kevin perelman target

The psychological warfare being directed at me, Kevin Perelman, is not random harassment, misunderstanding, ordinary conflict, or isolated misconduct. It is an ongoing, highly strategic, premeditated campaign designed to remove a person from society without having to openly admit that removal is the goal.

In my case, this begins around 1977, when I was approximately five years old. That point matters because the entire operation is built on the exploitation of imperfection. A five-year-old child shows shyness or anxiety, and instead of treating it as ordinary childhood fear, stress, sensitivity, or development, the people around him exploit it. They take a tiny human imperfection and turn it into a lifelong narrative. They do not help the child. They study the vulnerability. They preserve it. They exploit it, they weaponize it.

That is the core tactic: find the smallest flaw, exaggerate it, attach a label to it, and then use that label to justify escalating abuse.

A child has anxiety.

A child is too shy to talk to a girl.
A teenager pulls a few eyebrow hairs under stress.
A person leaves a Coke can on a bench.
A person goes on a date and it does not work out.
A person asks why strange things are happening around him in 2001 to his friend and business partner since 14 met with Judicial Death threats and Worldwide Support to eradicate at all costs.

In normal life, imperfection has a natural ending. If a man goes on a date with a woman and it does not work out, both people move on. Maybe someone was tired. Maybe someone yawned. Maybe the chemistry was not there. Maybe one person was hypersensitive. In a normal society, that becomes nothing more than an ordinary failed date.

But in my case, ordinary imperfections are not allowed to end naturally. They are archived, exaggerated, broadcast, and weaponized. Worldwide groups and mass community circles are told, again and again, “Look what he did now,” until a harmless or minor event becomes part of a manufactured record. A failed date becomes a character attack. A yawn becomes “he is rude,” “he harasses women,” or “he is a womanizer.” A small mistake becomes another entry in a global laundry list of fiction.

That is defamation of character by design.

The purpose is not to understand what happened. The purpose is to build a permanent archive of distorted events, stripped of context, that can be used as a weapon. Each little imperfection is preserved, inflated, and connected to the next one, creating the illusion of a pattern where no honest pattern exists.

That shows premeditation, motive, and intent from day one. The goal is not to let ordinary human situations fizzle out. The goal is to exploit each minor imperfection, provoke more reactions, and then add those reactions to the same fictional archive. Instead of saying, “It just didn’t work out,” or “That was a normal human mistake,” the system escalates. It uses the smallest moments to justify bigger and bigger attacks.

That is the difference between normal life and an organized campaign. Normal people move on. This system collects, distorts, broadcasts, and weaponizes.

The system does not pour water on the fire. It pours gasoline on it and then blames the target for the flames.

That is the brilliance of the tactic — not moral brilliance, but criminal brilliance. It is detailed, patient, layered, and engineered so that every part of the system protects every other part. Family members, community members, police, courts, prosecutors, defense attorneys, judges, psychiatric labels, public rumors, internet-based harassment, and government power all function together to create one manufactured conclusion: that the target is the problem and society is justified in removing him.

This is what makes the tactic so dangerous. It does not simply attack a person directly. It first builds a false identity around the person. It creates a label. It repeats the label. It provokes the target. It watches for reactions. It strips away context. It converts normal self-defense into alleged instability. Then the government, police, courts, and psychology community point to the artificially created pressure and call it evidence.

The Perelman family, police, government actors, and psychology community pretend they do not understand the difference between calming a situation and escalating it. But they do understand. Everyone understands that you do not pour gasoline on a fire to put it out. You pour water on it. When people repeatedly choose gasoline, year after year, decade after decade, the conclusion is obvious: they are not trying to put the fire out. They are trying to make it bigger.

The strategy is not accidental. It is too consistent, too repetitive, too coordinated, and too useful to the people benefiting from it. The entire structure operates like a social and legal trap: manufacture a psychiatric or criminal image, isolate the person, block his ability to defend himself, and then use the blocked defense as further proof that he does not belong in society.

In my case, what begins in 1977 does not remain in the past. It continues through the present, through ongoing legal abuse, police misconduct, psychiatric labeling, courtroom manipulation, public gaslighting, and political exploitation under systems like Governor Gavin Newsom’s CARE Act. The goal remains the same: to make me look dangerous, unstable, defective, or socially unacceptable so that removing me from society appears justified.

The true genius of the operation is that it disguises destruction as concern. It disguises stalking as public safety. It disguises coercion as treatment. It disguises political profit as compassion. It disguises legal corruption as procedure. It disguises hate as social order.

The dated events belong to history, but the machinery is current. What happened in the past explains the pattern; what is happening now shows the pattern is still expanding. Lawyers are refusing meaningful defense. Prosecutors are manufacturing narratives. Judges are allowing misconduct. Police are escalating labels. The psychology community is being used as a weapon. Government policy is moving backward toward forced control. The system is not correcting itself. It is expanding.

A Life Defined by Relentless Orchestration

From early childhood, the pattern is to take ordinary human behavior and twist it into something sinister. If I showed anxiety, it was treated as a defect. If I reacted to stress, it was treated as proof that I was unstable. Around age 12, when I had a nervous habit involving eyebrow pulling — something that could be described as trichotillomania or stress-related hair pulling — that too was treated not as a minor stress response, but as a weaponized label.

In today’s world, people commonly discuss ADHD, anxiety, OCD, trauma, depression, stress habits, and all kinds of manageable psychological or behavioral conditions. None of those things justify stripping a person of rights. None justify stalking someone, framing someone, provoking someone, or trying to lock someone away. But in my case, even the smallest sign of stress was treated as though it were a life sentence.

The message seemed to be: if your name is Kevin Perelman, even ordinary childhood anxiety or a nervous habit can be turned into a reason to destroy your life.

This is never about help. If it were about help, then every attempt I make to live a healthy, productive life would be welcomed. Instead, the opposite happens. The more I try to be healthy, stable, productive, creative, independent, and socially normal, the angrier my family, police, government actors, parts of the psychology community, and mass harassment groups become. That fact alone reveals the motive. People who genuinely want someone healthy do not become enraged when that person improves. People do not try to sabotage another person’s health unless their goal is harm.

One of the nonstop examples from my adolescence probably around the age of 14, still going on today, almost daily shows the level of planning and symbolic manipulation involved.

At age 14, I was taken on a Bahama cruise with Ron Perelman, Jason Perelman my father and brother, with Jason’s friend Darren Moselle. During that cruise, Jason Perelman and Darren Moselle encouraged me to drink as many alcohol shots as possible with them at the bars on the cruise ship — specifically  Kamikazes and B-52s. Those names matter. They were not random drinks. They are references tied to war, airplanes, bombing, and World War II imagery. At the same time, Jason Perelman bought a Kershaw pocketknife, handed it to me, and said, “I bought you a knife.” Because he wanted the knife of me to make me look paranoid, with their schizophrenia tactics while trying to invoke reactions to create the illusion of a violent paranoid schitzofrenic.

The setup and frame job were not simply about getting a teenager drunk. They were about creating an image: Kevin Perelman, with a last name sounding like “Pearl Harbor,” drinking Kamikazes and B-52s, being handed a knife, and then being provoked into looking belligerent or dangerous. The attempt was to connect my identity to war symbolism, violence, and supposed mental illness — as though I were conforming to media or historical references in a schizophrenic or delusional way.

Ironically, this also connects to Ron Perelman, my father, taking us to see Wizards by Ralph Bakshi. In that film, Nazi imagery is projected into the sky as part of a good-versus-evil narrative involving wizard brothers and a mutant war. The evil brother, Blackwolf, uses projected Nazi imagery as a weapon against what is left of humanity. At the same time, Jason was hosting his bulletin board service, The Warriors Castle, using 56K dial-up modems and an Atari 800 computer.

That is the kind of manipulation I am talking about. It is not simply one event. It is a pattern of staging, symbolism, provocation, and narrative creation.

Small, ordinary acts are treated the same way. If I leave a Coke can on a park bench, it can be turned into “he is a litterer” or “he does not respect society.” If I yawn on a date because I am tired, it can be turned into “he harasses women,” “he is rude,” or “he is a womanizer.” If I visit a website, send an email, or say something in a conversation, people can later play hinting games — implying they know private details — to destabilize me and force a reaction.

The goal is always the same: take something minor, strip it of context, exaggerate it, broadcast it, then use the public reaction to justify more harassment.

The Dehumanization of the Target

The deeper issue is dehumanization. I am not treated as a person with rights, dignity, emotions, or legal protections. I am treated like an object, a slave, a piece of property, or a disposable target. The campaign against me is not based on law and order. It is based on hierarchy: the idea that Kevin Perelman is somehow inferior, and therefore ordinary laws do not apply when people harm him.

That is why I describe this as hatred. It is not just harassment. It is not just defamation. It is not just legal misconduct. It is a worldview in which one person can be declared beneath the protection of the law, and then everyone else is allowed to participate in his destruction.

That is how atrocities begin. First, a person is labeled. Then the label becomes more important than the person. Then the person’s words no longer matter. Then the person’s rights no longer matter. Then harm against that person becomes justified as “help,” “safety,” “public concern,” or “mental health intervention.”

Historical Playbooks: Gestapo, Stasi, COINTELPRO, NSA, and Vault 7

The tactics being used against me do not come from nowhere. They resemble methods used by repressive states and intelligence operations throughout history.

The Gestapo used informants, dossiers, suspicion, rumor, and fear to isolate and destroy people. The target did not need to commit a real crime. The accusation itself became enough to justify persecution.

The Stasi in East Germany developed psychological warfare tactics known as Zersetzung, or decomposition. The goal was not always to arrest someone immediately. It was to break the target psychologically, socially, professionally, and emotionally. Friends, neighbors, employers, institutions, and officials could be used to make daily life unbearable while maintaining plausible deniability.

COINTELPRO, conducted by the FBI, showed that even in the United States, government agencies have used surveillance, infiltration, false narratives, disruption, and character assassination against citizens and political groups. The public-facing justification was security. The real-world effect was often the destruction of civil rights, dissent, and reputation.

The NSA, or National Security Agency, is critical to this discussion because mass surveillance creates the technical backbone for this kind of abuse. Once communications, browsing, metadata, associations, and private activity can be monitored or inferred, the information can be weaponized. It can be used to intimidate, manipulate, hint, smear, or provoke. The public is told surveillance is for national security, but surveillance systems can become the problem when they are turned against citizens.

Vault 7, involving CIA cyber capabilities revealed to the public, demonstrated the modern scale of digital intrusion and covert technological power. The significance is not merely that tools exist. The significance is that once such tools exist, the public must ask how they can be abused, who controls them, and what happens when secrecy becomes a shield for misconduct.

The common thread is always the same: a system claims to protect society while quietly building tools to monitor, manipulate, discredit, and destroy selected targets.

That is why these historical comparisons matter. They show that psychological destruction, surveillance, rumor campaigns, and institutional cover stories are not imaginary concepts. They are known tools of power.

Van Nuys Courthouse, LAPD, and the Courtroom as a Weapon

In my experience, the Van Nuys Courthouse and the Los Angeles Police Department are central to this campaign. What should be a justice system functions as a machine for manufacturing guilt.

Prosecutors, including Lisa Orbelli in the 2023 case, rely on hearsay, emotional claims, and newly invented accusations rather than evidence. Claims are made that I am following people home, taking pictures, or trying to incite violence — yet Lead Officer Charles Sean did not personally witness these things. Instead of courtroom procedure, evidence, investigation, and cross-examination, these claims are pushed verbally as coercive narratives to judges.

That is not justice. That is narrative manufacturing.

The pattern is to pad the case with newer and newer accusations, often appearing during trial or proceedings, without proper investigation or substantiation. The goal is to overwhelm the record with volume: if enough accusations are thrown into the air, the court begins to treat the smoke as fire.

This is especially dangerous when the defense attorney refuses to do the job of defense.

Defense attorneys are supposed to speak on behalf of the accused. They are supposed to cross-examine witnesses, expose motive, reveal bias, impeach false testimony, challenge hearsay, and protect the defendant’s constitutional rights. In a case involving alleged provocation, harassment, and staged reactions, the defense attorney’s job is even more important: to show intent, malice, premeditation, and motive to instigate.

But in my cases, I allege that defense attorneys are refusing to defend me at all costs.

Jonathan Franklin allegedly stated in 2013, “I’m not going to say anything bad about a police officer,” while still taking money and failing to provide a fair defense. That statement, if accurately remembered, summarizes the entire failure: a defense attorney who refuses to challenge police misconduct is not defending the client. He is protecting the system.

Shep Zeberman allegedly told me, in substance, that we could “get out of this” because he knew the appropriate psychology people and could get the right labels for me. That is not a defense strategy. That is a path toward psychiatric destruction. Instead of proving innocence or exposing misconduct, the attorney’s solution was to move me toward the very labeling system being weaponized against me.

In three cases, I allege that defense attorneys refuse to cross-examine properly, refuse to impeach witnesses, refuse to file meaningful motions, refuse to challenge false police reports, and refuse to build a real defense.

Judges, including Judge Dohey at Van Nuys Courthouse, allow these abuses to continue. If judges know that prosecutors are relying on hearsay, that police are fabricating or exaggerating, and that defense attorneys are refusing to defend, then the judge is no longer a neutral referee. The judge becomes part of the machinery.

I also allege that court personnel and related individuals are part of the intimidation environment, including Debbie Woolman, a court reporter who allegedly purchased property adjoining my wall but did not live there. In the context of everything else, even acts like this appear less like coincidence and more like psychological pressure.

Appeals, Ineffective Assistance, and the Protection of Judicial Corruption

The appellate process continues the same pattern. The appeal does not meaningfully bring in the core issue: intent, malice, judicial corruption, prosecutorial misconduct, police fabrication, and the refusal of defense attorneys to expose any of it. Instead, the system narrows the case, sanitizes it, and avoids the real misconduct that makes the trial unfair in the first place.

A trial cannot be fair when defense counsel refuses, at all costs, to expose judicial corruption, police misconduct, prosecutorial fabrication, and the motives behind the accusations. That is ineffective assistance of counsel in its most damaging form. It is not merely a missed objection or a weak strategy. It is the abandonment of the central defense.

When the defense refuses to show that witnesses have motive, intent, malice, and a reason to provoke or frame the defendant, the jury never sees the real case. When the defense refuses to cross-examine witnesses on corruption, bias, fabrication, and coordinated misconduct, the trial becomes theater. The prosecution presents a manufactured story, the defense refuses to dismantle it, and the judge allows the false structure to stand.

On appeal, the same concealment continues. The appellate process avoids the judicial corruption itself, even though exposing corruption is the only way to strengthen the legal system. Hiding corruption does not protect the courts. It weakens them. It allows judges, prosecutors, police officers, and attorneys to operate on private agendas instead of law and order.

If appellate judges and appellate attorneys refuse to confront the corruption beneath the conviction, they are not preserving justice. They are preserving the machinery that produced the injustice. They are protecting the appearance of the system while sacrificing the integrity of the system.

A functioning appellate court should expose legal rot so the courts can correct themselves. Instead, the process is being used to bury the rot, protect the trial court, and prevent accountability. That is why the appeal becomes part of the same campaign: no self-defense, no transparency, no accountability, and no admission that the original trial was structurally unfair.

The result is not law. It is damage control for judicial misconduct.

Weaponizing Psychiatry and Labels

The campaign depends on psychiatric labeling because psychiatric labels can be used to bypass ordinary legal and moral safeguards. If a person is accused of a crime, evidence is supposed to matter. But if a person is labeled “mentally ill,” suddenly officials can pretend coercion is care.

That is the danger.

The system first creates the pressure, then labels the reaction. It stalks, provokes, isolates, humiliates, and threatens — then, if the target reacts, the reaction is called proof of illness. That is not diagnosis. That is entrapment.

If officials have to stalk someone, provoke someone, frame someone, and manipulate someone to make that person appear mentally ill, then they already know the label is false or insufficient. A truly dangerous person does not require a global theater production to appear dangerous. The fact that the appearance has to be manufactured proves the fraud.

This is where the legal history becomes extremely important.

The Suppression of Self-Defense: Turning Questions Into “Symptoms”

One of the most brilliant and malicious features of this operation is the suppression of every form of self-defense — even verbal self-defense. The strategy is not only to harm the target, but to make it impossible for the target to describe the harm without the description itself being twisted into alleged evidence of mental illness, paranoia, hostility, or violence.

That is the calculated genius of gaslighting. The perpetrators create the conditions, hide the source, provoke the reactions, violate privacy, threaten the target, and then wait for the inevitable moment when the target begins asking questions. The moment the target says, “Something is wrong,” the system turns around and says, “See, he is paranoid.”

That is not an accident. That is the intended destination.

In my case — and probably in many cases like this — the pressure is pushed nonstop and daily, with groups locally and worldwide attempting to provoke reactions, fear, anger, and ultimately violence. But based on the entire pattern, they know the target is not violent. That is the point. If the target were naturally violent, they would not need decades of gaslighting, stalking, privacy violations, staged provocations, false accusations, and social pressure to create the appearance of violence.

They know the target is not violent.
They want the target to look violent.

That distinction exposes the agenda.

Around 2001, after decades of daily provocations, privacy violations, strange social manipulation, and computer-related intrusions designed to invoke reactions that had been exponentially growing since 1977, I began to recognize that something larger was happening. I began asking my friend and business partner, Michael Patrick Huntley, what exactly was going on. Instead of concern, honesty, or reassurance, I was met with threats and intimidation. The responses included statements and messages in substance such as: “world of paranoia,” “have a good life now,” “we are using the judicial system against you,” and “you better live a careful life.”

These were not the responses of a friend concerned about confusion or distress. They were the responses of someone participating in coercion.

Around that same period, Michael Patrick Huntley, Ron Perelman, my father, and LAPD-connected actors were involved in trying to set me up with Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinse, Officer Jenson, Detective Shapiro, Detective Angela Stewart, and many others. Most importantly, another friend I had known since I was 14 years old, Paul Humphrey, also became heavily involved in these operations. Around the same time Michael Patrick Huntley latched onto me and began stalking me, Paul Humphrey was also involved. In 1998, Paul worked for LAPD and later used security-company resources to stalk me.

After my family, along with Michael Patrick Huntley, lured me back from the University of Colorado by pitching an internet hosting provider Huntley wanted to start called Signet-e Services, the setup, as I understood it, involved trying to get me to take a trash bag full of LAPD-confiscated marijuana in order to create the appearance that I was a drug dealer. At the same time, my father was trying to create the appearance that I had guns or weapons in my house in order to make me look dangerous.

As my family was luring me back from Colorado, Ron Perelman, my father, was marrying a Cuban woman he had met named Janet Nordet. She went from a “Suzy Homemaker” image into what appeared to be paranoia. Eventually, he had a child with her, and she later ended up in jail for three years. I was told it was for solicitation to commit murder. Ironically, the same patterns that were used against her appear to have been used against me by my own father and his office employees, following an almost identical template.

While I cannot vouch for her actions, I can vouch for my own. The pattern suggests that my father may have married her, in part, to pin his narratives on me — accusing me of doing things to her in order to cover up what he was doing to her and to me. The timing was too perfect: he called me and told me I should move back, offering to let me live in his house for a year. At the same time, he was trying to rile me up against his wife by taking me out to dinner every Sunday night, pretending it was about bonding with his child.

The cruelty of the tactic is that it was presented under the language of help. It was framed as, “I want to help you have a good life,” while every meaningful part of my life — my name, reputation, relationships, privacy, business, credibility, and standing in society — was being damaged or destroyed worldwide.

That is not help. That is a setup.

It is the same strategy again and again: create the appearance of danger, create the appearance of criminality, create the appearance of instability, and then use the manufactured appearance to justify state intervention. The trash bag of LAPD-confiscated marijuana setup, involving Mike Huntley and Rodie Morales, while they were taking me to strip clubs across Los Angeles, Colorado, and Oregon, was part of creating the image of an obsessed drug dealer. At the same time, I allege they were paying off strippers and porn stars to stalk me, cry wolf, and play the victim.

The drug narrative would create the image of an obsessed drug dealer. The gun and weapon narrative would create the image of a dangerous person. The psychiatric labeling would create the image of someone who should not be believed. Together, the combined narrative becomes a pretext to remove someone from society.

This reflects an extreme amount of hatred from the Perelman family against their own child — beginning when I was five years old and obsessively growing over 49 years.

Around the same time, my own mother angrily told me to “go to a psychiatrist and tell them everything,” while having a prepared list of phone numbers ready to give me at the exact moment I began realizing something was wrong. That detail matters because it shows preparation. It was not spontaneous concern. It appeared staged for the moment I reached the point they had been pushing me toward.

This is how the trap works. If I say, “Leave me alone,” they can call it hostility. If I walk away from any of the nonstop situations, they call it paranoia, If I say, “You people are sick,” or react to any aspect of it, on any level, they will call it instability. If I say, “Why are you doing this?” they can call it paranoia. If I describe the pattern, they can claim I am seeing things that are not there. If I give them video of direct or indirect proof of provokings, death threats, physical attacks, they will refuse to look or acknowledge it.  Every normal response to abuse is converted into a psychiatric talking point no matter how blatantly obvious the situation is. LAPD even refused to acknowledge of take video of a girl trying to slice me up with a knife. They also took video of a person who intentionally unleashed a dog which could attack on que that they had shred my leg, stating the event never happened. Even though the video of a lot of this is on youtube.com or the internet for the world to see due to the fact they won’t write any police reports on my behalf on any level. Or at least the ones they do, they bury and modularize, so it is never looked at as ongoing daily attacks and situations of setups and frame jobs, and defamation of character.

That is the brilliance of suppressing self-defense. The target is abused with attacks until he asks questions, and then the questions are treated as symptoms.

The operation is premeditated, calculated, and designed to push the target to a specific psychological checkpoint: the moment of recognition. The perpetrators know that after enough gaslighting, privacy violations, threats, staged evidence, and staged provocations, any rational person will eventually begin asking what is happening. That moment is then weaponized. It becomes the scripted “proof” they were waiting for.

This is especially important because the campaign does not begin with the internet. It begins around 1977, long before ordinary public internet use. By the time the internet becomes publicly available in the 1990s, the underlying campaign is already decades old. The internet does not create the operation; it expands it. It gives the operation speed, reach, coordination, and the ability to broadcast defamatory narratives worldwide.

By 2001, when I begin to recognize the pattern and ask questions, the system has a new tool: internet-based communication. Suddenly, the act of asking questions can be broadcast and distorted instantly. Worldwide groups can be told, “He is crazy,” “He is paranoid,” “He thinks people are after him,” “He has guns,” “He is dangerous,” “He is involved with drugs,” or “He needs to be locked away.” But that does not happen by itself. Someone has to spread that narrative. Someone has to broadcast it. Someone has to coordinate the interpretation before the public ever hears my side. However when Jason Perelman wanted me to see the Internet in 1994, this is really when the defamation of character, and worldwide attacks, setups, frame jobs really got bad while I was at University of Colorado, Teachers, Classmates, Social Groups off of Internet Related Chat. It was always going on, all the way down to around 5 years old. And some of Jason Perelman’s friends he introduced me to, from University of Colorado, that he was friends with before he graduated, like Jason Baum, and Mike Wexler.

That is why the psychiatric label is fraudulent. It is not arising naturally from reality. It is being manufactured through fictional defamation of character. A false narrative is created, repeated, and distributed until people react to the narrative instead of the person. Example, Anita Perelman claims I hit the neighbor kid Josh Burnum in the head with a golf club, right around the time the movie Happy Gilmore came out when I was 16. However it wasn’t directed stated this way. She simply asked me if I had hit Josh Burnum in the head with a Golf Club to try to invoke a reaction, and say I conform to media. Obviously, this event never happened like all the other countless events.

The same pattern appears in the alleged attempts to plant or push drugs and weapons into the narrative around me. Whether through staged evidence, threats, privacy violations, psychological pressure, or LAPD-connected setups, the goal is the same: create a situation where I either remain silent and defenseless or speak up and get labeled. Both situations involve labeling to remove from society.

That is not concern,

That is not mental health.
That is not law enforcement.
That is not public safety.
That is a strategic operation.

That has nothing to do with wanting the person to have a good life, it is about what the obsessed psychotic wants for themselves.

The target is placed in an impossible position. If he says nothing, the abuse continues. If he speaks, his words are turned into evidence against him. If he asks for help, he is directed toward psychiatry. If he refuses the label, that refusal becomes part of the label. If he identifies the abuse, he is accused of paranoia or other changing psychological and criminal labels. If he identifies the people involved, he is accused of delusion.

This is why the operation is so dangerous. It does not merely attack the body, reputation, or legal status of the target. It attacks the target’s ability to explain reality with refusal to communicate to the target and victim such as myself what is even going on. Why they are so angry.

2001 at Signet-e Services with Michael Patrick Huntley is a perfect defining point of 50 years of my life. Mass angry mobs of anonymous strangers worldwide are mad at me since I was 5 years old, lashing out in anger and rage, but I’m not allowed to know what’s going on or why. While told I need to give coerce false confessions which are going to reinforce their lies and agenda to eradicate at all costs. Then stating well, he’s a violent paranoid schizophrenic, it’s not his fault, and we needed to help him by removing him from society. Or weird random statements that it’s because he’s weird or misunderstood. However when it comes to direct reasoning, on any of these vague statements, no one is actually capable of a factual argument based on specifics. Which explains why these changing statements are mimicked from anonymous stranger to stranger worldwide who I’ve never met. And refuse to admit they know of me while lashing out in anger and rage at me by design.

At its core, this is about hatred, profit, and control. The goal is not truth. The goal is not safety. The goal is not treatment. The goal is to push someone to the point of recognition, punish them for recognizing it, and then use the punishment to justify a larger political and financial machine.

It is a system of fictional defamation designed to let perpetrators get what they want while making the victim’s self-defense look like the problem.

That is the cruelty.
That is the strategy.
That is the trap.

I was born in 1972 on Castle Airforce base in Merced California

The Legal Backdrop: O’Connor, Roulet, Susan T., Guerrero, and Wendland

In O’Connor v. Donaldson (1975), the United States Supreme Court made clear that a state cannot constitutionally confine a person merely because of mental illness if that person is not dangerous and can survive safely in freedom. This case matters because it marked a movement away from arbitrary confinement based on empty labels.

The principle was simple: the government cannot lock someone away simply because officials, family members, neighbors, or institutions dislike them or consider them abnormal, weird, different, crazy, are afraid of them, misunderstood.

California also moved in a more rights-protective direction. In Conservatorship of Roulet (1979), the California Supreme Court strengthened due process protections in conservatorship proceedings. The state could not simply remove a person’s liberty based on weak proof or vague claims.

Later California cases, including Conservatorship of Susan T., Conservatorship of Guerrero, and Conservatorship of Wendland, further emphasized autonomy, evidentiary standards, and limits on forced control. These cases matter because they show a legal movement toward protecting people who are not violent, not dangerous, and not properly subject to confinement based on empty labels or even mental illness.

That legal movement represents progress. It recognizes that psychiatric labels can be abused. It recognizes that the state must be restrained. It recognizes that liberty cannot be destroyed by rumor, family pressure, police opinion, or courtroom convenience.

And that a Mental Illness labels can be synonyms with racial bigotry. Labeling others as different, and punishing for it over the label itself. The person is not being attacked and punished because they did anything wrong, they are being attacked and punished for the mere label put on them. Just like the color of someone’s skin.

Governor Gavin Newsom’s direction in California moves backward.

Newsom, the CARE Act, and California’s Regression

Governor Newsom’s CARE Act is not merely a past policy decision. It is an active and expanding system. It is currently pushing California backward from the due-process protections created by cases like O’Connor v. Donaldson, Conservatorship of Roulet, Conservatorship of Susan T., Conservatorship of Guerrero, and Conservatorship of Wendland. Instead of moving toward liberty, evidence, rehabilitation, and autonomy, California is moving toward broader state control, psychiatric labeling, court-ordered treatment, institutional supervision, and institutional profit.

The danger is not historical. It is happening now, and it is getting worse.

The CARE Act is presented as compassion. It is marketed as mental health reform, public safety, and help for vulnerable people. But in the wrong hands, it becomes a Trojan horse: a way to force people into court-controlled treatment pipelines based on labels, allegations, and state power.

The concern is not merely theoretical. In my case, the same machinery already exists: police labeling, prosecutorial exaggeration, defense attorney refusal, judicial cooperation, and public rumor campaigns. CARE Act-style systems give those same actors another pathway to achieve what they cannot prove through ordinary law.

Instead of proving a crime, they can imply illness.
Instead of proving danger, they can claim concern.
Instead of offering evidence, they can offer labels.
Instead of due process, they can offer “help.”

That is why Newsom’s direction is so dangerous. It reverses the humanity of O’Connor, Roulet, and other rights-protective cases. It moves back toward a world where the state can use psychiatric language to remove inconvenient people from society.

This pattern also proves something larger: California’s current political direction does not truly respect the legal principles behind the Supreme Court and California cases that restrict arbitrary psychiatric confinement. Those cases protect people who are not violent, not dangerous, and not properly subject to confinement based on empty labels. Newsom’s California moves in the opposite direction by creating new ways to pressure, label, process, and control people through courts and mental-health systems.

That reinforces the reason officials need to create the appearance of violence. If the target is not violent, then the state lacks the moral and legal justification to remove him. So the system manufactures danger. It creates staged narratives involving weapons, drugs, threats, instability, paranoia, schizophrenia, obsession, trauma, or public fear. It does this to bypass law and order and reach the desired result anyway.

That is not justice.
That is not treatment.
That is not public safety.
That is the crime underneath all the other crimes: manufacturing the justification to erase a person from society.

Just like Adolf Hitler himself

Why would California de-evolve in humanity unless there is another motive?

The obvious motives are power, money, political gain, institutional expansion, and control.

In my view, Newsom’s policies are not merely about helping people. They are about building a political kingdom of control. Good people, innocent people, poor people, traumatized people, disliked people, and scapegoated people can be sacrificed so politicians can claim they are solving homelessness, crime, public disorder, or mental illness.

That is not compassion. That is public relations wrapped around coercion.

Profit Over People: California Jails, Inmate Costs, and the Incentive to Cage

The financial incentive is enormous. California spends roughly around $133,000 per inmate per year. Even if the exact number varies by year or category, the point is the same: incarceration is a massive financial system. When 80 people are housed in one dorm, the amount of money attached to those bodies is staggering.

With that much money, California could provide real rehabilitation. It could teach web design, coding, electrical work, plumbing, automotive repair, construction, welding, digital media, business skills, accounting, logistics, and countless other trades. It could create structured environments where people leave jail or prison with actual tools to live lawful, productive lives.

Instead, the system provides little that is meaningful.

There are a few rehabilitation programs, but many are more appearance than substance. Some programs may shorten a sentence or create the impression of reform by offering basic GED-style education. But a GED in a hostile dorm environment is not the same as serious education. It does not provide hands-on trade skills. It does not build a career. It does not create dignity. It does not meaningfully prepare people to support themselves and give the means to those who thought they never had the opportunity to learn.

Real rehabilitation would require an environment designed for learning.
The current system is designed for containment.

Real rehabilitation would give people tools.
The current system gives people labels.

Real rehabilitation would reduce recidivism.
The current system profits when people come back.

That is the contradiction. If the state truly wanted fewer people in jail, it would invest heavily in skills, education, housing stability, mental health support, and reentry. Instead, the incentives point the other way. Keep people trapped. Keep people unskilled. Keep people labeled. Keep people cycling through courts, jails, probation, treatment programs, and institutional supervision.

Police then have an incentive to pad charges. A minor event can be inflated into something far more serious. A small infraction can become a narrative of danger. A person who jaywalks, argues, reacts, or appears inconvenient can be written into a much larger story. The longer the person is held, the more money flows through the system. I have witnessed it over and over. To others as well as with myself.

That is why I view the CARE Act, mental illness labeling, police scanner chatter, courtroom hearsay, and incarceration policy as part of the same structure. They are all packaged as safety or help, just as NSA surveillance is packaged as national security, COINTELPRO was packaged as protection, and Vault 7-style cyber power is packaged as intelligence capability.

The label says help.
The function is control.
The result is profit.

The Sham of Rehabilitation

California’s so-called rehabilitation programs reveal the fraud. If California can spend roughly six figures per inmate per year, there is no excuse for failing to teach real skills. For that amount of money, inmates could receive structured education, practical training, apprenticeships, technology access, and reentry support.

Instead, many are pushed deeper down the hole.

The system does not appear to want people to become healthy and independent. It appears to want them dependent, broken, labeled, and profitable. A person who learns a trade, gets a job, supports a family, builds a business, or becomes stable is no longer useful to the incarceration economy. A person who fails, relapses, violates probation, or gets arrested again is financially useful.

That is the moral inversion. The state claims to rehabilitate while benefiting from failure.

Legal and Ethical Violations against me

The conduct I describe implicates numerous legal and constitutional protections.

Relevant federal laws include:

18 U.S.C. § 241 — conspiracy against rights.
18 U.S.C. § 242 — deprivation of rights under color of law.

Potentially relevant California laws include:

California Penal Code § 646.9 — stalking.
California Penal Code § 422 — criminal threats.
California Penal Code § 182 — criminal conspiracy.
California Civil Code § 52.1, the Bane Act — interference with rights by threats, intimidation, or coercion.

Attorney conduct may implicate:

California Business and Professions Code § 6068 — duties of attorneys.
California Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 1.1 — competence.
Rule 1.3 — diligence.

Constitutional protections implicated include:

The First Amendment, protecting speech and expression.
The Fourth Amendment, protecting privacy and security against unreasonable intrusion.
The Sixth Amendment, protecting the right to counsel and a fair trial.
The Fourteenth Amendment, protecting due process and equal protection.

The overall picture is not law and order. It is law being inverted into a weapon.

The Role of Hate, Power, and Scapegoating

At the root of this campaign is hate. The message is that Kevin Perelman is inferior and therefore does not deserve the protection of law. That is why people can justify stalking, lying, provoking, gaslighting, labeling, and courtroom misconduct. They do not see the target as a full citizen.

This is also about scapegoating. A political system can use a target like me as an example. It can manufacture a crisis, create a label, claim intervention is necessary, and then use that story to justify new laws, new budgets, new powers, and new political capital.

In that sense, my life becomes a political tool. Destroy Kevin Perelman, make him look crazy or like it’s his personality or like it’s his fault, claim the system works, then use the manufactured example to justify CARE Act expansion, mental health courts, forced treatment, more funding, more police power, more judicial power, and more institutional control.

That is why this is bigger than one person. My case exposes a model.

Punishing Health and Productivity

One of the strongest proofs of malicious intent is the reaction to my attempts to improve. If I were truly the problem, then my becoming healthier, calmer, more productive, and more independent should reduce concern. But the opposite happens.

The more I try to live like everyone else, the more anger I see from family members, police, government actors, psychological authorities, and organized harassment groups. That means they are not responding to danger. They are responding to the failure of their narrative.

A healthy Kevin Perelman disproves the label.
A productive Kevin Perelman disproves the story.
A stable Kevin Perelman threatens the entire operation.

That is why they need provocation. They need reaction. They need stress. They need isolation. They need humiliation. They need to make life unlivable, then point to the effects of that abuse as proof that the abuse is justified.

This is circular cruelty.

Conclusion: The Only Real Defense Is Exposure

The dark genius of this system is its ability to make abuse look like concern. It makes surveillance look like safety. It makes coercion look like care. It makes legal abandonment look like procedure. It makes psychiatric labeling look like science. It makes profit look like rehabilitation. It makes hate look like public order.

But once the pattern is visible, the disguise begins to fail.

If the state has to provoke a person to make him look unstable, then the state has no real case.
If police have to fabricate or exaggerate, then the evidence is not there.
If prosecutors have to rely on hearsay and emotional coercion, then the facts are weak.
If defense attorneys refuse to defend, then the trial is not fair.
If judges ignore the misconduct, then the court is not neutral.
If mental health laws are used to bypass due process, then they are not compassion.
If incarceration money is not reinvested into real rehabilitation, then the system is not trying to solve crime. It is feeding on it.

The legal progress represented by O’Connor v. Donaldson, Conservatorship of Roulet, Conservatorship of Susan T., Conservatorship of Guerrero, and Conservatorship of Wendland must not be reversed by modern political opportunism. Those cases recognize that labels are dangerous when combined with government power. They recognize that liberty matters. They recognize that due process matters. They recognize that a human being cannot be erased by accusation alone.

California now stands at a crossroads. It can continue moving toward dignity, evidence, rehabilitation, autonomy, and rights — or it can regress into a system where psychiatric labels, police narratives, court coercion, and political profit decide who gets to remain free.

My case is a warning.

When a society allows one person to be dehumanized, stalked, labeled, silenced, and financially exploited, it creates the machinery to do the same to anyone. Especially with a WORLDWIDE operation across 49 years to eradicate at all costs investing insane amounts of government dollars over lack of a few eyebrow hairs or some 5 year old anxiety.

The only real defense is exposure: sunlight, documentation, legal accountability, public awareness, and a refusal to let “help” become the mask worn by hate, profit, and control.

Is this the Government You want in the LAND OF THE FREE? To take away all the FREEDOMS?

Only you can make this world safe for your children

We the people for the people, And anyone who supports this what is going on, IS NOT AMERICAN

Table of Contents (as bold headers)

1. Introduction: The Hate Cage & www.KevinPerelmanTarget.com
2. Childhood Targeting and the DSM-5 Labeling
3. Fabrication, Police & Community Complicity
4. Eradication Tactics, Brainwashing, and Global Mobbing
5. Gaslighting, Retaliation, and Threats
6. Social, Emotional, and Legal Isolation
7. Global Conspiracy: Watch Lists, Smear Campaigns, and Hate Cages
8. The Role of Family and Professional Jealousy
9. Privacy Violation and Psychological Warfare
10. Illegal Profiling and Mental Illness Labeling
11. Judicial Corruption and Systemic Retaliation
12. Police/Security Company Operations and Frame Jobs
13. Proven Public Defamation and Denial of Protection
14. Repetition of Abuse and Indifference
15. Civil Liberties Destroyed & Loss of Constitutional Rights
16. The Impact of Edward Snowden’s Revelations
17. Coordinated Stalking & Technology Abuse
18. Hate Groups, Vigilantes, and Public Execution
19. The Judicial System Hoax and Its True Motives
20. Worldwide Silence: What the Public Was Told
21. Spiritual and Emotional Aftermath
22. Conclusion: A Stark Warning—The True Danger of the Hate Cage

---

1. Introduction: The Hate Cage

 www.KevinPerelmanTarget.com

The Hate Cage

(United States Government, Police, Judicial System Eradication Operations with the Psychology Community – Riling the masses WORLDWIDE to hunt and kill or eradicate a 5-year-old child with MENTAL ILLNESS Cover-Up Labels and their ON-GOING operations)

(The Life Of Kevin Perelman and the Government, Police, Psychology Community with the masses worldwide, Stalking Operations, and his Family’s OBSESSED DELUSIONAL Hate and Rage against him)

Remember: NOTHING is unprovoked!

This person has exercised being a very stable, really well-grounded, open-minded, friendly person his entire life, and yet it didn’t matter in the eyes of the Government, Psychology Community or Judicial System hunting him with the masses helping them hunt 5-year-old children.

What happens when a family wants to throw their 5-year-old in the trash because he’s not PERFECT, with lack of eyebrow hair, based on the DSM-5 book of psychological labeling?

So they need to remove him from society by making up lies with the Police, Psychology Community, and Government, with the masses to get away with it.

What methods are used to remove that child from the WORLD in ways that make it look like it’s the child’s fault, and try to BRAINWASH him into thinking it’s his fault and he suffers from mental illness, to cover up the original Psychological labels in 1977 as well, to cover up the fact that the entire situation is driven out of pure HATE, FEAR, RAGE, and inability to understand anything different than themselves because that child was not what they wanted, or is exercising the ability to think for himself, showing the same ANGER, HATE, FEAR, that Adolf Hitler himself had towards the Jewish people.

There cannot, on any level, no matter what, be an admission that the original labeling about obsession, anger, schizophrenia, were all bunk labels and lies. He is met with unfathomable retaliation for even trying to address their concerns. That simply is not true or is based on someone else’s projection onto Kevin Perelman.

Using lies and fabrications with the Police, Government, and Psychology Community, while that family and those helping, project themselves on that child, fabricating such lies that the child is filled with Rage, and is a Violent Paranoid Schizophrenic to REMOVE HIM FROM SOCIETY with clear and obvious MOTIVE. Saying what they need to say, to get what they want (The Common Hardened Criminal), and blasting these lies WORLDWIDE with the Police, Government, Security Companies, Judicial System, Psychology Community, Communities, in an agenda to ERADICATE at all costs. In a mass global mobbing based on United States community network terror cells across the Internet starting in 1994 against a single child for 54 years.

No matter how many times, attempts by Kevin Perelman are made by anyone, whether it be the family, the police, the psychology community, the mass worldwide angry, enraged mobs, there is not only lack of communication, but flat out anger and rage for asking the question, “What is going on?”, “Why won’t you stop?”, “Why are you so mad at me?”

The reactions are met with Death Threats, Laughs, Snickers, and masked hostility that you’re imagining the daily instigation, privacy violations, and attacks to create the appearance of mental instability. Not concern.

In 2001, Michael Patrick Huntley, one of the ringleaders since Kevin was 14 years old, upon finding out, was asked this question: “Mike, what the hell is going on?” And the response with pure HATE and RAGE with Paul Humphrey, another stalking friend who worked with LAPD in 1998, in these stalking operations was,

“I’ve given you enough rope to hang yourself with,”
“We are using the Judicial System Against you,”
“You had better live a careful life,”
“You are too out of control for California,”
“World of Paranoia,”
“It’s your behavior.”

Indirect threats and messages about defaming his name to the largest circles possible in movie reference lines.

And placing papers in front of him on his office desk at Signet-e Services, the company Mike Huntley wanted to start with him, talking about control and killing in South Korea by their Government.

At the same time, Mike Huntley was working with LAPD and Kevin’s Gym manager to try to get Kevin to take a trash bag of LAPD confiscated Marijuana with LAPD, as setup and frame jobs to lock him away out of hate trying to frame him as a drug dealer with LAPD and Ron Perelman.

This was the turning point in Kevin Perelman’s life, coming out of college with passion and inspiration while working for visual FX studios with his College Background in Art, Computers, Programming, while Michael Patrick Huntley wanted to start an Internet Host Provider, called Signet-e Services.

This is the point where his life changed, noticing the Psychology Community and Police were being given fabricated Psychological labels before ever having any contact with them or the majority of most interactions, whether it be the scared or enraged looks on their faces. But at no point is Kevin Perelman ever allowed to have an honest dialogue with any of these people about the situation and how it started and escalated like wildfire.

Showing clear and obvious motive to eradicate, and not resolve the situation, with nonstop emotional blackmail and illegal arrests, forged fraudulent police reports made from person after person while trying to instigate nonstop from place to place to create a forged and fraudulent cover-up paper trail of instability and mental illness, so that there is no investigation into what had happened to Kevin Perelman once he disappeared.

What happens to that child’s life as he grows up, not knowing he is targeted for ERADICATION/ASSASSINATION, with a conspiring planet of fear-mongered anonymous strangers trying to PROVOKE him to death or make it look like he is chasing or obsessed with people, with Police and Government setup and frame job operations that go on daily for 53 years, with no admission that this WORLDWIDE event is occurring?

Meanwhile, he walks around in isolation watching his own Government and family, with the masses, HUNT and TERRORIZE him for no reason other than their HATE and RAGE for imperfection since he was 5 years old (1977), while he is told he has to give coerced false confessions if he wants to live the same life as everyone else.

What happens to that 29-year-old when he finds out something is very wrong with his life, that he didn’t know was going on?

When his friends aren’t really his friends, but rather his jailers, involved in a mass WORLDWIDE conspiracy to eradicate at all costs with MENTAL ILLNESS label COVER-UPS?

And wherever he goes, strangers want him dead for no reason, and he’s not allowed to say anything about it or especially ask any questions, or his life will be threatened even more with increasing WORLDWIDE Mental Illness attacks as they try to create the appearance of Anxiety or some kind of rare unheard of mental illness.

Larger and larger groups hunt him to kill or eradicate him with the POLICE, escalating the rate simply because he wants to know the truth and have the same life as everyone else, the life he thought he had.

Paid-off thug police officers like Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinse of the Topanga Division are actively stalking alongside these WORLDWIDE indoctrinated STALKING mobs, in a quest to FORCE people into mental facilities out of their own HATE and INSECURITY, in a coordinated WORLDWIDE operation from which Kevin can’t get away.

No matter how much proof—on video or otherwise—is shown to them, they refuse to look. No matter how obvious, they refuse to acknowledge reality, instead taking part in the verbal provocations and harassments to try to create a false perception of mental illness and instability.

Kevin found that his life was simply a fake cloak of WORLDWIDE insecurity, hostility, fear, and PURE HATRED for him, while he accepts everyone with open arms. He helps everyone in his path, driven by his passions for capitalistic ideals, education, and his background, striving to accomplish wonderful endeavors based on originality, creativity, and innovation—providing a good life for himself while helping those around him, just like most people who strive to achieve. This makes his family and the government enraged.

Coming to the realization that almost every stranger he has met since he was 5 years old is involved in a mass WORLDWIDE conspiracy, fueled by the first 24 years of fabrications and lies spewed across the entire United States of America and world, upon finding out in 2001.

It is based on illegal government MENTAL ILLNESS WATCH LISTS, internet-based propaganda, smear campaigns, whisper campaigns, and the use of the Internet to coordinate out-of-context information to the masses—basically “KILL systems”—to indirectly and without physical touch deteriorate someone’s health until they no longer exist or are put in a HATE CAGE (jail cell or mental facility). It is designed to EXTERMINATE at all costs by riling the masses against him in secret, without the target ever being allowed to know what he is even accused of or why he’s being HUNTED, or to tell his side of the story based on fabricated accusations.

Exactly as Michael Patrick Huntley’s Death Threats stated—“World of Paranoia”—with statements from his father Ronald Perelman and Mike Huntley like, “You are not allowed to defend yourself.” At no point is he directly told what these imaginary crimes are.

The family, police, and psychology community do this to create the illusion of obsessional looping, schizophrenia, paranoia, and to change labels—whether criminal or psychological and nonstop setup and frame jobs with the masses and Police to lock him away for no real reason—while the target keeps wondering why they won’t stop attacking him and leave him alone, or address their real concerns, which amount to nothing more than a lack of eyebrow hair and a quest to design perfect human beings, like Adolf Hitler.

The message is: Kevin is the inferior race, and everyone else stalking him, especially the authority figures, are the superior race, while cloaking their bigoted hate and rage behind laughs, snickering, and calling it teases.

This is by DESIGN—by the PSYCHOLOGY COMMUNITY, POLICE, and GOVERNMENT—to execute or eradicate, using PSYCHOLOGY as a weapon.

With endless psychological warfare tactics based on Internet and non-Internet privacy violations, uniting mass angry mobs across the internet to conspire and coordinate disinformation.

They are told to wait, follow, or create nonstop patterned terror behaviors to instigate and try to get reactions from the target—creating fraudulent and forged paper trails with the police to cover up their mass crime spree.

Also known as Gang Stalking or Gaslighting.

The communities are left with one verbal and non-verbal message: “We are going to hunt you to KILL or ERADICATE you, and you don’t talk or we will HUNT you and KILL you or ERADICATE you.” They are STOPPING him from having the same life as everyone else.

(An Execution by the Public.)

Showing that this person, since age 5, was never even classified as a human being.

His constitutional rights and protections were stolen from him based on government PROFILING and he was treated from day one like a monster—who never did anything wrong. Not that a 5-year-old really could.

At no point was he ever protected by the Constitution of the United States of America.

This shows that what the government has always told people about FREEDOMS and DEMOCRACY is a blatant lie—to make them feel secure, even though they are not safe from them.

This is the very SECRET they don’t want anyone talking about, so that their country believes in them instead of QUESTIONING what is going on behind the closed doors of Congress, the Senate, the White House, and government agencies like the National Security Agency (NSA), and what they truly do that isn’t on the news—in this tight-knit power structure driven by special interest groups, money, and control.

The people flock like sheep, listening to drama on the news about trivial things that don’t matter, but never focus on the things that actually do—especially when it comes to people’s rights, safety, and basic dignity, which so often becomes their entertainment, while the U.S. government, police, psychology community, and security companies are committing acts beyond any level of illegality and criminality known to man.

Hypocritically, the system babbles about how “the end justifies the means.”

What happens when this person, hunted by the police and these hate groups that are indoctrinated into their eradication cults, can piece enough of his life together and finally forms an opinion about the WORLDWIDE lies used to fear-monger the masses against him in a global eradication agenda?

What happens when it’s made to look like a harmless, systematic, repetitive billions of worldwide “teases” per day—in secret and non-direct ways—to create the appearance of paranoia and schizophrenia by these paranoid psychotics, given “kill tools” by the government to eliminate him?

They try to justify what they are doing by some kind of sick “shock collar” behavior modification, always refusing to confront their own psychotic and criminal behaviors.

The United States government is using psychology as a weapon to hunt, kill, or eradicate—Adolf Hitler’s next level of warfare, trickling down to the KKK and adopted by the police, security companies, and neighborhood watch groups.

These communities preach peaceful neighborhoods while, together with the police, they stalk, hunt, and kill the good people they don’t like, or are simply afraid of—creating a war zone of chaos and criminal behavior, then blaming it all on the target/victim with the judicial system’s hate, while profiling them to justify their crime spree.

Also known as gaslighting, gang stalking, community harassment groups, or cause stalking.

In all of these, the police and their political allies are behind it, covering it up by accusing the very victim they are hunting—working to kill or force into cages, for no legitimate reason, entirely by design.

Their real statement is simply that they don’t care about Kevin’s life, and nobody wants to know the truth—while they run a worldwide, minute-by-minute obsessed stalking operation to eradicate him, based on thousands of defamatory fabrications and daily gaslighting tactics.

They are obsessed and can’t let go, all while claiming they don’t care. Obviously, they care deeply, are angry about something, and have been hunting and stalking him since he was five years old, refusing to stop until he is dead or gone for no real reason—other than protecting the secrets of what they started in 1977.

They pretend what they are doing is just teasing or a game: methods to kill, and get away with it, without an investigation.

This is designed to kill a five-year-old, in these methods, by the government of the United States of America and by the psychology community.

Since no one worldwide is coming forward with honesty, it proves that what they are really doing is hunting and attempting to kill a person in an unheard-of coordinated method.

The only question left is, “What were the people across the United States and the world told, and how did the United States government do this—uniting the majority of the planet, led by depraved people, in the name of control, or supporters who’ll hunt and kill for them out of hate?”

This is something that will be analyzed for centuries to come, based on social dynamics, once the truth is out.

This is what fuels the police, psychology community, security companies, and the worldwide terror and stalking network of vigilantes, all helping in this sick cause to kill or eradicate a five-year-old Jewish person based on random statements like, “He scares me,” even though they have never met him.

These are empty, racist, bigoted judgments from day one, and especially with the judicial system and government, directed toward a five-year-old.

---

10. Illegal Profiling and Mental Illness Labeling
(Section label inserted only; content below remains intact.)

Illegal Monitoring of Children, Police Profiling, and Lifelong Surveillance

• ILLEGAL profiling and UNETHICAL FAMILY labeling by a psychotic and jealous art therapist mother and a father with an additional psychology degree, both taking out their anger and rage on a child instead of embracing art and creativity from others. Enraged with jealousy at every piece of artwork created by Kevin Perelman. Working with the police to make it appear as if Kevin is conforming to media or confessing to something, driven by PURE HATE and RAGE to eradicate someone and get away with it. Normally, people wouldn’t care about art in this negative way—like Adolf Hitler killing for reading books and enjoying it.

• Trying to make the target look like he’s conforming to media, people, or is schizophrenic.

• Privacy violation in unheard-of ways, both on and off the internet, with conspiracy worldwide groups of anonymous strangers collecting and using this data with these groups to stalk.

• Using citizens to hunt, kill, or eradicate those they don’t like, hiding behind security companies, so when the targets go to the police, the police protect their stalking groups through Block Commanders and Neighborhood Watch groups, empowering these vigilante hate armies to stalk. Anything out of the norm or not to their liking is deemed “crazy” or needing eradication. Example: “He took a walk at night. I’m afraid of him. He needs to be removed from society.”

• ILLEGAL mental illness watch lists, notifying communities of their theories, fearmongering, and riling the masses against the target.

• ILLEGAL computer and cell phone hacking and privacy violations, using NSA resources to violate Internet privacy and use the information for paranoid schizophrenia tactics by hinting about everything the target does, trying to make it appear as if he suffers from mental illness. Example: if you type something odd into Google, like “Yellow Beetle,” your computer neighbors might walk up to you when you go out and say, “I like VW’s too,” and this is done over and over daily as you test the waters. It’s a form of psychological warfare to eradicate—by making the victim appear paranoid or schizophrenic—while they use Brian Longbotham SPY GAME tactics (Brian hired Kevin to work at Universal Studios on a pilot called “Spy Game”), or ideas of reference hinting about everything you do. And of course, it’s never directly stated, while they tell you they don’t know who you are, especially if they’re working with the LAPD Neighborhood Watch, Block Commanders, who are reporting back to the lead officers. This shows it’s not mental illness but the use of psychology as a weapon to eradicate at all costs out of hate.

• Illegal psychological labeling in the police systems—categorization.

• Police using their global systems to defame and discredit across the United States. For example, the LAPD has been broadcasting on their computer system that Kevin Perelman is a public nuisance—PROVEN!—and countless other fabricated accusations to cover up their crime spree against him. So when he needs to report a crime against himself anywhere in the United States, they refuse to protect and serve. Each local police department, no matter where he is, works with these citizen kill groups to hunt and eradicate him anywhere in the United States.

• Police refusal to stop crimes against the target or offer help if they don’t like the target—along with Internal Affairs. It doesn’t matter how much video footage is provided to them, photos and videos. A girl tries to slice Kevin up with a knife, someone with a police-trained K9 shreds his leg, while they write penal code 187 on his car with a girl named Victoria Walker, and criminal defense attorney Michael Bialys sent after him with his Visual FX supervisor Brian Longbotham, while he was suing Modern Video Film for breach of contract. These people befriend Kevin only for extremely large entities with unlimited money to take part in hunting and stalking him for no reason.

• Illegal trials and judicial operations, making sure the target can’t prove innocence in courtrooms no matter how much direct proof exists—with paid-off judges, or judges who all want these crimes covered up so that what was started when he was five years old by the judicial system, police, and government, never comes out in public.

• Government and police retaliation and stalking for getting proof of the crimes against him. In 2013 at Encino Starbucks, Kevin was approached by a police officer named Officer Toro who threatened his life for having proof of their angry mobs hunting him to kill or eradicate him. This death threat—which leads officer Charles Sean Dinse of LAPD is actively carrying out—was, “If you ever take a picture of a person, I will exercise the law in my own way.” Van Nuys Courthouse on three illegal trials is protecting these operations through Internal Affairs. These are government and United States-based assassinations, with operations going all the way to the top. These aren’t just local, psychotic police officers torturing and killing young children for 49 years with mental illness labeling cover-ups; these are government assassination operations. Since this has been happening since 1977 for Kevin, it has grown exponentially due to more LAPD death threats, the more Kevin found out and had an opinion or tried to get help.

• Illegal gaslighting operations—psychological terror and torture operations based on privacy violations, to send people schizophrenia messages called “ideas of reference.” It is the equivalent of mental rape. In other words, they are violating privacy (as in the VW example above). And when the target expresses discomfort and asks them to stop, but they tell the target “NO”—like with the dog attacker and the police-trained K9, Detective Ruiz, Detective Shapiro, Detective Angela Stuart, lead officer Sean Dinse, all told to threaten Kevin’s life and stalk him both locally and worldwide with networked terror cells. Doesn’t “NO” mean no? When the target doesn’t want privacy violations and psychotic hints—“I know you did this, I know you did that, I know you went here.” Direct threats like “It’s your transgressions”; “You know what you did”; “You had better accept what’s going on or it will get a lot worse for you” and countless others. The LAPD and dog attackers’ death threats while shredding his leg: “Previously stated by him, you had better accept what’s going on or it will get a lot worse for you,” showing they are hunting to kill using Adolf Hitler’s psychological warfare tactics.

As Kevin possesses over 80 terabytes of photo, video, and much more for the world to see. LAPD has threatened Kevin’s life over and over for getting proof of their murder operations to kill five-year-old Jewish children. If someone doesn’t like someone, they ask them to leave them alone. If they say no, and worldwide groups are stalking, harassing, and provoking Kevin since he was five—finding out at 29—the message is clear. This message is from the Police, the Judicial System, Kevin’s Family, the Psychology Community, United Worldwide Security Companies, and a planet of vigilante civilians helping hunt to kill or eradicate a five-year-old Jewish child who has spent 25 years asking what is going on since 2001. And the only consistent response is, “YOU DON’T TALK OR WE KILL YOU” in various forms while stalking has continued since age five.

If they don’t stop, they try to prvoke nonstop, and collect reactions to set up and frame the target and victim, Kevin Perelman to exterminate by turning around the situation on the victim. The Judicial System lies about it, saying Kevin is imagining things—especially with Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinse. They will not admit evidence, no matter how obvious, and how much proof there is. The Judicial Employees even prvoke and instigate with the same tactics trying to get reactions within the courtroom or courthouse as frame job operations while, showing they are involved and know what’s going on. Just like trying to file police reports which they water down and suppress to stop a paper trail of honesty from happening.

This shows that several of these authority figures are probably getting paid to hunt and kill or eradicate, by trying to mentally rape someone into reactions and covering it up by claiming the person suffers from mental illness, especially someone with a history of the opposite: college educated, visual FX artist for Hollywood (Modern Video Film, Universal Studios), IT computer networking from server builds, RAID arrays, internet security, firewalling, web development like .Net, Transact SQL programming, graphics design, operating systems (Linux, Windows), mail servers (Nginx, Apache, Ubuntu, Microsoft, and a lot more).

There is nothing close to mental illness other than at age 29, meeting the LAPD, psychology community, family, and judicial death threats, with business partner Mike Patrick Huntley, paid off to hunt, kill, or eradicate Kevin starting at age 14, with Paul Humphrey, who joined LAPD in 1988—brother of Joe Humphrey—linked to Jason Perelman and Jennifer Pilchick Perelman. While they with Gym Manager Rodie Morales was trying to get me to take a trash bag of police confiscated marijuana to frame me as a drug dealer.

To whose PERCEPTION? (Michael Patrick Huntley and Anita Perelman: “It’s your behavior”)

The Police, Government, Judicial System, Psychology Community, Security Companies, and these mass vigilante civilian groups try to cover all of this up and sweep it under the rug with mental illness labeling so that there are no loose ends on this execution, or on an investigation of an unprecedented scale and unheard-of crime against a single person across 54 years.

This is still going on as we speak. The Judicial System will not allow any aspect of the TRUTH to come to light about Kevin Perelman, with mass ongoing attacks designed to create the appearance of instability—to make Kevin look “crazy” for some reason—because they don’t want to be known for what they really are and what they are doing to people based on profiling.

They don’t want United States citizens knowing what they are capable of doing to their own people out of their paranoia, control issues, fear, and insecurity—things that Edward Snowden exposed with the NSA.

Good people are DYING or DISAPPEARING because of these government and police stalking operations. They end up homeless, on the streets trying to survive while being stalked, swept up, and forced into jails, prisons, and mental facilities—falling through the cracks.

It is made to appear that it’s about incurable mental illnesses that put them in these hate cages for life, but these operations are BY DESIGN, created by the United States Government for whistleblowers, for people who are too smart or who think for themselves, for those who discover long-standing government investigations on them and who have no constitutional protections, and for people who dare to question aspects of our government.

COINTELPRO (short for Counter Intelligence Program) was a series of secret FBI operations run mainly from 1956 to 1971 aimed at monitoring, infiltrating, disrupting, and discrediting domestic political organizations the FBI viewed as “subversive.”

It targeted a wide range of groups—most famously civil rights organizations (including Martin Luther King Jr.), Black liberation groups (like the Black Panther Party), anti–Vietnam War activists, socialists/communists, and some white supremacist groups too. Tactics included surveillance, informants, spreading rumors and forged letters, provoking internal conflict, harassment via employers/landlords, and coordination that could lead to arrests or public smears.

The program became publicly known after activists burglarized an FBI office in 1971 and leaked documents; later investigations (notably the Church Committee in the mid-1970s) condemned it as abusive and unconstitutional in many instances.

It’s covered up by mental illness labeling to make it seem like it was the victim’s fault. When in fact, if these stalking groups operating with police were not happening, these people—like Kevin Perelman—would have very successful lives.

Kevin Perelman is living proof of what Edward Snowden exposed, but on a much more demented level with the psychology community.

These are government flag-and-kill operations based on profiling. Edward Snowden sacrificed his freedoms for the public—and most people don’t even understand its importance or what they’re involved in. Or they’re too consumed in their own guilt to come forward and admit it’s going on, and that they screwed up; they’re unwilling to expose and stop what needs to be stopped for the good of humanity.

They are EMPOWERING the government and police to continue and ramp up for the next wave of technology, making things a billion times worse for U.S. citizens, freedoms, and safety.

And when the police empower these civilian kill groups to hunt, they’re ENDANGERING ALL lives—even though Kevin Perelman is the main target of a GLOBAL WORLDWIDE MURDER operation.

These coordinated stalking groups, with the police using the Internet, Wifi Hacking, Computer Hacking, GPS, cell phone tracking, and neighborhood coordination to collect and distribute private information from the target to the masses wherever he goes, are reinforcing the destruction of any aspect of the Constitution of the United States of America and the foundation that holds everyone together. The ONLY THING keeping people safe from the tyranny of their own government by doing what the government is telling them to take part in.

“Government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the Earth.”

Why is one person exposing this 49-year crime spree such a threat? Because that information threatens the tyrants who don’t want to lose control of their reckless endangerment to the people—people just trying to get food on the table and shelter over their heads.

YOU ARE NOT SAFE from the United States Government! YOU ARE NOT PROTECTED by the United States Government!

If people don’t speak out about Kevin Perelman, and demand proper checks and balances for their own safety, they are asking for it to get worse for themselves. And when they finally find out—just like Edward Snowden said—it will be way too late, and Kevin’s life is the perfect example.

While this is not an absolute opinion, the Judicial System is a hoax and is does not seem to be meant to protect people anymore.

While there is no simple solution to a complex problem, In Kevin’s experience, and maybe because it is the definition of his life, they seem to be more interested in their own personal agendas, and making money off of people while piling on fake fraudulent charges and threatening lives, warning that people had better not tell anyone while they hunt and stalk with these illegal operations. Good people’s lives are being destroyed over hate, greed, insecurity, and fear, while they steal tax-paying dollars and do it more from incentive.

And when these people—connected at the highest levels of authority—befriend Kevin and enter his life, extremely large entities with unlimited money take part in hunting and stalking him for no real reason other then the fear of a young child pulling some eyebrow hairs. Illegal trials and judicial operations are held to make sure Kevin can’t prove innocence in courtrooms, no matter how much direct proof exists, with paid-off judges or judges who all want these crimes covered up—ensuring that what was started when Kevin was five years old, by the judicial system, police, and government, never gets out in the open and to the people.

Police refusal to stop crimes against Kevin or to help him, if they don’t like him, and with Internal Affairs, means it doesn’t matter how much video footage, photos, or proof is provided. A girl trying to slice Kevin up with a knife, a person with a police-trained K9 shredding his leg, someone writing Penal Code 187 on his car with a girl named Victoria Walker, and her boyfriend criminal defense attorney Michael Bialys sent after him with his Visual FX supervisor Brian Longbotham, all while he was suing Modern Video Film for breach of contract.

Also involved: corporations such as Universal Studios, property owner Rick Caruso, and Brian Longbotham, all heavily involved in these stalking’s, the City of Thousand Oaks Civic Center, and many other large corporations in frame-job operations with the LAPD and worldwide anonymous strangers who think they know him.

Police broadcast defamatory information using their global systems to defame and discredit Kevin across the United States. For example, the LAPD has been blasting on the police computer system that Kevin Perelman is a public nuisance—PROVEN!—and they have spread countless other defamatory statements to cover up their crime spree against him, so when he reports a crime against himself anywhere, the authorities refuse to protect or serve.

Each local police department, no matter where Kevin is, works with these citizen kill groups to hunt and kill or eradicate him anywhere in the United States. Their only real message is that they don’t care about his life, and nobody wants to know about the truth, even while they run a worldwide, daily, minute-by-minute obsessed stalking operation to eradicate him at all costs—based on thousands of defamatory fabrications and daily gaslighting tactics.

In reality, they are obsessed with him and can’t let go, while publicly claiming not to care. Obviously they do care, and they are angry about something—having hunted and stalked him since he was five years old, refusing to stop until he is dead or gone for no reason other than the secret and labeling they started in 1977. They pretend what they are doing is just teasing or a game—methods to kill and get away with it, without an investigation. Deliberately designed to kill a five-year-old in these methods, by the U.S. Government and psychology community.

Because no one worldwide is coming forward with honesty, it proves that what they are doing is to hunt and kill—using an unheard-of, coordinated method. Now the only question is, what were people across the United States and the world told, and how did the United States government do this—uniting most of the planet, led by depraved people, in the name of control or as supporters, to hunt and kill for them out of hate? This is something that will be analyzed for centuries to come, based on social dynamics, once the truth is out.

This is what fuels the police, psychology community, security companies, and the worldwide terror and stalking network of vigilantes who all help with this sick cause to kill or eradicate a five-year-old Jewish person based solely on random statements like “He scares me,” even though they’ve never met him. These are empty, racist, bigoted judgments from day one—and especially with the judicial system and government—used against a five-year-old.

Because no one worldwide is coming forward with honesty, it proves that what they are doing is to hunt and kill—using an unheard-of, coordinated method. Now the only question is, what were people across the United States and the world told, and how did the United States government do this—uniting most of the planet, led by depraved people, in the name of control or as supporters, to hunt and kill for them out of hate? This is something that will be analyzed for centuries to come, based on social dynamics, once the truth is out.

This is what fuels the police, psychology community, security companies, and the worldwide terror and stalking network of vigilantes who all help with this sick cause to kill or eradicate a five-year-old Jewish person based solely on random statements like “He scares me,” even though they’ve never met him. These are empty, racist, bigoted judgments from day one—and especially with the judicial system and government and psychology community—used against a five-year-old.

Illegal monitoring of children, police profiling, and surveillance means that everything Kevin did was watched and collected. There was and is illegal profiling and unethical family labeling from a psychotic and jealous art therapist mother and a father with a secondary psychology degree. His mother took out her anger and rage on her child, instead of embracing art and creativity, enraged with jealousy at every piece of artwork Kevin Perelman made still going on today with the masses. Working with the police to make Kevin appear as though he was confessing to something, all was done from pure hate and rage, seeking to eradicate him and get away with it. Yet to this day, he is met with the same hate and rage from art to pretty much anything else he does. Normally, people couldn’t care less about art in this negative way—just like Adolf Hitler killed for reading books that weren’t government-approved.

They attempted to make Kevin appear as if he conformed to media, other people, or as if he were schizophrenic. The privacy violations were done in unheard-of ways, both on and off the Internet, with worldwide groups of anonymous strangers, collecting and distributing data, using these groups to stalk.

Citizens are used as hunters, killers, or “eradication officers,” hiding behind security companies. If the targeted person went to the police for help, the police will protect their own stalking groups, with Block Commanders and Neighborhood Watch groups empowering these vigilante hate armies to stalk. Anything out of the norm, or simply not to their liking, is deemed crazy or needing eradication. For example: “He took a walk at night, I’m afraid of him”—so, he needs to be removed from society.

There were and still are illegal trials and judicial operations designed to ensure the target can’t prove innocence in courtrooms or anywhere else, no matter how much direct proof existed—using paid-off judges or judges who wanted these crimes covered up, so what was started when Kevin was five years old by the judicial system, police, and government would never become public.

There is nonstop, ongoing government and police retaliation and stalking for getting proof of the crimes against Kevin. In 2013 at Encino Starbucks, Kevin was approached by a police officer known as Officer Toro, who threatened his life for having proof of their angry mobs hunting him to kill or eradicate him. This death threat—which lead officer Charles Sean Dinse of LAPD is actively carrying out—was: “If you ever take a picture of a person, I will exercise the law in my own way.” At Van Nuys Courthouse, during three illegal trials, authorities protected these illegal operations with Internal Affairs. These are government and United States–based assassination operations, going all the way to the top. These aren’t just local psychotic police officers who get their jollies torturing and killing young children over 49 years with mental illness labeling cover-ups; these are government assassination operations. Since this has been going on since 1977 for Kevin, it has grown exponentially due to the LAPD death threats that escalated as he found out more and demanded answers amongst the mass mobbing’s or tried to get help to stop what still persists.

There were and are illegal gaslighting operations—psychological terror and torture based on privacy violations, sending people schizophrenic messages called “ideas of reference.” It is the equivalent of mental rape. In other words, they are violating privacy (as in the VW example). And when the target expresses the desire for it to stop, they respond “NO”—like with the dog attacker and the police-trained K9, Detective Ruiz, Detective Shapiro, Detective Angela Stuart, and lead officer Sean Dinse with many others, who all threatened Kevin’s life and are stalking him both locally and through worldwide terror cells. Doesn’t “NO” mean NO? The target expresses dislike of the privacy violations and psychotic hints—“I know you did this. I know you did that. I know you went here.” They send direct threats: “It’s your transgressions.” “You know what you did.” “You had better accept what’s going on or it will get a lot worse for you,” and countless others.

The LAPD and dog attackers’ death threats while shredding Kevin’s leg—“You had better accept what’s going on or it will get a lot worse for you”—show the use of Adolf Hitler psychological warfare tactics by LAPD. Kevin possesses over 80 terabytes of photo, video, and other documentary evidence for the world to see. LAPD has threatened his life repeatedly for accumulating evidence of their daily attacks to kill five-year-old Jewish children. If someone dislikes someone, they ask them to leave them alone. If they refuse, and worldwide stalking, harassing, and provoking has been happening since age five, only realizing it at age 29, then the message is clear. This message comes from the Police, Judicial System, Family, Psychology Community, Worldwide Security Companies, and a planet of vigilante civilians helping to hunt, kill, or eradicate a five-year-old Jewish child who has spent 25 years asking what is going on. The only consistent response: “YOU DON’T TALK OR WE KILL YOU,” while stalking continues since age five. And if they don’t stop, they’re simply trying to provoke reactions, to set up and frame to exterminate—by turning around the situation on the victim and target.

The Judicial System lies, saying Kevin is imagining things, with assistance from Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinse. This shows that several of these authority figures are probably getting paid to hunt and kill or eradicate, trying to mentally rape someone into reactions and cover it up by claiming the victim suffers from mental illness and is violent, and crazy, and claims of being unpredictable to the people as to what he might do. Especially when the person has a history of the opposite—college-educated, visual FX artist for Hollywood (Modern Video Film, Universal Studios), IT computer networking (server builds, RAID arrays, internet security, firewalling, web development like .Net, Transact SQL programming, graphics design, operating systems like Linux, Windows, mail servers Nginx, Apache, Ubuntu, Microsoft—you name it). There is nothing close to mental illness except at age 29, when the LAPD, psychology community, family, and judicial system began death threats, with business partner Michael Patrick Huntley paid off to hunt, kill, or eradicate starting at age 14, joined by Paul Humphrey, who joined LAPD in 1998, younger brother of Joe Humphrey, linked to Jason Perelman and Jennifer Pilchick Perelman.

To whose perception? (Michael Patrick Huntley and Anita Perelman: “It’s your behavior.”)

The Police, Government, Judicial System, Psychology Community, Security Companies, and these mass vigilante civilian groups try to cover all this up and sweep it under the rug with mental illness labeling so there are no loose ends on this execution, or an investigation of an unprecedented scale and unheard-of crime against a single person who is now 54 years old. This is still going on as we speak. The Judicial System will not allow any aspect of the truth to come to light regarding Kevin Perelman, with their ongoing mass attacks designed to create the appearance of instability and to make Kevin seem crazy for some reason. They do not want to be known for what they really are and what they are doing to people based on profiling. They do not want United States citizens to know what they are capable of doing to their own people out of their paranoia, control issues, fear, and insecurity—problems that Edward Snowden exposed with the NSA.

Good people are dying or disappearing because of these government and police stalking operations. They end up homeless, on the streets trying to survive while being stalked, swept up, and forced into jails, prisons, or mental facilities—falling through the cracks—and it is made to appear that it’s all about incurable mental illnesses that put them in these hate cages for life. These operations are by design, created by the United States Government for whistleblowers, for people who are too smart and think for themselves, or who discover they have a decades-long investigation on them and have no constitutional protections. This is for people who dare to question aspects of our government. It’s all covered up by mental illness labeling to make it appear that it was the victim’s fault. When, in fact, if these stalking groups working with the police weren’t happening, these people—like Kevin Perelman—would have very successful lives.

Kevin Perelman is living proof of what Edward Snowden exposed, but on a much more demented level with the psychology community.

These are government flag-and-kill operations based on profiling. Edward Snowden sacrificed his freedoms for us and most people don’t even understand its importance or the depth of their own involvement. Or they are too consumed by their own guilt to come forward and admit what’s going on, that they screwed up and need to expose and stop what needs to be stopped for the good of humanity. Instead, they are empowering the government and police to continue and ramp things up for the next wave of technology to make things a billion times worse for United States citizens, for freedoms, and for safety. When the police empower these civilian kill groups to hunt, they are endangering all lives, even though Kevin Perelman is the main target of a global, worldwide murder operation.

Coordinated stalking groups, with the police using the Internet, GPS, cell phone tracking, neighborhood coordination to collect and distribute private information from authority figures, all reinforce the destruction of the Constitution of the United States of America and the very foundation that holds everyone together—the only thing that keeps all of us safe from the tyranny of our own government.

“Government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the Earth.”

Why is one person exposing this 49-year crime spree against him such a threat? Because that information threatens the tyrants who don’t want to lose control of their reckless endangerment of people who are simply trying to get food on the table and shelter over their heads.

YOU ARE NOT SAFE from the United States Government! YOU ARE NOT PROTECTED by the United States Government!

If people don’t speak out about Kevin Perelman, and demand proper checks and balances for their own safety, they are asking for it to get worse for them. And when they find out—just as Edward Snowden said—it will be way too late. Kevin’s life is a perfect example

In Kevin’s opinion based on his nonstop experiences. the judicial system is a hoax and is not meant to protect people.

While this is not an absolutist view, there is no simple solution to a complex problem, The Police Corruption runs rampant.

They are more interested in making money off of people while piling on fake charges and threatening lives, telling people that they had better not tell anyone while they hunt and stalk with these illegal operations. Good people’s lives are being destroyed over hate, greed, insecurity, and fear, while they steal tax-paying dollars and do it with even more incentive.

It’s all done under the banner of “protect and serve.” But without real accountability, the public isn’t being protected — it’s being conditioned to tolerate more and more abuse. When people look away, excuse it, or stay silent, they’re not keeping order; they’re giving permission for things to keep escalating.

And when these people—connected at the highest levels of authority—befriend Kevin and enter his life, powerful entities with seemingly unlimited resources take part in hunting and stalking him. for no real reason. Illegal trials and judicial operations are held to make sure Kevin can’t prove innocence in courtrooms, no matter how much direct proof exists—with paid-off judges, or judges who all want these crimes covered up—ensuring that what was started when Kevin was five years old by the judicial system, police, and government never gets out in the open and to the people.

Police refusal to stop crimes against Kevin, or to help him if they don’t like him, and even Internal Affairs, means it doesn’t matter how much video footage, photos, or proof is provided. A girl tries to slice Kevin up with a knife, a person with a police-trained K9 shreds his leg all on video, they write Penal Code 187 on his car, a girl named Victoria Walker and criminal defense attorney Michael Bialys are sent after him with his Visual FX supervisor Brian Longbotham, while Brian was suing Modern Video Film for breach of contract. These people would befriend Kevin, but once they entered his life, extremely large entities with unlimited money would take part in hunting and stalking him for no legitimate reason.

It included corporations such as Universal Studios, property owner Rick Caruso, Brian Longbotham (heavily involved in these stalkings), the City of Thousand Oaks Civic Center, and many other large corporations in frame-job operations with the LAPD and Government with Worldwide support. This all demonstrated that when these people enter Kevin’s life, extremely powerful entities mobilized to hunt and stalk him for no reasonable cause.

The police broadcast defamatory information using their global systems to defame and discredit Kevin across the United States. For example, the LAPD has been blasting on their police computer system that Kevin Perelman is a public nuisance—PROVEN!—and they have spread countless other defamatory statements to cover up their crime spree against him, so when he reports a crime against himself anywhere, the authorities refuse to protect or serve. This is an escalating template since he was five years old, however he found out in 2001, when he was 29. Already doomed the minute of finding out.

Each local police department, no matter where Kevin is, works with these citizen stalking groups to hunt and kill or eradicate him anywhere in the United States. Their only real message is that they don’t care about his life, and nobody wants to know about the truth—even while they run a worldwide, daily, minute-by-minute obsessed stalking operation to eradicate him at all costs—based on thousands of defamatory fabrications and daily gaslighting tactics. In reality, they are obsessed with him and can’t let go while creating newer and newer delusional beliefs about him, while publicly claiming not to care. Obviously, they do care and are angry about something—having hunted and stalked him since he was five years old, refusing to stop until he is dead or gone for no reason other than the secret they started in 1977. They pretend what they are doing is just teasing or a game—methods to kill and get away with it, without an investigation. Deliberately designed to kill a five-year-old in these ways, by the U.S. government and psychology community.

Since no one worldwide is coming forward with honesty, it proves that what they are doing is to hunt and kill or eradicate, in an unheard-of coordinated method. The only real question left is: What were people across the United States and world told, What were they told to do directed at Kevin Perelman or if they saw him? and how did the United States government do this—uniting the majority of a planet led by depraved people in the name of control, fear, or insecurity, or supporters, to hunt and kill for them out of hate? This is something that will be analyzed for centuries to come, based on social dynamics, once the truth is out. This is what fuels the police, psychology community, security companies, and the worldwide terror and stalking network of vigilantes in this sick cause to kill or eradicate a five-year-old Jewish person, based on random statements like, “He scares me,” even when they have never even met him. These are empty, racist, bigoted judgments from day one—especially within the judicial system and government—directed at a five-year-old.

All these acts—illegal monitoring of children, police profiling and labeling, privacy violations, illegal hacking, government assassination operations, judicial cover-ups, and global stalking—demonstrate a world where a person can be stripped of all rights, dignity, and safety simply for being different, or in this case, lack of some eyebrows based on DSM-5 book of psychological labeling in it’s worst case scenario, or for daring to ask why. Every institution that should have protected Kevin chose instead to join in or turn away. Every “solution” only buried the truth further.

Conclusion:
Kevin Perelman’s life is a stark warning of how unchecked power, organized hate, and systemic dishonesty can destroy an innocent person from childhood onward. When governments, law enforcement, judicial systems, and entire communities turn their machinery of stigma, surveillance, and elimination on a single target—while pretending it is for the public’s good—everyone’s freedoms are in peril. The “hate cage” is not just a metaphor for Kevin’s experience, but a reality that could threaten anyone labeled inconvenient, imperfect, or simply different. Only through truth, accountability, and an unwavering defense of human dignity can such injustice ever be stopped.

If you don’t think you could be next, then you would be CRAZY to think that!

While this cannot be confirmed 100% chances are in my life, it’s not just a random Internet Port Scan that happens every day.

This s an example of the types of things that Ron Perelman is paying off LAPD, Lorena Escobar, and people to do. While this would normally seem trivial port scan and maybe a Cyber Security Company randomly scanning ports. It is directly linked to security companies stalking me, such as Monsoor’s Threats’ “Your Going to Jail” with their Paranoia and gas lighting Tactics.

There have been nonstop privacy violations since 1994 computer level. And a lot more based on social interactions where every aspect of my life is collected, mimicked, mocked, belittling, idea of reference tactics, and all across the World. Not one day goes by almost every human interaction is based on nonstop instigations and provokings to try to create the illusion of Mental Illness with the Perelman nonstop Death Threats. “It’s you behavior”, “It’s your Transgressions”, “You had better accept what’s going on or it will get a lot worse for you”

Normally you would say, it’s just a cyber security company scanning for open ports to analyze ways to protect the Internet and make it a better place. But in my life, things aren’t that simple.

In my life, it’s about mass groups trying to create the illusion of criminality, and mental illness as cover ups to what the Perelman Family Started in 1977.

Normally I’d agree, but when Lorena Escobar is working with Ron Perelman in Minute by Minute Golden State Sports Medical ATTACKS provokings for 10 years straight with Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinse of Topanga Division while Lorena Escobar is threatening my life “It’s what you are doing in the Privacy of your own home”, and Ron Perelman “You know what you did”

With Michael Patrick Huntley “It’s your behavior” this is no longer me being too sensitive. While noticing a pattern of pure HATE, RAGE, and STALKING directed at me.

This backed by LAPD, Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinse’s obsession with making anyone they think has any type of mental illness disappear from society due to hate and fear of the unknown.

Lorena Escobar is Ron Perelman’s office manager at Golden State Sports Medical, his Workers’ Compensation medical business. The statement and admission of guilt, “It’s what you’re doing in the privacy of your own home,” is central to why Ron Perelman paid off Mike Huntley—along with the rest of my family—to lure me back from the University of Colorado. Their goal was to get me close to them so they could stalk me, involving the LAPD and continuously inciting the masses to defame my name worldwide with their outdated, deluded ideologies about life—attitudes more fitting for the 1800s.

Lorena Escobar was paid off to stalk and target me since I was 16 years old. This manipulation culminated after the Mike Huntley death threats in 2001, including statements like, “We are using the Judicial System Against You,” “Have a good life now,” “World of Paranoia,” and “You had better live a careful life.” I was also told, “Well, you built adult websites for people, didn’t you?”—referencing Tim Thompson at our company, Signet-e Services, and my involvement with the company Mike Huntley wanted to start. These and many other threats, along with my discovery of their worldwide conspiracy to commit murder involving the United States Government and the psychology community, led Ron Perelman to manipulate me into working at his office in 2005.

Their tactics involve worldwide privacy violations and daily provocations using “ideas of reference”—subtle hints or references such as, “I know you went to this website.” Random strangers, together with computer hacking groups, have collected every detail of my life and use schizophrenia-like tactics, constantly alluding to my supposed guilt in almost every area of my life.

Buying a camera, taking photography classes, flying drones, playing pool, going to restaurants or coffee shops, taking walks or road trips, buying cars—no matter what I do, I am met with daily verbal provocations, mimicry tactics, or overt hostility that’s never directly stated. This is just like Ron Perelman, who after 40 years, still says, “You know what you did.” But when asked, he cannot actually state what this supposed transgression is, instead creating an illusion of paranoia, schizophrenia, obsession, or of me being a criminal. The intent is to execute his five-year-old child—me—across a 49-year period out of pure hate and rage.

The entire Perelman family holds psychology degrees, which reveals how their attempts to control and judge others began, stemming from self-righteous, “holier-than-thou” attitudes based on inconsequential incidents, such as hair-pulling. Their reasoning changes almost daily. For example, at age eight, in 1980, after I kissed a black girl at Sunny Skies Day Camp, they claimed I was filled with anger and rage and needed to be removed from society, even going so far as to label me anti-Semitic and racist. This information was apparently disseminated worldwide so that anyone I met afterwards would help remove me from society, poisoning the well through daily-changing defamation that spreads across the Internet.

Things escalated in 1994 at the University of Colorado, when Jason Perelman contacted me, wanting me to see “the Information Superhighway” (the Internet). He, along with his friends Mike Wexler and Jason Baum, stalked and hunted me while I was at the university. Jason had graduated from the University of Colorado before I transferred there.

Apparently, because I talked to women on IRC (Internet Relay Chat), attended IRC parties, met people, and dated while pursuing my college degrees, this upset Ron Perelman so much that he decided my very existence had to end—I had to disappear. He did not approve of online dating websites or Internet chatting. In reality, any woman I had associated with since childhood was told to cry wolf, create lies about me, and to participate in ongoing stalking and hunting, driven by hate and baseless labels.

To Ron Perelman, anything he disapproves of becomes, in his mind, a crime—even things as simple as taking a photography class at the University of Colorado with my professor Nick in the Art Department.

When he says, “You know what you did,” it could refer to something as trivial as eating at a Chinese restaurant. This demonstrates that you are dealing with a deluded, paranoid, psychotic individual who doesn’t understand right from wrong.

What followed was a worldwide conspiracy to commit murder through unconventional privacy violations and relentless attacks, including the malicious use of DSM mental illness labels as weapons designed to eradicate targets at all costs.

These methods are similar to those of the Stasi in East Germany. Ironically, this comes from a Jewish family who seems to support Gestapo-like tactics, even though such methods are used to hide who and what they really are.

What is this really about? It goes back to 1977, when the Perelman family allegedly decided their five-year-old needed to die and launched a worldwide, 49-year, minute-by-minute daily bullying operation to mentally batter me to death—while simultaneously insisting I am imagining all the ongoing attacks and abuse.

Relevant California Criminal Penal Codes:

• Penal Code 646.9 (Stalking): Repeated harassment or threats causing fear.
• Penal Code 422 (Criminal Threats): Willfully making serious threats with the intent to cause fear.
• Penal Code 187 & 664 (Murder and Attempted Murder): Conspiring or attempting to commit murder.
• Penal Code 182 (Criminal Conspiracy): Two or more people conspiring to commit any crime.
• Penal Code 236 (False Imprisonment): Restricting someone’s movement through coercion, fraud, or violence.
• Penal Code 653m (Harassing Electronic Communication): Repeated, threatening, or harassing electronic communication intended to annoy or threaten.

Potential Relevant California Criminal Penal Codes:

Penal Code 653m (Harassment via electronic communication): Repeated, unwanted electronic communication with intent to annoy/threaten.

Penal Code 646.9 (Stalking): Making repeated unwanted contact with another person causing fear for safety.

Penal Code 422 (Criminal Threats): Willfully threatening serious harm with the intent to put the victim in fear.

Penal Code 187 (Murder) & 664 (Attempted Murder): Conspiracy or attempts to commit murder are serious crimes.

Penal Code 182 (Criminal Conspiracy): Two or more persons conspiring to commit any crime.

Penal Code 368 (Elder or Dependent Adult Abuse): If there is targeted psychological abuse over time.

Penal Code 236 (False Imprisonment): Restricting someone’s freedom of movement.

While this could be a normal portscan, it probably is not. And the reason is, that LAPD with the PERELMAN family and their mass hate groups want to create the illusion of Mental Illness as a COVER UP to their 49 year crime spree against me. My life changing in 2001, met with Mike Huntley’s DEATH THREATS “World of Paranoia” and me finding out, something was very wrong. Wasn’t acceptable to them. Then realizing what they were doing with the masses to create the illusion of mental illness, starting in 1977 really upset them. Example Citiguard Security doesn’t wait outside my house in his car every night, to keep the neighborhood and Woodland Oaks Complex safe. He is paid to STALK, and Intimidate with LAPD and the masses to try to get reaction to claim I’m unstable and suffer from Mental Illness. Also Called Gas Lighting and Gang Stalking. This is done based on a Government Agenda to lock away those they don’t like or trust. The rest is manufactured as Cover Ups.