicles before ever going to the shops—especially about what needed to be fixed—using this knowledge to further sabotage his property. It was common for workers to whistle, call him ‘buddy,’ systematically from shop to shop or act overly familiar in each shop he visited, with the intent to instigate reactions of anger in hopes of being able to call the police, and to prolong simple fixes, often with hints connecting back to family members, as if to say, ‘this is what happens when you go to auto shops’ or ‘this is just the way the world works.’

If a tire was put on incorrectly at one shop, Kevin was told he needed new wheels at the next. The pattern would repeat itself and then move to a new set of shops. If Kevin mentioned an issue from a previous shop, the next shop’s employee would start whistling, as if to label him a whistleblower, making it impossible to advocate for proper repairs or communicate what needed to be fixed.

When Kevin asked how shop workers knew about him, responses were often denial, anger, or hostility. This turned otherwise ordinary vehicle maintenance into a setting where Kevin had to remain continually guarded, document interactions, and defend himself against accusations that he was imagining what was occurring, when in reality, there were coordinated attempts to escalate situations and ultimately remove him from society.

The ramifications were broader than just vehicle damage. These tactics interfered with transportation, caused financial strain, limited mobility, forced repeated repair visits, and made it easier for others to portray Kevin as overreacting when he tried to document or report what happened. Autoshops were told to instigate, vandalize, remove bolts or components, cut wires, fill fluids to incorrect levels, and usually acted with suspiciously detailed knowledge that was weaponized for sabotage. If he asked how they knew about him, workers would deny it and sometimes lash out in anger to create the illusion that Kevin was paranoid or schizophrenic.

Obviously, these tactics weren’t limited to auto shops; they were part of a broader strategy that played out in nearly all public settings. These incidents frequently coincided with public confrontations, threats, false accusations, calculated provocations, and ongoing efforts to portray Kevin as unstable.

Defining the Motive Behind the Tactics

A crucial part of understanding the relentless harassment against Kevin Perelman is acknowledging the narrative used to justify the treatment he receives. Common defamatory themes include: Kevin is seeking perfection; Kevin is never happy; Kevin suffers from obsession; Kevin is an asshole and doesn’t get along with people; Kevin thinks he’s the boss and believes he knows more than the mechanic; Kevin tries to control and tell others what to do; and Kevin is impossible to get along with because of his personality and behavior.

These are not isolated rumors—they are narratives disseminated to mass groups to rationalize every ensuing action. It doesn’t matter if Kevin is at a gym, a restaurant, taking a walk, sitting outside to get fresh air, in a pool hall, a college class, dating, with friends, or simply buying something at a counter. There is almost always a subtle instigation involved, designed to provoke and frustrate. And usually met with laughs, smirks, illuminati types of inner circle cultish behaviors as if I’m part of some bigger picture imaginary cult. And create the appearance of this, especially by LAPD.

For example, for a period of years, every time Kevin ordered a steak at a restaurant, it was deliberately prepared either extremely rare or extremely overcooked, even when he asked for it medium. These micro-aggressions and acts of passive aggression serve as signals to mass groups, demonstrating their coordinated passive resistance and provocation. The effect is cumulative and overwhelming: these tactics change and rotate so frequently that describing them can easily make a person sound paranoid or unstable to outsiders.

Another example: Kevin began to notice the same script at sandwich shops. At Subway, they would say, “All the veggies,” asking what to put on the sandwich. then the next time most likely, Kevin would say knowing their process, “All the Veggies” when they asked what to put on the sandwich. Then, when he started going to Jersey Mike’s or other sub shops, employees at each shop there—despite it not being Subway—and a lot of the shops would start repeating “All the veggies” as a mimic when preparing his sandwich to mimic the patterns over and over in hopes for reactions so they could call the Police. The script would travel shop to shop.

Around 2001, as Kevin was discovering more about this campaign, he began actively testing employee behavior at coffee shops across California. After paying, employees at most shops would grab his credit card and tap it twice on the counter—intentionally mimicking a specific, repeated gesture. If Kevin had any dialogue with an employee, the next business’s cashier—often using internet tools—would mimic fragments of his prior conversation at checkout. Kevin tested this by intentionally saying nonsensical things sometimes at locations to see how the information flowed and the rate of time it took to get to other locations, only to hear those same words mimicked or referenced at the next business. Sometimes they were interrogation style questions. Example, if he said something like “I think my computer was hacked”, the next employee at the next location might say something like “Do you think hacking is ethical or unethical”, or something eluding to the prior dialogue: As this continued, he began capturing video evidence—which only made LAPD more aggressive and angry with him. He drove from Laguna Beach to Oxnard, to the largest circles possible, to see if the same tactics would happen—and they did, systematically and consistently, as directed by police and the psychology community. The goal was to create a scenario where, if Kevin tried to articulate what was happening, it would sound off-the-wall or crazy to outsiders or people who aren’t aware of these methods to make people look crazy for whatever reason. However it appears that the real reasons situations of this type of complexity occur is from Government Operations like FBI Cointelpro, Stasi Zersetsum, Russian Punitive Psychiatry. One cannot know exectly what is going on without an honest dialogie about it.. Yet, in the Internet era, this orchestrated manipulation is not difficult to accomplish other than the use of fear to pressure people into participating in the conspiracy. The original lie often being: ‘He does these things to people, so let’s do it back to him.’ This is entirely by design.

Around 2001, as Kevin was discovering more about this campaign, he began actively testing employee behavior at coffee shops and other businesses across California. After paying, employees at a lot of shops would grab his credit card and tap it twice on the counter—intentionally mimicking a specific, repeated gesture. If Kevin had any dialogue with an employee, the next business’s cashier—often using internet tools—would mimic fragments of his prior conversation at checkout. Kevin tested this by intentionally saying nonsensical things at some locations to see how the information flowed and the rate of time it took to get to other locations, only to hear those same words mimicked or referenced at the next business. Sometimes, they were interrogation-style questions. For example, if he said something like, “I think my computer was hacked,” the next employee at the next location might say something like, “Do you think hacking is ethical or unethical?” or something alluding to the prior dialogue. As this continued, he began capturing video evidence—which only made LAPD more aggressive and angry with him. He drove from Laguna Beach to Oxnard and did this within hours to trace the rate of information flow, to the largest circles possible, to see if the same tactics would happen—and they did, systematically and consistently, as directed by police and the psychology community. The goal was to create a scenario where, if Kevin tried to articulate what was happening, it would sound off-the-wall or crazy to outsiders or people who aren’t aware of these methods to make someone appear crazy for whatever reason. However, it appears that the real reason situations of this complexity occur is from government operations like FBI COINTELPRO, Stasi Zersetzung, or Russian punitive psychiatry. One cannot know exactly what is going on without an honest dialogue about it. Yet, in the Internet era, this orchestrated manipulation is not difficult to accomplish, other than the use of fear to pressure people into participating in the conspiracy. The original lie often being: ‘He does these things to people, so let’s do it back to him.’ This is entirely by design. And the situations mentioned here are off the Internet, but they are far worse on the Internet. Emails, Forums, Messages on Social Environments.

A further example years ago: In Studio City Starbucks, Kevin was simply minding his own business and drinking coffee. A Black man approached another customer, pointed at Kevin, and told that customer that Kevin had supposedly been kidnapped and then kidnapped someone else. Kevin interjected, telling the customer not to believe the accusation and that it was related to tensions with the Black community because Kevin had kissed a Black girl when he was 8 years old, and this sparked racism towards him. The man then sat nearby and began whistling at Kevin, employing the whistling tactic as further provocation. The police know these tactics are in use, and in fact have enabled these angry mobs since Kevin was a young child. The police have been caught, even on video taking part doing them. Or almost every police report while going into the Police Station involves Police Officer instigation with similar tactics to provoke, to try to get reaction to create the appearance of instability for whatever reason they are doing it.

These ‘idea of reference’ tactics became especially apparent around 2008, after Kevin bought his father a watch for his birthday. And Ron Perelman’s anger over kindness. He began noticing repeated, subtle references at businesses to watches, ‘watch commanders,’ and related phrases, constantly hinting or prodding for a reaction—so they could claim Kevin was crazy. For example, an officer might say, “I will ask my watch commander” when questioning Kevin. Kevin’s father would say his favorite movie was ‘Hugo,’ referencing the movie poster where the character is on a giant clock. These patterns—constantly dropping coded references—would appear everywhere. Meanwhile, what was really happening in Kevin’s mind was simple: he was just trying to do something nice for his father and couldn’t understand why his father would react with psychosis, rage, random community members taking part with LAPD. Any attempt to ask for a direct explanation was forbidden and only met with more anger or hostility. These patterns define the deeper motive at work: Kevin is not allowed to be normal, stable, or simply himself. Instead, he he has to deal with the people trying to make him look crazy and their interpretation—by design—to become whatever the original campaigners decided their five-year-old target must be, regardless of the reality of his intent or innocence. The reason these mass groups are taking part is because they already have been given the disinformation and false narrative before Kevin approaches, and they are reacting based on the lies they are told. And every interpersonal communication is based on the poisoned well, without getting to know the person who he is. Also called poisoning the well.

The police are fully aware that this ongoing harassment and coordinated provocation are happening—and they themselves have actively taken part in it since Kevin became aware of the campaign in 2001 however they clearly were always involved because upon finding out people were lashing out in anger and rage at him, the Police became extremely enraged while filing Police Reports. Especially for the obvious things like car vandalisms, or death threats. Their participation demonstrates not only a lack of concern about the wrongfulness of these actions but a clear indication that they are directly behind it. Rather than intervening or providing protection, law enforcement has chosen to perpetuate and legitimize the tactics, sending a message of institutional endorsement for the systemic abuse directed at Kevin Perelman.

Even if they were powerless to do anything, they would admit to what is going on, and how it started to keep civilians safe. Not stalk them for finding out Like Detective Garcia, Officer Norris, and Charles Sean Dinse, that Kevin is Crazy, and we don’t know what he’s capable of or will do. This is the crux of the entire argument that starts around 1977 parents scapegoating, and projecting their own issues onto their child, Because the child in 49 years hasn’t done anything like they are doing.

Defamation of Character and the LAPD Cover-Up Pattern

Why is it that no matter what happens in life, it is Kevin Perelman’s fault, and nothing is ever looked at other then him. No matter how much HATE, no matter how much AGRESSION. No matter how many death threats, no matter how many psychical and mental attacks? Every single situation on every level must be changed, taken out of context, and twisted to be used against Kevin Perelman and given out worldwide.

Example, 1980 Sunny Skies Day Camp, Kevin Perelman kisses a black girl. The family and psychology community get angry for positive normal behaviors. The band Devo it brought in to sing “Whip It” Communities are told Kevin is a racist, antisemitic, filled with anger and rage, and needs to be removed from society. It of course later changes to some kind of analogy about coffee and black people, as if black people are coffee. These methods change from coffee to cars, from Pool Tournaments to sex, Computer Servers to Waitresses. As if a paranoid psychotic. schizophrenic doesn’t approve of Kevin Perelman’s behaviors like Paul Humphrey friend since 14, Working at LAPD in 1998, with Michael Patrick Huntley.

When Kevin finds out what they started Worldwide, Why would Kevin not be allowed to tell anyone or ask any questions about what’s going on, other then to the people waiting for the reaction to throw on pre-made labels at 5 years old already prepared?

This article presents Kevin Perelman’s account of a decades-long pattern of character attacks, privacy violations, stalking, public confrontations, threats, vehicle vandalism, institutional labeling, and law-enforcement inaction.

Terrence Scroggins is not an isolated person in an isolated vehicle-damage dispute. He is part of a much larger and longer history of a mass conspiracy and cover up operation involving family hostility, childhood threats of institutionalization, repeated public confrontations, vehicle vandalism, property interference, nonstop stalking with enormous groups of coordinated individuals, accusations, and efforts to portray Kevin as unstable while ignoring what has been happening for close to five decades.

The same labels have followed him for years: “crazy,” “asshole,” dangerous, unstable, problems with authority, public nuisance, behavior problem, mentally ill, in need of medication, in need of control, or in need of institutionalization. Yet nothing has happened other then unprecedented group provocations to instigate reactions to use as false narratives to get what they want.

These labels have been repeated without honest dialogue, specific explanations, or a fair opportunity to respond. He has been told that he is somehow doing something wrong while being denied any direct explanation of what the supposed wrongdoing is. While doing everything correct, and normal. And demanded unobtainable perfect behavior that doesn’t apply to anyone else.

At the same time, people approach him, insult him, threaten him, damage property, provoke him, escalate disputes, and try to create reactions on a daily basis exponentially growing since 1977. Those people are then treated as victims, while his response is isolated and used as the entire story. In courtroom where they want him, out of courtrooms, in social environments, in almost every public location. And POLICE and PSYCHOLOGY COMMUNITY mental illness label cover up operations.

The pattern is familiar: strangers or loosely connected people act as though he is supposed to know what he “did,” demand that he “pay,” and then provoke him through confrontations, rumors, intimidation, and group hostility. When he asks what is happening, he is met with hostility, threats, accusations that he is imagining it, and demands that he seek medication or institutionalization.

The result is an environment where there is no safe person to report to by design to create the appearance of mental illness out of hostility for him starting when he was very young, no normal avenue to explain what happened, and no meaningful distinction between the people initiating the hostility and the person trying to defend himself against it.

The 1977 Origin of the Empty Labels

The pattern did not begin with Terrence Scroggins, probation, vehicle disputes, or later court cases. It began around 1977, when Kevin Perelman was approximately five years old.

From the beginning, ordinary childhood behavior, personality, frustration, independence, or imperfection was treated as something that could be converted into a permanent negative identity. The labels changed over time—“crazy,” “dangerous,” “public nuisance,” “behavior problem,” “paranoid,” “schizophrenic,” “not rehabilitated,” or in need of medication or institutionalization—but the method remained the same.

No one would directly identify a real concern, explain what was wrong, or give Kevin a fair chance to respond. Instead, there was anger, pressure, hostility, secrecy, threats, humiliation, and demands that he somehow confess to unnamed conduct.

This is why later events cannot be treated as isolated. The same structure was already in place: create a negative label, circulate it, provoke a reaction, ignore the provocation, and then use the reaction as supposed proof of the original label.

Jason Perelman and the Early Institutionalization Threats

The theme of institutionalization became more direct around 1988, during the Calabasas High School years. It was during this period that Jason Perelman, along with his friends and others, threatened to have Kevin placed in a mental institution. At the time, this behavior seemed to be Jason trying to put on a tough-guy performance and intimidate. Much of the conflict centered on Jason’s anger at Kevin’s friend, Greg Waugh, because Jason’s girlfriend, Jennifer Yang, was cheating on him. When Greg arrived at their house in his 1968 Camaro, Jason approached with a raised crowbar. Kevin intervened, stepping in as a shield to protect Greg from potential harm.

After this tense moment, Jason launched into a speech about “blood being thicker than water,” telling Kevin that he needed to keep tabs on Greg and report back. Within the same timeframe, there was another odd statement: “We have a bug in your room, and we are listening to everything you do on the radio.”

At the time, the broader context behind these threats wasn’t clear. The pattern included psychological pressure, involvement from the psychology community and police, and use of the Perelman family’s psychology background as a tool—manifesting as repeated labeling, public hostility, defamation, daily provocations, and ongoing efforts to create the image of someone who should be removed from society.

He was focused on building a life, attending college, becoming independent, and moving beyond family conflict that he did not yet realize had become a larger campaign against him.

Ordinary adolescent behavior was treated as permanent evidence of bad character. A single argument with his mother at age fourteen—including the statement, “Fuck you, who cares what people think”—was seized upon as proof that Kevin was dangerous, mentally ill, or needed to be taught a lesson. This one imperfect incident was broadcast and labeled to the masses worldwide, branding Kevin as “an asshole” and equating this one adolescent moment to every aspect of his personality and interactions with others.

Comments like Ron Perelman’s—“You think differently”—were used to frame Kevin’s response as a fundamental thought process issue. His isolated statement was taken out of context, interpreted literally, and weaponized to suggest that he was fundamentally flawed for not conforming to the expectation that “most people care what people think.” Acts of friendliness and kindness were intentionally ignored, and instead, the narrative persisted that Kevin had a personality problem—based not on how he actually treats people, but on a freeze-frame of a single moment in 1988. This logic was stretched to justify the belief that every interaction Kevin had with any person, at any time, was him “being an asshole,” and therefore, justified coordinated mistreatment.

This principle was ruthlessly enforced: since the single disobedient act toward his mother, Kevin was subjected to abuse, ridicule, and psychological harm from almost every person worldwide. The justification became that his trouble with authority and a supposed problem with respect were grounds for ongoing punishment.

A deeper pattern emerges with figures like Terrence Scroggins—who is close in age to Kevin’s parents and a military veteran, as Ron Perelman was in the Air Force—demonstrating a generational and cultural reinforcement of this authority-driven narrative. The pattern: one moment of adolescent independence and perceived “disobedience” is used as a pretext for continuous, rotating attacks from worldwide strangers, all serving to keep Kevin in line and punish him into submission. Personal growth, normal mistakes, or change are never allowed; the single act is treated as lifelong proof of bad character and reason for ongoing abuse.

There was no room for imperfection, disagreement, frustration, personality, growth, or a normal emotional reaction.

In 2001, he was in complete shock at the realization that one imperfection, emotional reaction, personality trait, or private comment could be seized upon, transformed into a permanent negative identity, and circulated widely to turn people against him and provoke further reactions.

No one directly addressed concerns with him. If there were to be a discussion it would be about things that no one could care less about. No one explained the original event that supposedly upset them. No one gave him a fair opportunity to respond. Instead, anger, hostility, indirect statements, pressure, and efforts to invoke reactions took the place of normal communication.

The real unresolved issue was the Perelman family’s communication methods and the way anger was handled toward him, rather than any actual danger posed by him.

For example, Anita Perelman angrily told him in 2001:

“Go to a therapist and tell them EVERYTHING.” With a pre-prepared list of Co-Workers, or people she knew in the Psychology Community.

When he asked what she was referring to, the response was increased anger and hostility or avoidance, rather than any direct explanation. He was expected to somehow know what people were upset about while being punished for asking.

This created a situation where he was made to feel responsible for conduct directed at him, as though he should confess to something unnamed simply because other people were angry. But in reality, what they really wanted was coerced false confessions to cover up what they had started around 1977 with LAPD, and the Psychology community.

When specific complaints were eventually implied, they often involved trivial or childish matters that ordinarily would not concern anyone while being blown out of immense proportions, such as buying a comical T-shirt at a T-shirt shop in Oregon while attending college in 1991. This information is somehow WORLDWIDE with countless other out-of-context statements to rile angry mobs against Kevin Perelman with an agenda. Showing that a simple dialogue with someone is designed to be dangerous because they are collecting, restructuring, and disseminating disinformation with an agenda to remove from society out of hate.

Rather than discussing that directly and proportionately, it became material for wider character attacks.

LAPD personnel later implied that Kevin Perelman was causing hostile groups to stalk him because they did not like a T-shirt he bought in 1991, effectively suggesting that buying a comical T-shirt before the internet made him responsible for people across the United States stalking, confronting, or targeting him.

The same logic has been applied to almost every artwork and other ordinary behavior. Harmless actions are treated as the cause, while the actions of people approaching, provoking, threatening, defaming, harassing, setting him up, or trying to frame him are excused, minimized, or ignored. Including Police Officers, Judges, Lawyers, Psychology Community, or Anyone with Authoritative power or where you can try to get help.

That is an inversion of responsibility.

The recurring institutionalization threats, relentlessly delivered by a nonstop rotation of people over nearly 50 years, surfaced again in Terrence Scroggins’s demand that Kevin be placed in “a mental health institution for the rest of his life.” This demonstrates how individuals latch onto Kevin’s fictional past all across the world. But the question of how they are getting these insignificant details about someone of no significance, who never got a chance to go out and liv his life is a whole different topic, with Scroggins joining a pattern that began upon Kevin Perelman moving into the area two decades prior. It suggests that Scroggins is probably in contact with these other individuals, and possibly even being paid to participate in this ongoing campaign. The script remains unchanged: whether it’s Jason Perelman, Jennifer Pilchick Perelman, Michael Patrick Huntley, Tom Farley, Paul Humphrey, or countless others, essentially anyone who has entered Kevin’s life since childhood, the pattern is to provoke him, create a reaction, ignore the true trigger, label him “crazy,” and then use that label as justification for control, exclusion, discrediting, or even calls for institutionalization. The underlying message is clear: the excuses and justifications may change over time, but the intent to achieve the same end, removing Kevin from society, remains constant until they get what they want.

Jennifer Hess, Private Violations, and Public Character Attacks as Cover-Ups

Jennifer Hess is connected to a broader pattern of targeted hostility. A negative, joking comment that Kevin made in private to a friend about Jennifer Hess was later taken out of context and used by worldwide groups to fuel a much larger character attack. This is part of a repeated tactic: private conversations are weaponized, stripped of context, and broadcast globally as evidence that Kevin is two-faced or speaks badly about people behind their backs. Normal, private remarks are transformed into tools of mass character assault using unconventional Internet tactics, such as whisper networks and coordinated social campaigns. As Mike Huntley once said, “It’s your behavior”—sending the message that any negative comment, even in private, will be punished through public humiliation.

These privacy violations involving Jennifer Hess, Paul Humphrey, the LAPD, and others, are not isolated. They fit a lifelong pattern Kevin has experienced: women and men have been tasked with befriending him only to provoke, entrap, or extract private information to use against him, repeatedly rotating since his youth. Rarely does anyone confront Kevin directly for clarification. Instead, private information is weaponized to cast him in a negative light, manufacture guilt or paranoia, and build a public narrative of instability or hostility. Acknowledging how this information was obtained or used would also reveal their own invasive behavior and criminal conspiracy. Whether the plot is to create the appearance of mental illness or to setup and frame Kevin, the goal has always been to paint him as “crazy,” “criminal,” or “unstable”—a pattern that’s grown exponentially since the late 1970s.

For example, Jennifer Hess during their short interlude called Kevin to ask him to check her email with he conspiring groups she is involved with. Paul Humphrey working at LAPD who was working with her to brand me as crazy, with Mike Huntley, LAPD, and others were illegally monitoring his computer; when they saw him log into Jennifer’s account, they twisted it into an accusatory narrative that he was hacking her email. Nearly every scenario has played out this way: ordinary actsm no matter how kind, are reframed as evidence of wrongdoing, then spread to demonize Kevin worldwide. Many never questioned why Jennifer Hess seemed to befriend Kevin with apparent premeditation—to set him up—as her obsession with this mass exponentially growing groups stretched back to his early childhood and involved significant resources. As a result, Kevin’s “friends” have often been provokers and manipulators, collecting information to twist into false evidence and build a damaging paper trail to use as cover ups, once he’s gone.

The recurring method is clear: obtain private information, strip it of context, and use it to encourage hostility, suspicion, and ongoing invasions of privacy—perpetuating the cycle until Kevin is completely isolated. While Kevin simply tries to live his life, he is relentlessly pursued by anonymous, strategically organized stalking, often involving the LAPD and others with authority.

Ron Perelman’s comments make the dynamic even more clear. By telling Kevin, “You think differently,” he implies that simply noticing or questioning this mass harassment is itself evidence of mental instability. The narrative is twisted: whenever Kevin raises concerns about real, ongoing surveillance and group harassment, those very concerns are cited as proof of his supposed psychological issues.

Private remarks and isolated incidents become the foundation for a much larger narrative: that Kevin is cruel, hateful, dangerous, or unstable. The goal is to defame him, recruit others to the story, and justify ongoing privacy violations, confrontations, stalking, and provocation—supported by law enforcement intimidation.

When Kevin documents an event, asks questions, asserts boundaries, responds verbally, or tries to report harassment, the police—with community and neighborhood watch backing—often falsify statements, portraying him as the instigator: crazy, paranoid, or schizophrenic. Simple things, like taking a film photography class in 1996 and doing a photo assignment, were used against him. For example, after a Jason Perelman’s friend Mike Wexler, who Jason Introduced him to at University Of Colorado stated, “Let’s go on a road trip, but you’re not allowed to take pictures of people,” the narrative changed so that if Kevin photographed anything and a person was nearby, that person would claim he committed a crime, leading to global stalking based on the invented offense. In 2013, LAPD Officer Toro threatened, “If you ever take a picture of a person, I will exercise the law in my own way.” The system escalates harmless acts into supposed crimes, with attempts to defend himself presented as further proof of instability.

Another tactic involved Jennifer Hess using fake names, such as Jesse Hess, which later connected to individuals like porn star Jesse Jane and her associates, who began stalking and provoking Kevin. Rotating groups within the adult industry—including people like Tim Thompson, Brian Longbotham, criminal defense attorney Michael Bialys, and his girlfriend Victoria Walker—were posing as friends while gathering years’ worth of information to use against Kevin. In one instance, Jesse Jane and a friend followed him into a Jamba Juice in Woodland Hills, whistling as part of a larger campaign of cryptic harassment tactics. Similar techniques were mirrored by people like actor Michael Clarke Duncan following him into Woodland Hills, Camera, where communities would mimic the whistling terror tactic—this tactic alone sometimes dozens or more times per day, nationwide—meant to provoke reactions reinforcing a false narrative of mental illness.

In order to test the waters, Kevin went from city to city videoing public harassments, from place to place, showing the mimics, repetition, instigations to try to invoke Kevin into anger and reactions. Example, one video shows something like 15 Starbucks in a row, in one day, while he’s ordering incorporate the word “Man” in a sentence. To try to get reactions to lock him away. When they found out they were on video, they called a corrupt criminal police officer Charles Sean Dinse who has been working with the family for decades, and he forged and fabricated police reports that Kevin came in, and supposedly threatened to kill all Starbucks Customers. Of course, the Video on the Internet, shows the opposite. Kevin didn’t come in doing anything at all but being as nice as can be with mental rocks being thrown at his head from strangers he had never seen or had met. This was done all across the United States on video. Almost every interactions is the same from stranger to stranger. It then rotates to newer or different tactics. It will go from “Man” to “Bro”, from bro to “Boss” So lets say he starts going to restuarants to eat food to stay breathing. Each waiter, waitress in repetition from place to place will start calling him “Boss”. A lot of these things from from movies, songs, or media. Because that’s how it starts in 1977.

Someone might invite him over to their house, like Mike Huntley after starting Signet-e Services. Says lets watch “Fight Club” and after this, whenever he takes a walk, or gets fresh air on a park bench and sits down. People will provoke him over and over like the Movie Character to try to make him look like a violent Paranoid Schizophrenic. But it won’t be a small group. That tactics alone started in 1999 and to present. That’s right now, 27 years of worldwide almost daily, and at almost every public location, attacks with that one fight club psychological terror tactic amongst worldwide groups who think it’s funny and amusing backed by pure anger and rage for something a 5 year old is accused of by the Perelman Family and their Psychology and Police friends while trying to mask it as a joke, tease or prank. On must occasions, they are laughing. But usually when it comes time to address the issue or proven wrong is when their personality changes into pure rage due to defiance of him proving he is not what they are saying he is.

This behavior extended to Jennifer Hess pretending to have mental health issues and claiming to be pregnant with Kevin’s child. When Kevin called her for clarification, her husband answered, laughed, and confirmed she was not pregnant and was married. Instead of being concerned that someone was manipulating Kevin with false information, Kevin’s family, police, and even worldwide groups were more upset that he sought answers, accusing him of boundary violations. The real anger was not at the predator trying to lock him into an unhealthy situation. Even possibly trying to make some kind of money of a pregnancy blackmail scheme. but at Kevin for realizing the truth and speaking up. These patterns fueled further cover-ups and misrepresentations, ensuring every reaction could be misconstrued.

Jennifer Hess, like Terrence Scroggins and others involved, appeared to be sent with the singular purpose of entrapping Kevin and finding ways to remove him from society while they profit off of it, all feeding back to the Perelman family’s anger stretching from his childhood. The most disturbing question remains: why would the Perelman family and worldwide groups have such detailed private information unless they were part of a large-scale conspiracy to target and eradicate him? After so long, the endless pattern of rotating, out-of-context pranks from strangers worldwide has become a riddle with no answer—except to destroy Kevin’s life. And where things get stranger is the Perelman Family and psychology community are trying to collect every aspect of Kevin’s reactions to twist out of context to use as unethical psychological evaluations by setups, frame jobs, entrapments, disinformation, trying to push him out of control, and collect anything they can for credibility attacks. How he reacted, what his conversations were to his friends to her, or anyone else. But they were never concerned about any of these nonstop crimes against Kevin Perelman while doing everything to silence him.

A further example: in 2005, during constant mobbing, a Starbucks employee named Garrett told Kevin, “It’s your transgressions”—clearly meant as a death threat and to justify ongoing attempts to have Kevin killed or erased. The statement could only mean: “We’ve been stalking you since you were a very young child. Don’t talk, or we kill you, and you must learn to accept your own execution.” Of course, few would ever openly admit such motives, even if involved. The more he proves his innocence, criminally, mentally, stability, the angrier they get.

The same pattern emerged in interactions with his sister-in-law, Jennifer Pilchick Perelman, who moved in lawyer-connected social circles and supported labeling him as “crazy.” This drive to create a psychiatric or character-based narrative persisted rather than addressing the underlying facts. The decades-long family pattern involved labeling Kevin as unstable, spreading the label, discrediting anything he said, and then using the distress caused as purported confirmation of the label’s truth.

Information Sharing and Inability to Start Over

Attempts to rebuild or relocate were consistently undermined by the spread of negative information through law-enforcement and threat-reporting systems. As a result, Kevin was often met with hostility and suspicion even by those who did not know him personally—primed to monitor, confront, or “teach a lesson” before any honest interaction ever took place.

Paul Humphrey, Mike Huntley, and the Return From Colorado while Paul was seeking LAPD employment

Paul Humphrey befriended Kevin around age fourteen, alongside Mike Huntley. Early on, friendship and trust were used to draw Kevin into situations that later became hostile or manipulative. After Kevin went to the University of Colorado, he was pressured or manipulated into returning to California, with the promise of helping start Signet-e Services. This return placed him back near his father and the same personal, police-connected, and judicial circles that he wasn’t aware were involved in these operations.

Even attempts to avoid those involved led to being followed, approached, confronted, and tested by people he didn’t know in public places. Repeated efforts were made to find something that could be used to frame him, set him up, generate a criminal allegation, or justify his removal from normal life. Threats, including “No relaxing for you nigger,” were received by the masses all across the United States with the psychological thugging and bullying to remove from society. Translation, anywhere you go, you will be attacked, brutalized, instigated into reactions to lock you away with empty mental illness cover up labeling. These encounters seemed designed to prevent him from living freely or building a new life or any life.

Mike Huntley’s Death Threats and the 2001 Realization

Death threats from Mike Huntley in 2001 marked a major turning point. Kevin realized that the same pattern had been occurring for years, though he hadn’t understood its scope. After these threats, Kevin attempted to avoid known sources of conflict, but provocations, confrontations, and attempts to elicit reactions continued.

During this period, incidents such as Rodie Morales with Mike Huntley, Ron Perelman, Paul Humphrey many others trying to get Kevin to take a trash bag of marijuana which was most likely from LAPD, due to the fact that Rodie Morales was working with LAPD to catch someone who moved here from Europe who supposedly had killed someone while Mike Huntley wanted to sign up to the Gym where he worked so Rodie could befriend me taking me to strip clubs with Porn Starts and Strippers, with all sorts of character attacks while they posed as victims with false defamation of character worldwide riling the masses against me. This attempted setup to try to make Kevin Perelman look like a drug dealer, one of many rotating tactics on this level, became part of the pattern. Kevin did not accept the marijuana in which they wanted in his house with LAPD, which led to increased threats and efforts to create both criminal and mental-health narratives against him. Statements were made about using the judicial system as a weapon.

Mike Huntley and the 2001 Turning Point

Mike Huntley’s death threats in 2001 became a major turning point. That was when the pattern became clearer. The conduct had been happening before 2001, but the scope, the connection between events, and the role of different people had not yet fully come into focus.

After the threats, Kevin tried to avoid the people involved however the circles were extremely large, and others connected to the conflicts. However, Mike Huntley’s death threat— “World of paranoia”—was not just a threat. It was backed by 24 years of prior daily stalking groups from 1977 to 2001, exponentially growing until they got what they wanted with their hate and obsession.

Kevin wanted distance and to rebuild his life—he wanted to live without continued confrontation. But the threats, provocations, public confrontations, property interference, accusations, and efforts to collect reactions continued anyway.

This period also involved Rodie Morales, his gym manager from World Gym where Mike Huntley wanted Kevin to sign up. Rodie Morales was told to befriend Kevin while working with LAPD, and there was an incident involving a trash bag of marijuana—apparently LAPD-confiscated—since Morales was working with LAPD at the gym to catch someone who had supposedly killed someone who moved to the United States from Europe. Morales took Kevin to strip clubs, and the marijuana was presented in a way that appeared to be an attempted setup or entrapment scenario by Rodeo Morales with this group.

Kevin did not take the marijuana which angered them even more, even while being taken to strip clubs with strippers and porn stars pretending to be victims with all sorts of random claims that were going out worldwide. Afterwards, the threats, provocations, attacks, and efforts to create criminal or mental-health narratives became substantially worse than what started in 1977, because Kevin was starting to realize what was going on. One of Mike Huntley’s death threats in 2001 was, “I’ve given you enough rope to hang yourself with.” Another statement stated was, “We can’t set you up.”. But mentioning any crimes against Kevin Perelman, will result in, he suffers from mental illness, or it didn’t happen while shirking all responsibility to deal with that was happening.

The World Gym period showed how an ordinary social environment could be turned into pressure, testing, and a possible setup. Mike Huntley wanted Kevin to sign up at World Gym, where Morales became friendly with him through that setting. The later strip-club outings, the presence of people presenting themselves as victims, and the trash bag of marijuana created an environment apparently designed to place Kevin into a compromising or suspicious situation. He did not take the marijuana.

The concern was not simply the marijuana itself, but the structure: create an environment, place Kevin in it, introduce something compromising, wait for a reaction, and then use the reaction to build a criminal or mental-health narrative.

This strip club tactic, also happened at Southern Oregon State College with Alaskan Exchange student Eric Christianson, Russian Exchange Student at University Of Colorado, Val Morozov, and back in California, Rodie Morales, and Tom Farley. These abusive environments, ranged from Elementry School Classes, Middle School Classes, Colleges, Friends, Acquaintances, Strangers, On the Internet, Off the Internet, and Exponentially grew off the Internet until 1994, unit the Internet came to be, and it became significantly worse at that point, as they realized they could us it for their advantage.

After Kevin began questioning what was happening, the threats, public confrontations, hostile encounters, and efforts to create accusations became substantially worse. There were numerous death threats, including from people working with LAPD. For example: “You had better accept what’s going on or it will get a lot worse for you,” as said by a person on video who had a K9 that appeared to be LAPD-related and that could attack on command—and who shredded Kevin’s leg. LAPD, however, was not concerned with proper police reports on his behalf.

Mike Huntley’s message was: “World of paranoia, have a good life. We are using the judicial system against you. You had better live a careful life. You’re too out of control for California,” along with many other threats. The message was understood as a threat that police, courts, and false narratives could be used against Kevin—false narratives meant to eradicate a five-year-old, now stretched to evolve over 50 years.

Jennifer Pilchick Perelman and Family Patterns – “We need to deem Kevin as crazy” conspiracy and defamation of character

His brother’s wife, Jennifer Pilchick Perelman, is connected to the same family pattern described throughout this account. She has participated in political, lawyer-connected social circles and has supported taken part, and repeated the idea that he should be deemed “crazy,” rather than addressing the underlying events that caused his distress and reactions. She has been broadcasting this statement on the internet to her political lawyer friends and groups.

Kevin considers her public political activity relevant because it created an added incentive to avoid scrutiny of family conflict, private conduct, and the broader history he describes. The timing of her congressional campaigns overlapped with the period in which negative statements and narratives about him were continuing.

Kevin also recalls a Deer Valley ski trip involving her son, Reese, when he was very young. Reese was told to whistle in a shoe store by his mother Jennifer, which will link to some of the events the psychology community is analyzing—such as Kevin buying jungle boots around 1993—just like every other insignificant behavior they are putting in their guilt bag for the world to have and hint about with idea-of-reference messages that never stop. This was when this one tactic first started in mass groups, with other rotating tactics done in extremely large groups of people who were repeatedly whistling wherever he goes—sometimes 10 to 40 times per day during that time period, and still continuing 20 years later on a smaller scale. People are told, if they see him, to whistle as they walk by, over and over from random stranger to random stranger. Coffee shop employees would do it for hours straight all across the United States, no matter where he went. Jennifer was using her child to try to make her brother-in-law look crazy, just like everyone else. Kevin describes whistling as one of the recurring tactics used to provoke a visible reaction and later portray that reaction as the real problem. In his view, the incident was significant because it suggested that the pattern extended into family settings and involved people connected to Jason Perelman, Jason’s friends, and Kevin’s former social circle.

At one point, Kevin Drove all over California to Coffee Shops and restaurants videoing these connected events along with the other psychological Gas Lighting terror tactics designed by LAPD, the Psychology Community, Family, Government, from whereever they originated from. If you do your history based on 1950’s east Germany Stasi, Soviet Punitive Psychiatry, FBI Cointtelpro operations. You will understand better as to some of these highly illegal Government Neutralization operations that Ron Perelman will call teasing until his son is no more.

There is a notable court-reporter connection: Jennifer Pilchick Perelman’s father, Jay Pilchick, owned a court-reporting company in Florida. Around the same time, court reporter Debbie Wollman owned the property adjoining the wall of the townhouse, a unit that remained unoccupied. Wollman repeatedly left threatening notes on the doorstep in an apparent attempt to provoke a reaction. Simultaneously, one neighbor’s young daughter was told to back into Kevin’s car, attempting to create a situation that would elicit a response, with the claim that he was parked in “her” space—even though the space never belonged to her. After Wollman moved out, the new family regularly parked in those same spaces—which Wollman had never parked in, further confirming the spots weren’t actually hers. Video footage exists of Wollman demanding an admission of mental illness, linking these incidents to other Van Nuys Courthouse employees and the Pilchick court reporting company, and suggesting broader attempts at provocation and judicial manipulation. According to Kevin, those notes appeared designed to create confrontations and provoke a response that could later be shared with Wollman’s coworkers at the Van Nuys Courthouse. He views the situation as another example of an ordinary parking or property issue being turned into a manufactured conflict, with the focus shifted onto his reaction rather than the conduct that led to it.

There is also a pattern of behavior from these groups working with Jason Perelman, and Jennifer Pilchick Perelman to tell young children to instigate Kevin Perelman in hope for a reaction to try to make him look abusive. This is most likely to cover up all the abuse the Perelman family started on him when he was around five years old. Because everything that is going on is a cover up from what started in 1977. By the Perelman family with the Government and unlimited resources.

The issue was not an isolated whistle, note, parking dispute, or single trip. These events reflected the same broader method he describes elsewhere: information about him is circulated from factionary accusation to accusation changing and rotating to the largest circles with instigation tactics nonstop all the way down to early childhood, especially with Police, and Psychology Community involvement. People are encouraged to provoke or test him, and if they can get a response it is then separated from its context and presented as evidence that he is unstable, hostile, or difficult. If they cannot get a response, they fabricate a cover up lie that is circulated amongst the masses.

Jennifer Pilchick Perelman’s relationship to Jason Perelman, the Perelman family, and their shared social and professional circles as relevant to understanding how these narratives continued. He alleges that the pattern has remained consistent across decades: portray him as unstable, circulate that label, use it to discredit what he says, and then treat any distress created by the labeling and pressure as supposed confirmation that the label is true.

Patterns persisted through family and social circles, where psychiatric or character-based narratives were promoted rather than addressing underlying events. Labeling continued across decades, with distress from these experiences being treated as further proof of the negative identity imposed.

Oddly enough, while Jason Perelman and Jennifer Pilchick Perelman, along with these mass worldwide groups, have been stalking Kevin with the intent to remove him from society since he was very young, one of Jennifer’s political agendas during these two arrests is Judicial Reform. This allows her to politically cover up her motives and present herself as someone trying to help the very person she is working to label as crazy. It acts as a cover, making it appear as if her efforts are in his best interest, when in reality, it serves to justify the ongoing campaign against him.

Information Sharing and the Inability To Start Over

Information Sharing and the Inability To Start Over

After 2001, Kevin tried to rebuild his life and avoid the people and places connected to the attacks. However, similar hostile circles continued to appear in different locations across the United States, making it nearly impossible to relocate or start over without facing the same pattern again and again. Which the information dissemination is how it starts, and gets so big that you can’t escape it, or reason with them. He was told to simply ignore daily instigations, attacks, provocations, vandalism, assault and battery, and even attempts on his life. LAPD informed him that he was not allowed to file police reports about these stalking operations involving community members and neighborhood watch groups or really anything that shows he is a good respectable person and the victim.

This unending hostility is directly tied to false or distorted information being circulated through law enforcement and threat-reporting systems—including SAR-related reporting, behavioral-threat-assessment systems, eGuardian-type information sharing, and related channels. According to Kevin, everything LAPD and others are entering into these systems is knowingly fabricated to portray him as unstable and dangerous by design until they get what they want.

People who have never met Kevin are already primed to view him with suspicion or hostility due to these narratives. Each new encounter typically begins with pre-existing negative assumptions, leading to suspicion, confrontations, and group campaigns to “teach a lesson,” even without any direct knowledge of what actually happened. This network of negative information justifies group stalking and exclusion, with Kevin being told to accept ongoing provocations and violence as a normal part of life. When he seeks help or tries to document the abuse, he is blocked by law enforcement.

Ultimately, the environment created by this information sharing guarantees that hostile groups and orchestrated provocations will continue to appear wherever he goes, preventing any real chance for him to start over.

The message is, they want him in a cage or institution, and if they can’t get that, he’s not allowed to leave his house, turning the house into a cage. And the only real solution they will not allow is an admission from people as to the situation. Because the narrative was created and disseminated worldwide leaving no way out of the situation they say isn’t happening while using the situation itself as a mental illness label if he speaks about it.

Photography, Ordinary Conduct, and Manufactured Suspicion

Normal activities were repeatedly redefined as suspicious or dangerous.

Kevin took a film-photography class at the University of Colorado in 1996. Taking photographs was part of a class assignment and an ordinary academic activity. Yet photography later became another subject used to imply wrongdoing.

During a 1996 road-trip discussion, a friend of Jason Perelmanm Mike Wexler said:

“Let’s go on a road trip, but you’re not allowed to take pictures of people.”

Later 2013 in Encino, Ca, Officer Toro threatened after the Perelman Families anger about Studio Photography working with a girl named Aubrey Fisher Introduced to him by Rodie Morales:

“If you ever take a person, I will exercise the law in my own way.”

The issue was not simply someone objecting to a photograph. A normal college class, photo assignment, artistic activity, and everyday photography were turned into supposed evidence of something threatening, pathological, or criminal.

The same pattern applied to taking walks, pulling to the side of the road, sitting in a vehicle, making a phone call, using GPS, browsing the internet, filming encounters, or documenting property damage.

Some questioning by the community to try to create the false appearance of obsession “Why do you take so many walks”, “Why do you go to the Gym so much, your not Arnold Schwarzenegger” “How many cigars to you smoke”, “How often to you go to this social event” All line of questioning is manufactured to try to cover up their agenda with falsified labels from random strangers who aren’t even qualified. However the false labeling instantly goes worldwide for some kind of ratcheting behavioral modification to instigate reactions to remove from society.

Those activities are ordinary and healthy. Yet they were repeatedly treated as if they were evidence of instability, obsession, danger, or wrongdoing. Kevin was expected to ignore what was happening, but when he documented it, photographed it, filmed it, or asked questions, the act of documenting became part of the accusation against him.

LAPD and the Reversal of the Narrative

Despite repeated reports, LAPD consistently refused to meaningfully investigate, document, or stop these acts. Authorities were allegedly told to cover up events, focusing instead on existing negative labels about Kevin rather than on actual conduct by those involved.

These patterns extended to private investigators, who—rather than impartial help—reportedly joined the process of silencing and did not investigate when hired. While trying to charge as much as possible for simple jobs. Negative labels became the narrative, while facts and context were ignored. Money and status seem to have been obtained from perpetuating this cycle rather than seeking truth. But money is not the main objective. Charging enormous rates is a method to block the target and victim from getting help with LAPD. This also applies to Lawyers.

Background: Five Decades of Coordinated Attacks and Defamation

Terrence Scroggins is not an isolated person in an isolated vehicle-damage dispute. Rather, he is one actor in a much larger and longer history of coordinated events all directed at Kevin Perelman. These events include family hostility, childhood threats of institutionalization, repeated public confrontations, vehicle vandalism, property interference, nonstop stalking, false accusations, and coordinated efforts to portray Kevin as unstable—all while ignoring or suppressing what has truly been happening to Kevin for nearly five decades. The campaign has always had a single, chilling intention: to remove Kevin from society, deploying empty labeling (especially the recurring, weaponized assertion that “he is crazy”), illegal police monitoring, and fabricated documentation—at any cost, and with no respect for truth or justice.

Specific tactics began when Kevin was five years old. Over the years, a fabricated, forged, and fraudulent paper trail of defamation has been built inside police reports, investigations, and police/community actions all across the United States, all aimed at branding Kevin as a threat or even neutralizing (killing) him—motives that remain rooted in the insecurity, hatred, and fears of the groups and individuals perpetuating them.

The repetitive negative labels—”crazy,” “asshole,” “dangerous,” “unstable,” “public nuisance,” “it’s his behavior,”—have been used against Kevin over and over, with no attempt at honest dialogue or explanation. There exists no standard of perfection he could ever meet. He is told never to ask what is going on; whenever he tries, he is met with threats, demands for medication, coercion, or calls to institutionalize. Acts of everyday kindness, involvement, or attempts at social connection—attempts at warmth, kindness, acceptance, seeking common goals or being part of something—are all met with ridicule or retaliation, often summed up as “We don’t want him here, he is weird.” Strangers who have never met Kevin, wherever he is in the world, frequently echo this hostility. All the while, groups or individuals who insult, threaten, damage property, provoke, or escalate disputes—often acting in concert or as part of orchestrated mobbing—are labeled as the victims, while Kevin’s natural or innocent responses are isolated, exaggerated, and presented as the entire problem, regardless of what evidence exists in his defense.

This pattern is deeply rooted in Kevin’s family behavior and vocabulary: recurring messages such as, “You know what you did, now you need to pay,” are used to incite and recruit others to vilify, provoke, and, once he reacts, to justify further isolation and exclusion. There is intentionally no safe person to turn to; any attempt by Kevin to report what is happening is labeled as paranoia, delusion, or—most commonly and centrally—taken as further proof of the very label, ‘he is crazy.’ Law enforcement in Los Angeles, the psychology community, government officials, neighborhood watch groups, and private actors have all played roles in perpetuating this chaos and instability, under the pretense of protecting public safety, but always reinforcing the cycle initiated against Kevin since childhood.

Dinse, Legal System Collusion, and Broader Patterns of Abuse

Dinse has been directly implicated in these patterns. He was sued by the FBI for engaging in nearly identical tactics against Rex Schellenburger—tactics rooted in malice, illegal surveillance, and judicial abuse. Despite serious allegations, a judge denied a Pitchess motion that would have provided access to Dinse’s police personnel records, potentially exposing his misconduct and history of abuse of power. This judicial decision is particularly revealing: it fits within a wider pattern of the legal system closing ranks to shield those on the inside, even when serious abuses are credibly alleged and supported.

These events connect the dots to broader operations: the role of court reporter Debbie Wollman, the orchestrated mobbings, Terrence Scroggins’s ongoing attacks, and the shared playbook of illegal police monitoring—all designed to remove from society anybody who is deemed problematic or simply isn’t liked by those with influence or power. What emerges is a sophisticated, coordinated campaign involving law enforcement, legal professionals, and community participants, all working outside reason or legitimate justification. The ultimate objective is social eradication through personal, political, or group animosity—not due to any valid criminal basis, but by weaponizing narrative control, legal power, and relentless harassment against the chosen target.

The Double Standard and the Value of Human Life

What is extremely strange and unjust is that the value of human life seems to be important to everyone except Kevin Perelman. If someone calls the police out of fear of Kevin Perelman, authorities will investigate the claim. However, if Kevin Perelman calls the police because a girl has tried to attack him with a knife simply for taking walks or leaving his house to get fresh air, no investigation is conducted and no arrest is made. This double standard has been present since Kevin was five years old.

Kevin is not classified or treated as a human being. Instead, he is either regarded as property—like a slave to be owned, watched, and controlled—or as a Jewish person condemned in a concentration camp. This exclusion and dehumanization are perpetuated even by his own family, who are concerned about the lives of everyone else in the family except Kevin’s.

When Kevin discovers that his life is in danger due to the actions of those who are doing what they shouldn’t, they receive protection while Kevin remains expendable. The narrative is always reversed to suggest that Kevin is somehow at fault or is doing something wrong, no matter the actual circumstances.

The Larger Pattern

A clear, recurring process has emerged:

1. Negative or misleading information is circulated about Kevin.
2. People, already hostile or suspicious, approach him—primed by those narratives.
3. He is confronted, insulted, threatened, provoked, has property damaged, or is accused—often by groups or those encouraged by others.
4. He documents the encounter, asserts boundaries, responds verbally, or attempts to report the incident.
5. The original conduct by others is ignored, minimized, or denied.
6. Kevin’s response is isolated and presented as supposed proof of instability, hostility, or a threat.
7. Formal systems—police, probation, courts, investigators, or mental-health professionals—are then used to escalate pressure.

The result is a paper trail built from reactions taken out of context, not from a fair record of the original threats, vandalism, intimidation, or repeated provocations and hostilities that led to them. Kevin’s only “offense” in this cycle has been trying to address the situation, document events, seek proof of stalking and harassment, and speak in self-defense against the damaging public narrative that has been imposed upon him.

Possible California Criminal Violations Raised by This Narrative

· Penal Code § 182 — Conspiracy: Coordinated planning by multiple people to threaten, harass, damage property, spread false information, provoke reactions, or build accusations against him.

· Penal Code §§ 664 / 187 — Attempted Murder: Death threats, weapon-related incidents, physical attacks, or conduct intended to kill him, if supported by evidence of a direct step toward carrying it out.

· Penal Code § 422 — Criminal Threats: Statements such as “That’s the man I want to kill,” Mike Huntley’s alleged death threats, and other threats of death or serious bodily injury.

· Penal Code § 646.9 — Stalking: Repeated following, unwanted approaches, appearances at public locations, contact near his residence or property, and threats meant to create fear.

· Penal Code § 594 — Vandalism: Vehicle defacement, property damage, tampering, and destruction of vehicles or other personal property.

· Vehicle Code § 10852 — Vehicle Tampering: Placing objects or substances in or around vehicles, tampering with gas tanks, jamming windows, interfering with components, or making a vehicle unsafe or unusable.

· Penal Code § 240 — Assault: Attempts or threats with the present ability to physically injure him during confrontations.

· Penal Code § 242 — Battery: Unwanted physical contact or physical attacks.

· Penal Code § 245 — Assault With a Deadly Weapon or Force Likely to Cause Great Bodily Injury: Knife-related threats, weapon-related conduct, or attacks capable of causing serious injury.

· Penal Code § 148.5 — False Report of a Crime: Knowingly false police accusations, false victim narratives, or reports made to create criminal consequences.

· Penal Code § 134 — Preparing False Evidence: Creating, staging, altering, or preserving false material for use in police, probation, or court proceedings.

· Penal Code § 136.1 — Witness Intimidation or Dissuasion: Threats or pressure intended to stop him from reporting conduct, presenting evidence, seeking help, or speaking publicly.

· Penal Code § 518 — Extortion: Seeking money, restitution, property, silence, or another advantage through force, fear, threats, or intimidation.

· Penal Code § 523 — Threats to Obtain Money or Advantage: Threatening injury, accusation, exposure, or reputational harm to obtain money, restitution, silence, or compliance.

· Penal Code § 236 — False Imprisonment: Preventing or restricting his ability to move freely, leave, use public spaces, park, walk, or live normally through force, threats, or intimidation.

	Local, Multi State,… on Community Mobbing – Aubrey Fis…
	Jade Barnes on Neighbors, Metro Neighbors, an…
	Henry on Some of my Art Mike Huntley, B…
	Jack on 7/21/2020 – WITNESS and…
	Sperax on gang stalking – the stri…

kevin perelman target

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Meta

Long-Running Character Attacks, Rotating Provocations, and Efforts to Remove Kevin Perelman from Society And LAPD Cover Up Operations that start around 1977 – Defamation of Character

Overview: A Lifelong Orchestrated Campaign Against Kevin Perelman

Terrence Scroggins and the Long-Running Character Attacks, Rotating Provocations, and Efforts to Remove Kevin Perelman from Society, and LAPD Cover-Up Operations – Defamation of Character

Greg Koenig, Vehicle Vandalisms, and Defacements

Repair Shops and Vehicle Interference – Conduct designed to make vehicles unsafe, unusable, embarrassing, or expensive to maintain. Repair Shops and Vehicle Interference

Defining the Motive Behind the Tactics

Defamation of Character and the LAPD Cover-Up Pattern

The 1977 Origin of the Empty Labels

Jason Perelman and the Early Institutionalization Threats

Jennifer Hess, Private Violations, and Public Character Attacks as Cover-Ups

Paul Humphrey, Mike Huntley, and the Return From Colorado while Paul was seeking LAPD employment

Mike Huntley and the 2001 Turning Point

Jennifer Pilchick Perelman and Family Patterns – “We need to deem Kevin as crazy” conspiracy and defamation of character

Information Sharing and the Inability To Start Over

Photography, Ordinary Conduct, and Manufactured Suspicion

LAPD and the Reversal of the Narrative

Background: Five Decades of Coordinated Attacks and Defamation

Dinse, Legal System Collusion, and Broader Patterns of Abuse

The Double Standard and the Value of Human Life

The Larger Pattern

Possible California Criminal Violations Raised by This Narrative

Like this:

Related

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Archives

Categories

Meta

Long-Running Character Attacks, Rotating Provocations, and Efforts to Remove Kevin Perelman from Society And LAPD Cover Up Operations that start around 1977 – Defamation of Character

Overview: A Lifelong Orchestrated Campaign Against Kevin Perelman

Terrence Scroggins and the Long-Running Character Attacks, Rotating Provocations, and Efforts to Remove Kevin Perelman from Society, and LAPD Cover-Up Operations – Defamation of Character

Greg Koenig, Vehicle Vandalisms, and Defacements

Repair Shops and Vehicle Interference – Conduct designed to make vehicles unsafe, unusable, embarrassing, or expensive to maintain. Repair Shops and Vehicle Interference

Defining the Motive Behind the Tactics

Defamation of Character and the LAPD Cover-Up Pattern

The 1977 Origin of the Empty Labels

Jason Perelman and the Early Institutionalization Threats

Jennifer Hess, Private Violations, and Public Character Attacks as Cover-Ups

Paul Humphrey, Mike Huntley, and the Return From Colorado while Paul was seeking LAPD employment

Mike Huntley and the 2001 Turning Point

Jennifer Pilchick Perelman and Family Patterns – “We need to deem Kevin as crazy” conspiracy and defamation of character

Information Sharing and the Inability To Start Over

Photography, Ordinary Conduct, and Manufactured Suspicion

LAPD and the Reversal of the Narrative

Background: Five Decades of Coordinated Attacks and Defamation

Dinse, Legal System Collusion, and Broader Patterns of Abuse

The Double Standard and the Value of Human Life

The Larger Pattern

Possible California Criminal Violations Raised by This Narrative

Share this:

Like this:

Related

Leave a ReplyCancel reply

Discover more from kevin perelman target