Since I was five years old, Jason Perelman and his worldwide networks have provoked me nonstop. He flicked my ear endlessly, hurled anger, manipulation, frame jobs, and kept up a steady stream of passive-aggressive, two-faced “I’m better than you” behavior. The goal was never random. The choreography was obvious: make me look hypersensitive, bait me into chasing while trying to get reactions, then flip the story so he could play the victim. If I reacted, the narrative became: Kevin is violent. Kevin is dangerous. Kevin is a paranoid schizophrenic. I didn’t realize the scale or premeditated, manipulations of it at first — I assumed Jason would grow out of it — but it later became clear these actions were part of a deliberate campaign to remove me from society.
Those provocations included staged theatrics designed to manufacture a reaction and then be reported as if I had attacked him, or was lashing out in anger and rage, spewing lies and smears into ever-wider circles. Of course, if they couldn’t get the reactions, cover up lies were made none the less to the world. As technology evolved, they used whatever tools with the police and psychology community were available to rile the masses worldwide against me. I remember specific setups from childhood and later years: while flicking me in the ear one of countless times, I was holding a steak knife; I dropped it and pretended to toss it like a dog-bone to scare him off. He ran to the family and to LAPD claiming I had tried to kill him. That stunt reinforced the family’s original lie — that a five-year-old me was “crazy” — and became supposed “evidence” that I was violent, filled with anger and rage, and unstable. My family worked with police to put me on a mental-watch list at a very young age. Jason and his friends were told to exploit the fact that I was being monitored, knowing every provocation could be flipped and framed because police were watching.
Even the symbols reinforced the narrative. My father later bought a boat and named it The Flicka — a private trophy that echoed the endless ear-flicking. Jason put a license-plate frame on his car that read like a threat: “I swerve and hit people at random.” They twisted that into idea-of-reference and schizophrenia tactics, telling people worldwide it was my car and that I was the danger. It was a public billboard and a message: this is why we’re punishing you. Around that time the “runs” began.
When I was 14 I bought a weight bench, started lifting and jogging, and they hijacked that normal teen activity into another pretext. Their weekend “runs” became routine: a few cars on CB radios, reckless driving, instigating strangers, throwing things at other cars, and spraying water from an old fire extinguisher at drive-thru employees — all designed to provoke chases. Their aim in those runs was explicit: get other drivers to chase them, then go ballistic so they could play the victim while information was disseminated worldwide claiming these activities were mine. The runs were choreographed to create one of many endless falsifications about my name and reputation to rile the masses against me — to use ordinary people as vigilantes for the police, government, and psychology community. All the while I was told to give coerced confessions about my past and that I “couldn’t see myself.” As Mike Huntley put it, “It’s your behavior” — a line that implied not only that I was supposedly committing these staged acts, but that I was somehow guilty of thousands of other fictitious crimes, or other peoples crimes, and of doing horrible things to women because of their lies about my anger and rage. They turned everything around and pinned it on me.
One of their signature props was the “sexy BMW.” It wasn’t just a car — it was a coded smear, driven by one of their Persian or Armenian friends. On the surface it fed the spectacle; underneath, it served as schizophrenia-style messaging: this is what Kevin does to women; this is who he really is. While I was 16 and modifying cars and hanging out at Kevin’s Burgers. A car meet location, my friends manipulated me to go to. Once again, using the Name “Kevin’s Burgers” as an Idea of Reference Message. My so-called friends fed m messages, hinting that I made women “explode” in anger. Jason and his friends staged rituals — cooking hamburgers doused with tons of alcohol to try to get them to explode — then engineering fictional theories of my supposed behaviors. Implying hamburgers are women. Jason switched roles seamlessly — instigator and tough guy, one moment, crying victim the next — claiming I tried to kill him when he was in the passenger seat on a canyon drive. The duality wasn’t inconsistent; it was tactical.
They weaponized the car/woman analogy. The “sexy BMW” and the license plate “SexyBMW” were shorthand: cars = women. Because they couldn’t or wouldn’t separate the two, they projected that image onto me. The choreography said: watch him look at that car; he sees women like that; he treats women like objects and abuses them. Then they treated ordinary interactions as if I viewed women the same way they objectified cars, using that false equivalence to sell the narrative that I was predatory. It’s an absurd projection, but it worked: once the symbol was seeded, every casual compliment or glance could be recast as proof of a manufactured personality by my family, the psychology community, and the police.
This tactic nearly turned lethal. I jumped in to stop Jason from attacking my friend Greg Waugh as he rushed at Greg with a crowbar. I put myself between them to stop the blow. Instead of acknowledging that intervention, Jason doubled down: he lectured that “blood is thicker than water” and demanded I support his assault and spying on Greg for him because Jason’s girlfriend Jennifer Yang was cheating on Jason While he was off at college. That situation reinforces the real motive of Jason’s behaviors of the runs and the larger choreography — it wasn’t just mischief; it was a system of staged aggression covered by family loyalty and institutional protection.
They leveled other threats, too — boastful lines like “Me and my friends put a teacher in a mental institution,” and “we have a bug in your room, and are listening to everything you do on the radio” Those messages connect to other local actors (LAPD Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinse’s illegal arrests against me. Using his Facebook account to rile the masses against me with his cover up lies, and related Facebook posts about forcing people into mental institutions with Court Reporter Debbie Wollman from Van Nuys Court House purchasing the townhouse adjoining my wall, and no one ever living in it) and reinforce the climate of psychological warfare to make people look crazy, and intimidation. All of these threats functioned as warnings: we can break you, we can confine you, we can make you disappear into a narrative that looks like pathology.
That punishment bled into everyday life. If I say something as simple as “you’re sexy” to a woman, the interaction is folded into the same choreography. She’ll be primed to overreact, the moment is amplified and tied back to Jason’s “sexy BMW” runs, and overnight it becomes “evidence” that I harass women and am dangerous. A harmless compliment becomes criminalized. And if I point out what they are doing, they immediately shift into obsessional cover-ups and intensified denials with mental illness label cover-ups.
This is the paradox at work. Every road, every interaction, every word is pre-scripted to be turned against me. If I react, I’m violent. If I don’t, they still frame the scene. If I stay silent, I’m guilty of silence. If I speak, it’s proof I’m schizophrenic. Even compliments are twisted into evidence. That engineered no-win system — run for decades by Jason Perelman and his friends and reinforced by family lies and police monitoring — is how they eradicate a person.
And the final twist is escalation. The more I try to get to the bottom of what’s happening — the more I ask, “What the fuck is going on?” — the worse it gets. Asking the question produces larger groups of actors, louder spectacles, death threats, provocations, mind games, more aggressive setups, wider smear campaigns, more illegal arrests, and faster retaliation. In my case, this pattern produced three illegal arrests designed to incarcerate me for life— not for crimes I committed, but for daring to ask questions, file police reports, speak out, tell the world they have been lied to, and defend myself. Seeking truth became the clearest trigger for the operation; the act of asking the question was treated as the ultimate crime.
Finally, these local tactics scaled up. The same people and methods Jason and his friends used locally became the seeds for exponentially growing worldwide groups that now attack me minute-by-minute. Those networks weren’t spontaneous; they are directly linked to the same operations designed to set me up, provoke me, and then hand my reactions to police and institutions as “proof.” The worldwide groups amplified the choreography — every staged run, every ear flick, every road-rage stunt became another node in a growing global campaign of provocation and framing. In short: local setups became global hunting parties, fed into police and judicial channels to try to lock me away. By 1994, when they realized they could weaponize the Internet, the harassment multiplied by orders of magnitude.
How Systemic Abuse Thrives—Every Actor, Every Level
Context Erasure: How the Judicial System Turns the Plural Into the Singular
Defense Attorneys: Oath, Duty, and Systemic Betrayal
Corruption in the Courts—Construction of Impunity
Mental Illness Labels: The Ultimate Smokescreen
Legal Gray Area—Group Stalking C Judicial Escapism
Historical and Modern Case Studies
Why All This Defies the Judiciary’s Reason for Being
Conclusion
Appendix—Specific Examples, Penal Codes, and Legal Accountability
Introduction
There was a time when the American courtroom was seen as our system’s last bastion of hope—a place the preyed-upon could turn in extremity, protected by the neutrality of law and the human decency of judges and clerks. Self-defense was supposed to mean more than reacting to crimes against you; it was the promise that if you were attacked, cornered, or tormented, put in a situation that no one was going to help you, especially the police.
And your life was in danger; the law would shield you from further harm.
But today, the concept of “danger” has mutated. In the modern United States—especially in cases of coordinated, mass harassment—danger is not a single moment of threat but an ongoing state: the result of deliberate, orchestrated psychological, social, and legal campaigns. These are not carried out in darkness but in daylight, often with the open approval of officials—like Chief Michael Moore of the LAPD and Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinsey—who actively indoctrinate and unleash mass stalking mobs and civilian armies against people such as myself. (CA Penal Code § 182: Criminal conspiracy) These officials are not just tolerating, but actively orchestrating vigilante groups and mass civilian armies, turning ordinary community members, neighborhood watch networks, and private security into invisible proxies for the police and judicial system. (CA Penal Code § 182: Conspiracy; 18 U.S.C. § 241: Conspiracy against rights) This results in a sprawling network that terrorizes, harasses, intimidates, and isolates targets under a cloak of
pseudo-legality with clear and obvious intent to hunt, kill, or eradicate at all costs, with the full complicity of security firms and the tacit (or explicit) consent of the very judiciary meant to stop such abuse.
1. The Original Purpose of Judicial Power
The judiciary was established as a bulwark—a check against mob violence, political vendetta, and abuse of power. Its entire reason for being is to ensure that *every person*, not just the powerful, receives the protections of due process and the substance of justice. When the courts become tools of conspiracy, vengeance, or institutionalized apathy, they invert their whole purpose; the walls built to shelter the weak instead of keeping them trapped.
> The judiciary is not for officials’ convenience or as a shield for the strong. Its sole mission is justice, proportionality, and the defense of the individual against every abuse—including those perpetrated by the state and its “private” partners.
2. How Systemic Abuse Thrives—Every Actor, Every Level The Futility s Weaponization of Restraining Orders
For victims of group, organized, or “gang” stalking, the “remedy” most offered is the
restraining order:
Designed for single antagonists, not organized mobs or complex networks. (CA Code of Civil Procedure § 527.6: Applies to individuals)
Judicial clerks accept stacks of paperwork mainly to create the illusion of a process, knowing it will never adequately shield the target.
Even if granted, orders only ever block one at a time; participants simply rotate or evade naming.
Victims may try to file hundreds of restraining orders per year, but the system is neither equipped nor willing to protect. Legal employees urge “try again,” even when they’ve witnessed the campaign’s scale. (Judicial inaction—CA Penal Code § G6:
Judicial officer’s dereliction of duty)
Specific Scenarios: Targeted Threats by Perpetrators
Mike Huntley (Our company the Mike manipulated me to start with him, Signet E Services)
2001 – Mike Huntley manipulating me to sign up at the gym by my house with him, as Gym Manager Rodie Morales working in coordination with LAPD and Dr. Ron Perelman. As setup and frame job attempts to lock away
They attempted to manipulate me into taking a trash bag of LAPD-confiscated marijuana to get it into my house. While taking me to strip clubs all across Los Angeles. In setup and frame job operations. (CA Penal Code § 182: Conspiracy; § 653f: Solicitation to commit a crime)
(This was an illegal police operation to set up and frame me, clearly motivated by criminal intent under the pretense that I supposedly did something in the past. It involved bypassing all law, order, and proper procedure meant to protect the innocent—giving power to those with their own ideologies about life to act as executioners.)
· “World of Paranoia”
(Repeated “singing”/references, meant to create a hostile workpsychological environment, intended to and frame methe target as delusional and defame my— while letting the target know they’ve defamed his name worldwide. (CA Penal Code
§ 422: Criminal threat/harassment)
“It’s your behavior”
(Victim-blaming, (Blaming the victim, setting up the narrative of justification for the ongoing campaign)
· “We are using the judicial system against you.”
(Direct threat—weaponizingannouncing the intent to weaponize courts/ and law enforcement as tools of persecution,. Notably, this was said as while I noticed enraged worldwide stalking groups using lashing out at me with mental illness terror tactics. (CA Penal Code § G6: Abuse of judicial process; § 422: Threats).
· “Have a good life now.
(Implicit exclusion, (A dismissal with implied malice—signaling exclusion or exile from normal social exile. (CA Penal Code § 422) and professional life. A jail sentence, outside of jail.)
· “You had better live a careful life.”
(Blatant threat, intimidation to ensure—demanding hypervigilance, warning of through intimidation, with the consequence of increased daily attacks anytime ideology not approved. CA Penal Code § 422: Threats to personal safety)any time anyone doesn’t approve of anything on any level based on their own ideologies.)
· “I’ve given you enough rope to hang yourself with.”
(Language of provocation and set-up; provoke; intending entrapment, destruction.
CA Penal Code § 182: Criminal conspiracy)
“You are too out of control for California.”
(Labeling/, shaming for, and promoting social exclusion on a federal exclusion
level.)
· Crocodile Dundee movie quotes:
“Nah Back there, if you got a problem, you tell Wally. And he tells everyone in town.
Brings it out in the open. No more problem.” (Encourages group “An explicit
reference to mobilizing an entire community or “town” to quietly “do away with” a problem-solving” by—here, a metaphor for coordinated ostracism, defamation, libel, and, in effect, a conspiracy to “remove someone. CA Penal Code § 653.22: Loitering/conspiracy)” the person.) However combined with “World of paranoia”, showing remove them from the world.
· Physically placing psychological warfare materials on my desk:
(“How to make people in South Korea mentally ill and control or kill them.”) (Intimidation,(A true act of intimidation, showing direct engagement in the planning/encouragement of and psychological assaulttactics of international harassment, control, and eradication. CA Penal Code § 422: Threats; § 653f: Solicitation) campaigns.)
Garrett (Starbucks Employee, Topanga s Ventura)
“It’syourtransgressions.”
(Basically stating, “You got away with a crime—we’re hunting you.” CA Penal Code § 646.G: Stalking; § 422: Threats)
Family and Law Enforcement
Dr. Ronald Barry Perelman:
“You know what you did.”
And when questioned, “People aren’t told what they did because they can lie.” (Executioner behavior, pure hate/rage for nonconformity, bypassing all legal process. CA Penal Code § 422: Threats; § 31: Aiding and abetting)(The act of your executioner, out of pure hate and rage for not being like them. With no actual reasoning. Bypassing the entire judicial system.)
· Anita Perelman:
“Your past caught up with you.” And of course, when questioned, “I never said that.”
(Gaslighting, contributing to ongoing harm.)
· Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinsey (LAPD):
Using Facebook as a rallying point, posting to his vigilante cults on FACEBOOK about: “How do we force people into mental facilities?” (Intolerance of imperfection/difference; Conspiracy to violate rights—CA Penal Code § 182; 18
U.S.C. § 242: Deprivation of rights; CA Penal Code § 236: False imprisonment) or anything different than him.) Especially to me.
3. Context Erasure: How the Judicial System Turns the Plural into the Singular
A defining trait of illegal judicial operations in mass harassment and gang stalking is the systemic erasure of context. By design or intent, courts, prosecutors, and law enforcement steadfastly refuse to look at the “big picture.” Every complaint, act, and incident—no matter how obviously part of a larger pattern—is isolated, stripped of its true context, and treated as if it occurred in a vacuum.
How It Works:
Reducing Plural to Singular:
When someone is mobbed and stalked by hundreds or thousands over months or years— even. Even per day—, the system deliberately breaks it into isolated “events.”
“Where’s the proof it was the same person?” or “This is just one incident, not a pattern”
becomes the refrain.
· Case Example:
Multiple property destruction events, physical attacks, endless death threats, and daily provocations and harassment from the masses—all occurring over years—are
treated by the system as unrelated incidents. In reality, the entire scenario is a single, ongoing crime, with everyone involved aiding and abetting the larger operation. (CA Penal Code § 182: Criminal conspiracy; § 422: Threats) If the target ever responds—or even acts in self-defense—the system focuses solely on that response, completely ignoring the lifelong, coordinated context of provocation and abuse that led up to it.
Because it is inevitable that there will eventually be a response—if someone is worked on their entire life, day after day—any reaction should clearly be recognized as self-defense, simply because it is unavoidable under those conditions. (CA Penal Code § 6G3-6G4: Self-defense) This is exactly why it is the police’s job to protect and serve: to prevent such abuse from ever reaching this point, and to do their due diligence to expose it publicly if it has reached this level—normalizing awareness and taking action to stop it.
Courtroom Mechanics:
Judges bar evidence about broader harassment as “irrelevant” or “prejudicial,” and
attorneys are discouraged from presenting full background.
Defense is Neutralized:
Targets are told, “we can only address this one incident.” All pattern and conspiracy—the real crime—vanishes from record and argument.
Why They Do It:
· Ease of Dismissal:
Singular events are easily dismissed as minor or “paranoia.”
· Shielding the System:
Admitting the context would force the system to recognize and address its own failure or complicity.
· Legal Loophole:
Statutes punish individual, not group, organized acts; context-erasure is thus both strategy and shield.
Impact:
> This context erasure is not an accident or inefficiency—it is the very mechanism of
judicial corruption. Plural becomes singular; lived terror becomes “minor disputes;” and
real, organized crime is scrubbed from the record.
4. Defense Attorneys: Oath, Duty, and Systemic Betrayal
Many public defenders and private defense attorneys—especially in cases involving systemic abuse, group stalking, or coordinated community targeting—fail at their most basic professional duties and violate their oath to the Bar:
Oath to the Bar s Core Duty:
Defense attorneys are sworn officers of the court. Upon admission (CA Bus. C Prof. Code § 6068; ABA Model Rules 1.1, 1.3, 3.1, 8.4), they solemnly swear to uphold the law and the Constitution, to provide competent and diligent representation, and never to aid in, turn a blind eye to, or tolerate fraud or conspiracy. Their obligation is not only to their client, but to the integrity of the justice system itself.
Upholding Law and Challenging Injustice:
Their duty is not simply to process cases, but to actively challenge prosecutions where due process, fair trial rights, or constitutional protections have been compromised—especially when confronted with mass harassment, judicial/prosecutorial conspiracy, or coordinated witness intimidation (CA Bus. s Prof. Code § 6068; Rule 1.1; 18 USC § 242; 6th Amendment).
Duty topeach and Present Context:
Competent representation requires that defense attorneys impeach prosecution witnesses when there is clear evidence of dishonesty, perjury, group collusion, or provocation (CA Penal Code § 132 – offering false evidence; § 127 – suborning perjury; CA Evidence Code § 780 – impeachment; CA Penal Code § 118 – perjury for knowingly allowing false testimony). Especially in cases of group harassment, they must expose broader patterns and systemic abuse—not isolate events as the prosecution prefers.
Obligation to Move for Dismissal in Cases of Conspiracy or Unfair Trial:
Ethical defense means aggressively pursuing dismissal when:
There is evidence of governmental or private conspiracy against the accused (CA Penal Code § 182 – conspiracy; CA Penal Code § 1385 – dismissal in the interest of justice; 18 USC § 241 – conspiracy against rights).
The defendant faces an unfair trial due to judicial bias, prosecutorial collusion, group intimidation, or overwhelming systemic harassment (14th Amendment Due Process; CA Penal Code § GG5 – set aside indictment; Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668).
Failure Constitutes Betrayal and Complicity:
Far too often, defense attorneys frame the defendant as simply trying to “get away with something on a technicality,” rather than their innocence and exposing the organized
abuse. Many accept the prosecution’s narrative without question, passing judgment ahead of the facts—motivated by judicial peer pressure, professional or political alliances, career advancement, or the powerful social club mentality prevailing in the courthouse culture (CA Rules of Professional Conduct, Rule 1.1 – competence; Rule 1.3 – diligence; CA Rule 8.4 – misconduct; 6th Amendment – right to effective counsel).
Their refusal to argue for context, contest procedure, challenge evidence, or impeach hostile witnesses is not mere negligence—it is a willful and systemic avoidance of their responsibility. In effect, these attorneys “throw their client under the bus,” trading individual rights and ethical duty for social acceptance, professional convenience, or because they fear the repercussions of opposing entrenched judicial and prosecutorial
networks (CA Penal Code § 182 – conspiracy; 18 USC § 242 – deprivation of rights under color of law).
**Bar and Judicial Oversight
Attorneys who aid in or ignore such miscarriages of justice risk discipline, ineffective assistance claims (People v. Pope, 23 Cal. 3d 412), and even disbarment. Judges, likewise, have a legal and ethical obligation to recognize ineffective counsel and grant motions for dismissal where there is an impossibility of a fair trial or evidence of systemic conspiracy (CA Penal Code § 1385 – interests of justice; 18 USC § 242).
Summary of Applicable Law and Ethics:
CA Bus. C Prof. Code § 6068 (attorney oath and duty)
ABA Model Rules (1.1, 1.3, 3.1, 8.4) (competent, diligent, honest practice)
CA Rules of Professional Conduct 1.1, 1.3, 8.4
CA Penal Code §§ 132, 127, 118, 182, 1385, 995
CA Evidence Code § 780
18 USC §§ 241, 242 (federal civil rights)
6th C 14th Amendments, U.S. Constitution
5. Corruption in the Courts—Construction of Impunity
Corruption is not just cash bribes. It is:
Suppression of context (CA Penal Code § G6: Judicial officer’s failure of duty);
Prosecutorial indifference (CA Penal Code § G6; § 182: Conspiracy);
Defense passivity (ineffective counsel, ABA violation);
Judges refuse to look beyond isolated “incidents;” prosecutors ignore mass harassment as “not fitting the code;” and defense attorneys refuse to impeach the witnesses, knowing systems are stacked. Evidence is “lost”—intentional or by neglect.
6. Mental Illness Labels: The Ultimate Smokescreen Mental Illness Labels: The Ultimate Smokescreen
Police, courts, and hired “experts” call the victim “delusional” when the evidence is strongest (CA Penal Code § 148.5: False report of a crime; § 132: Malicious prosecution).
Psychiatric labeling becomes a coordinated tool for further social erasure (CA Penal Code § 236: False imprisonment; 18 U.S.C. § 242: Deprivation of rights).
When victims persist, the system invokes mental illness.
Police, courts, and hired “experts” call the victim “delusional” when the evidence is
strongest.
Psychiatric labeling becomes a coordinated tool for further social erasure.
7. Legal Gray Area—Group Stalking s Judicial Escapism
No law addresses gang/group stalking.
· A Penal Code § 646.G: Only individual stalking applies
CA Penal Code § 182 applies to conspiracy but only with direct proof.
By slicing group conduct into one-off acts, the system hides behind the legal gray area— allowing mass harassment to continue while keeping “clean hands.” Even when direct proof of coordinated group abuse can be obtained, officials often claim it is “too much
information to deal with,” using the volume and complexity as an excuse to avoid investigation, refuse accountability, and perpetuate the abuse (CA Penal Code § G6; 18 U.S.C. § 242: Neglect/deprivation of rights).
8. Historical and Modern Case Studies
COINTELPRO
FBI’s program infiltrated and destroyed civil rights/antiwar groups by “gray area” law,
unchecked by courts for decades (18 U.S.C. § 242: Deprivation of rights). Case Study: Rex Schellenberger v. City of Los Angeles
Another Charles Sean Dinse Victim, Such as myself. Three illegal arrests, and he’s working on more until I’m incarcerated for life or dead. No matter what it takes with his WORLDWIDE Judicial Extermination operations (CA Penal Code § 236: False imprisonment; 18 U.S.C. § 242: Civil rights violation).
A landmark federal case underscoring the deep collusion among police, the City of Los Angeles, and community groups in the use of digital and traditional harassment tactics:
Confiscation/Destruction of Property: (CA Penal Code § 484/§ 487: Theft)
Removal of Encampments: (Fourth/Fourteenth Amendments, § 1G83: Civil rights)
Weaponized Social Media, Community Watch: (42 U.S.C. § 1G83, § 241/§ 242: Civil rights conspiracy)
M.K. Background:
Rex Schellenberger, a homeless Los Angeles resident, was systematically targeted by the LAPD and city officials through both traditional means and LAPD-run Facebook groups. These digital platforms were used to encourage mass community reporting, public shaming, and harassment against him and others experiencing homelessness.
· Tactics and Conduct:
Confiscation and Destruction of Property: LAPD and city work crews repeatedly
confiscated and destroyed Schellenberger’s personal belongings without warning or due process. – Removal of Encampments: His living spaces were repeatedly cleared and dismantled, often without any meaningful opportunity to contest or retrieve his property. – Weaponized Social Media: Police-led Facebook pages and “community policing” groups publicly identified Schellenberger, encouraged residents to report, shame, and pressure him, and created an ongoing atmosphere of hostility and intimidation. – Enabling of
Community Watch: LAPD and city officials openly collaborated with “community watch” groups to surveil, file complaints, and escalate enforcement actions, often amplifying harassment by thousands rather than isolated individuals.
· Legal Challenges:
Fourth, Fifth, and Fourteenth Amendment Violations: Alleged unlawful search, seizure, and destruction of property; denial of due process and equal protection. – First Amendment Violations: Censorship, intimidation, and retaliation for protected speech. – Civil Rights Claims (42 U.S.C. § 1G83): Abuse of power and deprivation of constitutional rights by state actors in concert with private citizens. – Chilling of Free Speech: Police and city agents’ use of public digital forums created an environment where Schellenberger and others felt persecuted and unable to exercise basic constitutional rights.
· Outcomes and Impact:
National Media Coverage: The lawsuit brought national attention to the growing phenomenon of law enforcement leveraging social media and “community policing” to incite digital mobbing and real-world harm against targets. – Policy Reform Pressure: The litigation and related advocacy contributed to local and national calls for oversight over police use of digital harassment tools and greater protection for homeless communities against collective punishment. – Legal Precedent: This case established the real-world harms created when official actors enable, organize, and incite mass harassment via both traditional police power and new digital networks.
In this pivotal Southern California federal lawsuit, the plaintiff, “M.K.” (pseudonym/initials to maintain privacy in court documents), exposed longstanding, city-sanctioned harassment campaigns:
Personal Encounter—San Diego Police Department:
I personally brought video and photographic evidence of coordinated attacks— proof from both San Diego and Los Angeles—directly to file a police report in San Diego. When I presented this evidence, Officer Niger responded with extreme hostility. He stated: “People are allowed to kill people if not physically touched.” When I attempted to reason with Officer Niger, he escalated his aggression,
threatening my life and declaring he would “drag me out of there, himself.” (CA Penal Code § G6: Neglect of Duty; § 422: Threats; 18 U.S.C. § 242: Civil rights violation)
Significant damages to plaintiff for § 1983 violations; official review ordered of there himself.” This exchange revealed that, far from protecting and serving, the San Diego Police Department supports the stalking and killing of U.S. citizens out of pure hatred. Their responses show they are driven by larger agendas and open knowledge of my case. Officer Niger knew of me the moment I entered—evidence that I am the target of a worldwide federal crime to execute and eradicate me since five years old, not even for any real reason, but simply due to empty labels and groupthink.
· Background:
M.K., a resident of San Diego, was subjected to years of coordinated harassment and targeted group actions involving not just individuals, but city employees, law enforcement, and “neighborhood watch” participants. These included constant surveillance, repeated police “wellness checks” at odd hours, slander, property interference, and public shaming.
· How It Worked:
Testimony revealed city workers and police coordinated with local community members and private security companies to monitor, report on, and ostracize the target. This led to a pervasive environment where the victim’s day-to-day activities— including entering or leaving their home—were surveilled, commented on, and sometimes openly threatened by incorporated actors of the community and city.
· Key Findings:
The court found this was not a series of isolated disputes but a pattern—effectively, a systematic campaign enabled and at times urged by the City of San Diego and its employees.
· Outcomes:
The court awarded significant damages to the plaintiff for violation of their civil rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1G83, and ordered the City to conduct an official review of its community policing, neighborhood watch, and anti-harassment policies. The case is now cited as a model for demonstrating municipality-level civil liability for orchestrated group stalking and psychological harassment.
Targeted Justice Class Actions (Ongoing Nationwide) Alleging )
· Background:
In federal courts across the United States, *Targeted Justice* and allied plaintiffs— including private citizens, homeless advocates, and civil rights organizations—have filed large-scale class action lawsuits against various government agencies, police departments, private security firms, and corporate actors.
· Allegations:
The lawsuits allege “organized stalking,” electronic harassment, illegal surveillance, coordinated defamation, and psychological operations (targeting individuals deemed “difficult,” whistleblowers, or simply in the wrong place at the wrong time.
· Legal Theories:
Reliance on federal RICO—18 U.S.C. § 1G62; Civil rights—§ 1G83). Pattern statutes (Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act), which require proof of a pattern of racketeering/coordinated illegal activity. – Use of 42 U.S.C. § 1G83 to seek redress for constitutional rights violations by state actors and their private proxies. – Many suits stress “pattern and practice,,” not isolated violationsevents, dominating their pleading and evidentiary strategy.
· Significance:
These cases put “organized stalking” and systemic abuse on the radar of federal courts, creating a record for future reform and judicial recognition of group-based, rather than singular, civil rights violations.Monell v. Department of Social Services (1978, Supreme Court)
Municipalities
Key Precedent:
The U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in *Monell v. Dept. of Social Services* (436 U.S. 658) holds that municipalities and local governments can be held civilly liable for constitutional rights violations when those violations are caused by “official policy or custom” (§ 1983: Municipal liability).(not just by rogue employees).
· Legal Impact:
Allowed lawsuits that do not simply name individual bad actors, but challenge and seek reform of policies, collective practices, or systemic failures leading to mass harm.
Established new legal standards for suing cities, counties, and agency heads for enabling, ignoring, or encouraging civil rights abuses. – Lifetime significance: Frequently referenced in lawsuits on group stalking, police misconduct, and institutional failure to intervene.
Nuremberg Trials, Soviet Psychiatry, Tuskegee Syphilis Study — Historic Lessons
Nuremberg: Judges/ (1G45–1G46)
· Background:
After World War II, judges, medical doctors held criminally liable for group-based, and public officials involved with Nazi Germany’s crimes—including genocide and psychiatric persecution. —were prosecuted by an international tribunal in Nuremberg.
· Precedent:
Personal Criminal Responsibility:
“Following orders” is not a defense (Universal principle; 18 U.S.C. § 242).
. Officials who direct, excuse, or facilitate group-based persecution—whether through law, medicine, or judicial edict—are individually criminally liable, even if their actions were “legal” under their own regime.
For example, Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinse, in relation to the targeting of Rex Schellenberger: , stated:
“I was under orders by Chief Michael Moore.” (CA Penal Code § G6; 18 U.S.C. § 242)
He made this statement just before carrying out his third illegal stalking and arrest operation against me in 2023, using his mass stalking cult mobs in their ongoing setup and frame job operations which is now a 48 year operation started with the Perelman Family and Psychology community and Illegal Police Monitoring.
Soviet Psychiatry: Legal/ (1G60s–1G80s)
· Background:
The Soviet government used psychiatric diagnosis as a means of silencing dissidents and political opponents. Courts and public hospitals, at the behest of the KGB and party leaders, would institutionalize the “unfit,” label them insane, and forcibly medicate them.
· Precedent:
Demonstrates how the legal and mental health systems used to institutionalize dissenters (CA Penal Code § 236; 18 U.S.C. § 242).
, in alliance, can become instruments of political and social extermination through “legalized” abuse—*precisely because context and pattern were always ignored or hidden.*
Tuskegee: Systemic abuse and judicial Syphilis Study (1G32–1G72, USA)
· Background:
For forty years, public health officials and doctors deliberately withheld treatment from African-American men suffering from syphilis to study disease progression. The study’s existence was denied and minimized for decades; judicial systems ignored complaints and protected bureaucratic actors.
· Precedent:
Embodies the consequences of administrative inertia and institutional cover-up (CA Penal Code § G6).—where “systems” ignore individual and collective suffering until external outrage forces reckoning.
Each of these cases and precedents—legal and historical—directly inform the analysis of modern mass harassment, context erasure, and judicial complicity. They
serve as warnings and roadmaps for legal responses to collective, orchestrated, and system-excused abuse.
G. Why All This Defies the Judiciary’s Reason for Being
Justice is supposed to protect the few from the many, the powerless from the powerful. When the legal system’s central tool is to erase context—to reduce plural to singular—it becomes a machine for abuse, not a shield.
Conclusion
This nightmare did not begin in the shadows or with strangers. It began with my own family—doctors and psychologists, deeply embedded in the medical and mental health professions, each with influence and connections shaped by their careers. I was born in 1972 on Castle Air Force Base in Merced, California. My father was a doctor on that airbase, which connected him to the highest levels of both military and medical power. From the very beginning, those with authority and insider knowledge had a direct role—and a direct line—to the systems that would one day be weaponized to destroy me.
What’s unfolding now is not merely a series of local betrayals, but a total reversal of the American promise. The Constitution of the United States was written as the only true safeguard for the people—meant to protect against the excesses, abuses, and crimes of unchecked government, and against the tyranny of the majority or the powerful. Its existence is both a literal and symbolic shield for those who are vulnerable, targeted, or “different.”
But today, most people—especially those who “have it well in life”—either no longer understand or no longer care about the Constitution or the civil rights it was meant to protect. Why? Because for the fortunate and the comfortable—for the spoiled brats whose lives are untouched by this machinery—it is always someone else, someone weaker, who pays the price. Indifference and complicity thrive among those shielded by privilege; their silence is as deadly as any mob action because it leaves the system’s cruelty completely unchecked.
Let’s not forget: America’s entire foundation is the story of a people fleeing government tyranny for something better—a nation built on the principle that the law’s purpose is to keep people safe from government, not empower it to perpetrate the very crimes it was created to prevent.
The Cycle of Lies, Labeling, and Cult Guilt
Compounding all of this, the unethical family psychological labeling and lies originated by my own family have poisoned the well for generations. Because of these labels, I have never met a single human being who actually believed this was wrong or who would break from the pattern to intervene. Instead, each person I encounter—whether out of fear, brainwashing, or the need to be accepted—enables and protects what has gone on for nearly half a century. What began as rumors, false reports, or private medical and psychological labels became a global, self-protecting cult—a mass conspiracy, in effect, to erase and ultimately murder one individual, to eradicate at all costs.
This system is held together by a terrible emotional logic: everyone protects everyone else, not just to perpetuate harm, but to avoid confronting their own guilt and complicity for the original injustice, stretching back 48 years.
If anyone provoking me is asked how they know of me, the answer is always, “I don’t.” After
that, the attacks only increase—both from that person and from others.
The police monitoring wasn’t random; it began at the direction of my own family—doctors and officials—when I was around five years old on a military base. No one is willing to step forward to admit fault—because after so many decades, taking responsibility would mean facing the reality of unthinkable, unbearable guilt. This is true especially among those in the judicial system.
The crime is not just a worldwide conspiracy to commit murder, harassment or daily minute by minute provokings or harassment, but a mass abdication of ethical and moral responsibility cult-like conspiracy to protect the original lie and the harm it seeded.
A Global, Networked Terror Cell—Minimized by the System
What I am experiencing is not persecution by a few or by officials alone. It is:
Almost every single human being I interact with since I was 5 years old, globally, taking part—by commission, omission, or coercion—in coordinated acts with neighborhood watch groups and worldwide conspiracies. Endless provokings, setup attempts, and frame jobs.
This network is a globally organized terror cell, with the explicit aim of erasing a single human being—myself—since childhood.
> This is so unheard of that any attempt to explain it is dismissed, minimized, or pathologized by every layer of the system. What is a global attempt at execution is written off as “a tiny little tease.” This alone shows motive and premeditation.
This denial is proof of organized complicity: when all of society “dumbs down” the endless 48-year attacks but maintains it, the system has truly inverted its purpose—protecting not the victim, but the very mechanism of abuse and extermination itself.
This is something the government will kill to cover up—and at this point, they are actively hunting me to kill me in order to bury forever what they started decades ago. They justify it by labeling me as mentally ill, or simply as “different” or someone who “thinks differently,” to excuse and continue what they have always been doing.
11. Appendix—Specific Examples, Penal Codes, and Legal Accountability
Actor/Action
Quotes/Behavior
Penal Code(s) (with short description)
Factual Crime/Offense
Judge (and Referees)
Suppression of evidence, refusal to allow impeachment or context, dismissing harassment campaigns
CA Penal Code § G6 (judicial officer corruption or misconduct); CA Penal Code § 182 (conspiracy); 18 USC § 242 (deprivation of rights under color of law); Judicial Conduct Act
Felony judicial misconduct, deprivation of rights, conspiracy against rights
Mike Huntley (Busineess Partner, and friend sent after me when I was 14 years old)
“We are using the judicial system against you.” “Have a good life now.” “You had better live a careful
CA Penal Code § 422 (criminal threats); CA Penal Code § 182 (conspiracy); CA Penal Code § 646.G (stalking, if conduct is persistent); 18
life.” Dropping guides on “how to make people in South Korea mentally ill and control or kill them.”
USC § 241 (conspiracy against rights); 18 USC § 2261A (stalking across state/international lines, if applicable)
harassment
Garrett (Starbucks Employee with Starbuck and Coffee Shops Worldwide)
“It’s your transgressions.” “You got away with a crime—we’re hunting you.”
CA Penal Code § 646.G (stalking); CA Penal Code § 422 (criminal threats); CA Penal Code§ 653m (harassing communication, if applicable)
Stalking, criminal threats, organized harassment
Charles Sean Dinsey (LAPD)
Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinse is involved in 3 illegal arrests to incarcerate me for life to cover up their mass worldwide mobbings and eradication operations which they started when I was 5 years old from predecessor to predecessor. Involved in local community watch groups Using the Internet,
CA Penal Code § 422.6 (interference with civil rights); CA Penal Code § 182 (conspiracy); CA Penal Code § 236 (false imprisonment, if institutionalization is threatened or attempted); 18 USC § 241/242 (conspiracy/deprivation of rights)
Interference with civil rights, conspiracy, organized group harassment, false imprisonment
Actor/Action
Quotes/Behavior
Penal Code(s) (with short description)
Factual Crime/Offense
and his Facebook account as a weapon to build worldwide stalking armies to silence me about what they started when I was 5 years old
ChiefMichaelMoore (LAPD)
Implementing and condoning “community policing” policies including “forced” mental institutionalization , allowing mobbing under color of law. As well as Police Monitoring of children
CA Penal Code § 236 (false imprisonment); CA Penal Code § 182 (conspiracy); CA Penal Code § G6 (misconduct in public office); 18 USC § 241/242 (conspiracy/deprivation of rights); RICO 18 USC § 1G62 (if part of broader enterprise)
Conspiracy, deprivation of rights, abuse of authority/office , false imprisonment
Neighborhood/Communit y Groups/Security Companies Worldwide
Stalking, surveillance, intimidation, working in concert with police
RICO (18 USC § 1G62) (racketeering/institutiona l criminal enterprise); CA Penal Code § 182 (conspiracy); CA Penal Code § 422 (criminal threats); CA Penal Code§ 646.G (stalking)
“You know what you did.” “Your past caught up with you.” Persistent
CA Penal Code § 646.G (stalking); CA Penal Code § 368 (elder/dependent adult abuse, if victim in those
Psychological harassment, aiding and abetting, emotional
Actor/Action
Quotes/Behavior
Penal Code(s) (with short description)
Factual Crime/Offense
gaslighting and participation in harassment
classes); CA Penal Code§ 422 (criminal threats); CA Civil Code § 1708 (invasion of privacy by psychological harassment), if applicable
abuse, stalking
Actor/Action
Quotes/Behavior
Penal Code(s) (with short description)
Factual Crime/Offense
Defense Attorney (Public/Private)
Refusal to impeach witnesses, denial of context, passing judgment before proof, “throwing client under the bus” for peer/political pressure
CA Bus. C Prof. Code § 6068; CA Penal Code §§ 182, 132, 127, 118, 1385; CA Rules Prof. Conduct 1.1, 1.3, 8.4; 18 USC §§ 241, 242; 6th Amendment
Ineffective assistance, legal malpractice, professional misconduct, deprivation of rights, conspiracy, bar/disciplinary violations
Final Excerpt:
> The judiciary, in ignoring or enabling mass harassment and conspiracy, has abandoned its mission. The law was not born to defend the powerful, but to shield the one against the mob. Every clerk, officer, judge, or civilian colluder who knowingly “processes” organized abuse helps turn the law from salvation to scourge. True reform—true justice—means holding each accountable, by the letter and the spirit of the codes they now betray.
The Socialogical Dynamics of Communication as Psychological Warfare:
How Tactics Are Used to Discredit, Isolate, Immobilize, Silence and Eliminate
By Kevin Perlman
Introduction
Across America, a subtle yet potent form of psychological warfare is unfolding, aimed at ordinary citizens. This campaign of discrediting, immobilizing, and ultimately silencing targets is driven by invasive and manipulative tactics. In my own experience, these methods are not just about harassment — they’re about elimination and eradication at all costs.
A System of Control and Privacy Violations
These tactics are deeply rooted in privacy violations. Since childhood, I have been subjected to surveillance, manipulation, and setups and frame jobs — starting as early as five years old, when my own family began framing me as “crazy.” My brother Jason Perelman, told to provoke me while playing victim, was part of this from the beginning. By the time I was in school, neighbors, friends, and even strangers were drawn into the harassment and terror network.
Since 2001, the escalation became undeniable. At Signet-e Services, my own business, I confronted my business partner Mike Huntley about the privacy violations I was seeing. Instead of denying it, he lashed out, admitting:
“Mike, what the hell is going on”
“World of Paranoia”
“We are using the judicial system against you.”
“You are too out of control for California.”
“You had better live a careful life.”
“It’s your behavior.”
At first I thought his words were a sick joke. But the attacks never stopped. That was when I realized he was serious — and the mask had come off.
Methods of Weaponizing Speech and Privacy
This is how the cycle works:
Ideas of Reference and Guilting: Private information is used to imply “we know what you did” without directly accusing you.
Invasive Surveillance: Illegal surveillance tools — such as trojans, phone tapping, and location tracking — are used to collect data and spread it to participants.
Setting Traps for Communication: If you confront them, they deny everything or accuse you of paranoia: “We never said that.” Or pretend they are afraid of you and spew out disinformation that you are dangerous. They are a schizophrenic. They suffer from mental illness and need to get help.
Group Coordination: Attacks are repeated endlessly by groups — whistling in unison, asking the same rehearsed questions, or mirroring words back to me. And thousands of other tactics on these psychological terror levels clearly developed by the psychology community in unison with the police and government agencies.
The point is always the same: provoke, isolate, and destroy.
From Harassment to Direct Violence
Once surveillance and labeling were in place, the harassment escalated into direct physical attacks and violent setups — carried out by neighborhood watch groups, Starbucks employees, private security companies, businesses, anonymous strangers, and worldwide mass mobs. These operations were coordinated and protected by LAPD, the psychology community, the judicial system, and anyone tied into the original cover-up. Those who don’t want the truth of what was started from the beginning to ever come to light continue to protect it by force.
Examples include:
• Starbucks & Security Guard Assault Starbucks fabricated countless lies against me, then tried to force me to sign corporate falsifications. When I documented the fraudulent paperwork with photos, I was physically attacked by security guard John Paul Naranjo (Boyd’s & Associates) — seven punches to the back of the head, showing clear motive to kill. He likely was even paid by LAPD and Starbucks, since he technically worked for the shopping center, not Starbucks directly.
Their lies included claiming I was “trying to start fights” — when in reality, it was their own employees, associates, and even customers endlessly provoking me. This began on my very first visits to Starbucks in 2004 and has continued ever since, with worldwide support. The same harassment follows me in coffee shops and businesses everywhere I go — almost minute by minute.
Racist and bigoted comments like “Your kind” reveal the discriminatory motives behind these setups. These weren’t random incidents — they were clearly organized operations. LAPD has covered up these crimes by flipping the narrative, trying to claim I am “making them stalk me.”
• Garrett A Starbucks Employee (2005) – Topanga and Ventura, Woodland Hills, Ca
Working with The Police, Psychology Community, Starbucks, Coffee bean and all coffee shops, businesses, and public places WORLDWIDE in a joint eradication operation
Around 2005, during my early visits to Starbucks when I was simply trying to get fresh air and relax, an employee named Garrett looked at me and said: “It’s your transgressions.” At the same time, I was enduring 10 to 100 harassment events per hour inside and outside the store. Showing the connected events of Coffee Shop Employees working with the Police, Psychology Community, and Worldwide Vigilante Civilians to STALK a 5-year-old.
This wasn’t casual. It was a deliberate tactic — insinuating that I had committed some crime as a child. The purpose was to coerce a false confession and to trick me into believing that the coordinated conspiracy to commit murder against me was justified. In reality, it was nothing more than a cover-up of their ongoing crime spree.
• Knife Attack An attempted stabbing by a girl tied to LAPD is on video. This wasn’t random street violence. It was a staged escalation, meant to frame me as “crazy” or a “public nuisance” so LAPD could cover up what they started when I was a young child.
• Drug Dealer Personality Neighbor & K9 Attack (Protected by LAPD) One neighbor, who acted like a stereotypical “drug dealer/thug personality,” unleashed what appeared to be a trained K9 on me. On video, it looks like a Police K9 unit truck picked up the dog afterward. Even if it wasn’t an official police vehicle, the dog was trained to attack on command.
My very first interaction with this neighbor was him threatening me: “You had better accept what’s going on or it will get a lot worse.” Later, he was caught on video screaming: “You’re a snitch, you’re dead.”
These death threats were his way of telling me I had better accept LAPD’s stalking campaigns designed to have me killed or eradicated. Once again, LAPD refused to take the video or write reports — covering it up with lies, claiming it was my fault for “making” people stalk me.
This same neighbor was also found with a pile of stolen neighborhood mail. I believe this was directly tied to Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinse’s illegal operations. Dinse was running provocation campaigns through Facebook and sending mobs after people like me.
The one common sense question you might want to ask yourself is. When I drove to Topanga Division LAPD Police station and dropped off the stolen mail and reported that after the fact. WHY was LAPD so mad at me for reporting the crime and handing them the mail?
Normally people are told to report crimes. Especially if people are stealing mail to steal corona virus stimulus checks. However like usual, this enraged LAPD more. They were mad “What do you want me to do with this” Showing that they don’t want to do anything that shows I’m not the person they’ve been spewing to the World.
Another one of his victims, Rex Shellenberger, Federally sued Dinse and the City of Los Angeles for destroying his reputation nationwide as part of these Nazi-style agendas to create a so-called ‘perfect world.’
And what was Shellenberger’s “crime”? Sleeping in his car. Dinse tried to force him into a mental institution the same way he tried with me — by forging signatures, while riling up global Facebook mobs to stalk him for it.
I also received indirect death threats from Dinse himself, delivered through stalking neighbors. He made it clear that I wasn’t “allowed” to leave my house. After one setup attempt with his criminal neighborhood watch armies, I was taking a walk at a public park. A neighbor called Dinse, then approached me to provoke me verbally until Dinse arrived. When I refused to react, Dinse told me: “Go home.” Not “Can you leave the park for now” — but go home. Later, when he saw me at another public location, he sneered: “I thought I told you to go home.”
The message was clear: my house was my jail cell. I wasn’t allowed out. Dinse and his racist, bigoted mobs had turned my life into the equivalent of a concentration camp in Nazi Germany.
Dinse also tried to dictate what I was “allowed” to do with my life. If your read between the lines what is really going on, and what my family is doing to CONTROL me with them, they claim coffee creates anxiety, so I wasn’t “allowed” to drink coffee. This is supposedly for me. To keep me healthy. He implied I couldn’t pursue studio photography because he deemed it “illegal.”
He with Officer Toro, Encino Starbucks with Dr Alex Lazar, “If you ever take a picture of a person I will exercise the law in my own way” For getting into Studio Photography.
If he disagreed with anything I did, he simply built larger neighborhood watch armies to fabricate lies and mob me to death. Dozens of these stalking setups, frame jobs, and provocations have been captured on video.
Internal Affairs repeatedly covered up for Dinse, watering down my reports and reframing everything to make me look “crazy” or “hypersensitive,” while ignoring the very real stalking, attacks, and death threats.
Dinse is even on video during break-in attempts at my home, along with other setup attempts with neighborhood watch groups. In one case, members of what I call the “Dinse Klan” tried to manipulate me into harassing a homeless person in a park bathroom to set me up. I walked away, letting them know they were on video trying to set me up. The next day, Dinse came over trying to figure out how to arrest me anyway and with his police officer buddies posing as FBI agents Impersonating FBI agents. Federal Crime. Because they couldn’t manipulate me into committing crimes, LAPD and their Nazi armies only grew angrier. And with my family.
• Bailey Bernard Bailey Bernard stalked me, followed me home, and physically assaulted me — under LAPD orders. Despite clear evidence, LAPD protected him in court. Prosecutors working with Dinse perjured themselves, and judges supported it. Judicial lies claimed I “never called the police,” even though I had records proving I did and I personally went down to the station. This shows how deeply the judicial system has been corrupted to shield perpetrators while continuing the campaign against me.
• Police Threats Officers openly threatened me, saying directly: “We’re watching you, Perelman.” These weren’t rumors — the threats were caught on video. This proves law enforcement has been monitoring and stalking me since I was five years old.
• Setups in Jail When I was incarcerated multiple times — illegal arrests staged to attack my credibility and cover up their 48-year stalking campaign — the harassment didn’t stop. It escalated. Charges were falsified, reversed, or manufactured — just like the Starbucks Defamation and slander with never ending attacks. Inside jail, inmates and officers staged provocations nonstop. Everyone already knew who I was before I even arrived.
The provocations were continual and systematic, proving that the psychological warfare extended into every environment — even jail — and that the targeting was coordinated across all levels of the system to figure out how to eradicate me and make me disappear.
Conclusion
These are just a few examples of a 48-year campaign of nonstop operations — harassment escalating into direct violence — all protected under the same corrupt umbrella of law enforcement, psychology, and the judicial system. As it is designed to do until the target is either dead or gone from day one.
Methods of Weaponizing Speech, Names, and Privacy
These tactics are progressive, exponential, and obsessive with 1000’s of these types of tactics from verbal harassment, visual, audible:
Whistling in Mass – coordinated groups whistling endlessly.
Patterned Cars – sequential pairs (Example, 2 of same colors, 2 of same cars, 2 backwards or same colors as backwards, people told to do things to you in 2’s or mimics with 2 people. Maybe 2 green jeep Cherokees parked together, or other various patterned groupings and tactics).
Cars Parked But Not Driven – used as intimidation signals. With Idea Of Reference Messages. Example, if you go to the beach and do a scenic photoshoot. When you come home you might see 2 Toyota camelry’s together. Which usually grow exponentially after this point.
Mass Repetition of Greetings – Asking “How you doing?” Response “… Good, good.” And 1000’s of other tactics like this.
Verbal Mirroring – a phrase like “Alrighty Then” doing Jim Carry Jokes on Social Networks will have worldwide groups in repetition saying “Alrighty” at every business, sometimes 5 times in a couple of minutes
If you fix something a business screwed up that they were was pretending to be incompetent. Like they couldn’t change a spark plug correctly, INTENTIONALLY doing so. Business Employees worldwide will keep calling you “Boss” this will be repeated worldwide, forever. And exponentially get worse for each tactic. An idea of reference, insinuation or inuendo from random stranger who aren’t supposed to be connected to that person or location to try to create the appearance of schizophrenia.
Copycat Tactics Worldwide – instantly replicated across states, businesses, and countries. Things I say, Gestures, Things I buy like hats, shirts, Phrases, Jokes. From Stranger to stranger when they see me. A lot of times with angry eye contact.
Fabricated Conversations – Starbucks and LAPD with Worldwide Strangers, no matter where I am. Spreading as many lies, and disinformation as possible. And worldwide. This information instantly goes Worldwide as each new daily lie is created. A cover up, of a cover up, of a cover up, daily all the way down to 5 years old. There is no method of addressing the lies. And the source is masked so that you can’t defend yourself even with a dialog to state they are fabrications. It is designed to create angry mobs to kill with no resource for survival.
Traps in Reporting – speaking or staying silent both used as evidence. The situation is ideally created to be a catch 22. Your dammed if you do and dammed if you don’t. Because the MOTIVE was there from day one.
Names as Weapons – Rhoda → Rodie → Michael → Huntley → my middle name. Idea of reference name association triggers. To create the appearance of Mental Illness or Schizophrenia.
Glamorizing the Situation – Trying to make the target think that this is for him, or people are just teasing and he is too sensitive, or try to make the target look like he suffers from Delusions of grandeur or thinks differently then others so they can try to justify a conspiracy to commit murder, or brainwash the target into thinking what they are doing is acceptable, normal, his fault, or acceptable to do. Trying to get him to accept his demise.
Even every piece of artwork all the way down to 5 year old was twisted — my mother, an art therapist, and others kept claiming it was a “confession of guilt.” Strategic methods to build angry Psychology Mobs with Worldwide Enraged Psychotic, Civilian hate armies.
Once a tactic starts, it never stops. Once the lie is created, they never let go, they keep building larger and larger stalking groups.
Manipulating Civilians, Families, and Psychiatry
At first, my mother had a list of psychiatrists prepared to ambush me. Once I understood and wanted to expose it, the psychology community wanted me dead.
Dr. Nathalie Krah:“If you don’t take medication, you will destroy your life.” Said in anger, not concern.
Stalkers following you to public locations then claiming you are stalking them: In my case countless models, pornstars, and other various predators. Stalking, and playing victim.
Dr. Alex Lazar (office next to Starbucks, Encino): As I mention that Mike Huntley was stating that I was filled with Anger and Rage, Telling Dr Alex Lazar that my family is stalking me with their groups because they feel that their 5-year-old is filled with anger and rage projecting on their child, His eyes shifted in guilt looking down at the floor. He then shifted gears from being a psychiatrist to a corrupt police officer to cover it all up. I also mentioned the Persian Stalking groups with Tom Farley at Coffee Bean on Ventura and Corbin, now known as Paulinas. And the stalking groups linking to my father Persian chiropractor Piam Shiam. In Golden State Sports Medical Lashing out in anger and rage at me. He said “I’m Persian”
His gears shifted to cover it all up as he interrogated me about photography and meeting women, instead of helping solve the problem for my health. Working with LAPD Officer Toro at Encino Starbucks on havehurst and Ventura, he threatened: “If you ever take a picture of a person, I will exercise the law in my own way.”
This Starbucks location with a customer army was working on me with upwards of 1000 attacks per day with these no Relaxing for you Nigger Death threats and the Chess Club. Every Single Time there, just like every other place Worldwide since finding out. This went on at this location alone for something like 5 years and still today no matter where I go and relax.
After this, the harassment multiplied — thousands of attacks per day at Starbucks Encino and even a nationwide shift to backwards parking in coordinated patterns. Remember that these are a few example of what is 1000’s of different types of psychological warfare tactics done to me Worldwide exponentially growing since I was 5 years old.
This is also the location the stalking Chess Club followed me to. In anger and rage with the “No Relaxing for you Nigger” Death threat Worldwide Black Community groups. Because Ariana, the black model contacted me around 2004. Off Facebook wanting me to do a Photoshoot. The final green screen composite was on a Chess Board. Her then wanting to go to PF Changs and INTERROGATE ME, to try to make me look crazy. Also hinting about the Mike Tyson Composite with Chun Li at University of Colorado. And was never interested in actual artistic creations for her future. But was STALKING. With Aubrey Fisher. Who followed me to the same Starbucks in Encino with the Chess Club. And Alex Lazar. Then Chess Club then moved to the Starbucks in Topanga and Gault. Most likely working on Psychological Angles with Christina Stahlinsky telling me to read Atlas Shrugged and closer to my house in more Starbucks and Customer STALKING operations to Eradicate and Kill at all costs. Officer Toro, Encino Starbucks “If you ever take a picture of a person I will exercise it in my own way” because someone doesn’t want their child involved in photography with women. Which has nothing to do with Legality.
Beyond Psychiatry: Toward Eradication
These operations are not about help. They are about elimination — conspiracy to commit murder, coerced suicide, or permanent incarceration. For me, it has meant decades of setups, cover-ups, and threats.
A Personal Reality
Since age five, I have lived this reality — lies, disinformation, attacks, and cover-ups. Much is on video.
The tactic never changes:
Get the target to talk.
Use his words against him.
Escalate to violence or disappearance.
Even Chief Michael Moore of LAPD admitted this exists, though he tried to downplay it. Our dialogue consists of children being monitored once the parents call the police on their child. As his definition of monitoring is very different then what they are really doing with their mental illness watch lists and community stalking operations. Especially with their head thug, Lead Officer Charles Sean Dinse and his new order Nazi regime, to eradicate the inferior race. Those who are “homeless” or have “Mental Illness” there is no middle ground. To them, only the superior race is allowed to roam the earth out of cages.
Why It’s Called Gang Stalking
It is progressive (whispers → attacks).
It is exponential (tactics multiply).
It is obsessive (never-ending, like a stalking murderer).
This is not harassment. It is organized psychological warfare. And a persistent hunt to execute you or remove you from society at all costs until they get what they want.
Legal Violations and Applicable Codes
The following incidents are not just harassment — they are direct violations of state and federal law.
Starbucks / John Paul Naranjo: Assault & Battery (PC §§240–242); Conspiracy (PC §182); 18 U.S.C. §241.
Starbucks employees working with mobbings customer groups in attacks at every location worldwide whichever one I go to as well as other coffee shops, and businesses. And refusal to stop.
Starbucks-Related Crimes and Statutory Violations
A. CALIFORNIA CRIMINAL VIOLATIONS
1. Stalking, Harassment, and Mobbing
Penal Code § 646.9 — Stalking
– Pattern of employees and customers willfully, maliciously, and repeatedly harassing or following you at multiple Starbucks locations.
Penal Code § 653m — Harassing Communications
– Verbal, electronic, or written harassment occurring within (or connected to) Starbucks, including repeated, unwanted contact.
Penal Code § 422 — Criminal Threats
– Any threats made by employees or customer groups which instill fear for your safety.
– If action is part of a group, persistent, coordinated campaign.
2. Conspiracy and Group Coordination
Penal Code § 182 — Criminal Conspiracy
– Two or more Starbucks employees, customers, or third parties conspiring to harass, stalk, or intimidate you.
Penal Code § 31 — Aiding and Abetting
– Employees (or managers) who knowingly assist or facilitate mobbing/harassment.
3. Civil Rights Violations / Hate Crimes
Penal Code § 422.6 — Interference with Civil Rights (Hate Crimes)
– If actions are motivated by race, ethnicity, disability, or other protected class.
Civil Code § 51, § 51.7 — Unruh Civil Rights Act
– Protects the right to enjoy all business establishments (like Starbucks) without discrimination, violence, intimidation, or harassment by staff or other patrons.
4. Police Involvement / Abuse of Authority
Penal Code § 149 — Assault/Battery Under Color of Authority
– If police direct, encourage, or cover up mobbing/harassment inside or outside Starbucks.
Penal Code § 136.1 — Intimidation of Victims/Witnesses
– If Starbucks (or police) intimidate or retaliate against you for reporting.
Penal Code § 118.1 — False Police Reports
– If police or employees generate false reports or statements as part of these actions.
B. CALIFORNIA CIVIL VIOLATIONS
Civil Code § 1708.8 — Invasion of Privacy/Stalking
– Intrusion into your personal peace, surveillance, or repeated unwanted approach.
– Coordinated mobbing, false rumors, or psychological harm.
Unruh Civil Rights Act (Civ. Code § 51, § 51.7)
– Specific to public accommodation—failure by Starbucks to stop coordinated harassment or violence is a civil rights violation.
C. FEDERAL CRIMES AND CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
18 USC § 241 — Conspiracy Against Rights
– Starbucks employees or management, in coordination with others (especially if police-involved), conspiring to threaten or intimidate you and prevent your full enjoyment of public accommodations.
18 USC § 242 — Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law
– If police (directly or indirectly) order or encourage Starbucks personnel to engage in unlawful conduct.
18 USC § 245 — Interference with Federally Protected Activities
– Interference with your right to patronize (enter, remain at, or use) Starbucks as a public accommodation.
18 USC § 2261A — Interstate Stalking
Garrett (2005):
A Starbucks employee, during or just before coordinated group “gangstalking” attacks by other employees and customers, states “it’s your transgressions.”
The implication is you are being stalked and targeted (with LAPD involvement or knowledge) because you supposedly committed some “crime”—even if you have not.
Legal Analysis & Relevant Codes
1. Stalking and Harassment (PC §646.9, §653m)
Repeated harassment, surveillance, and provocation—especially in a coordinated manner across locations—fits California Penal Code §646.9 (Stalking) and §653m (Harassing Communications).
The phrase “it’s your transgressions” is an attempt to justify ongoing harassment.
2. Conspiracy (PC §182)
When multiple people (employees, customers, and potentially LAPD) have a shared plan to target, monitor, and harass you, this can rise to criminal conspiracy under California Penal Code §182.
3. Color of Authority and Civil Rights Violations
If the actions are done with LAPD’s knowledge, direction, or protection, this can implicate:
– PC §149—Assault or battery under color of authority. – 18 USC §242—Federal deprivation of rights under color of law. – 18 USC §241—Conspiracy against rights.
4. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (Civil)
Coordinated workplace and community efforts to harass, shame, or intimidate you—especially justified on “transgressions”—fit the definition of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED).
5. Defamation or False Light
Publicly asserting that you committed a crime to third parties (especially if false and part of a campaign) may be grounds for defamation (libel/slander) or “false light” invasion of privacy, creating significant civil liability.
If any part of their campaign is designed to keep you from reporting, testifying, or complaining to authorities—including police, corporate authorities, or the courts—this could constitute witness intimidation or retaliation.
Knife Attack: Assault with a Deadly Weapon (PC §245); Obstruction (PC §148); 18 U.S.C. §242.
⚖️ Summary: From family to Starbucks to LAPD, every actor is implicated not just in harassment, but in crimes defined by law. These aren’t isolated acts — they form a racketeering-style conspiracy to commit murder.
Huntley’s Admissions and Setups
One of the clearest windows into how this system works came through Mike Huntley — who wasn’t just a business partner, but someone sent after me from the start, connected through my brother Jason Perelman’s friend circle when I was 14 at the same time with a Paul Humphrey, Younger Brother of Joe Humphrey is Jason Perelman’s class at Calabasas High School, who actually worked the same security job at the same Starbucks/Shopping center location as John Paul Naranjo of Boyds and Associates Security. Who joined LAPD prior to that. And befriended me stalking me with Mike Huntley for a good 15 years. Paul Humphrey clearly linked to this Starbucks location, and the Security Companies in a Conspiracy to commit murder. Ironically, he lived on Schoenborn St, Canoga Park, CA. Where LAPD Topanga Division opened up in 2009. While trying to frame me with some women on (IRC) Internet Related Chat, and also a girl named Lisa Marie, Jenifer Hess, a Girl named Honey, and many others, from moline, Illinois. On these same Internet Frame job tactics as Mike Huntley.
By 1997, Huntley, along with Anita and Ron Perelman, manipulated me into coming back early from the University of Colorado. By 2001 at Signet-e Services, the mask came off. I had begun noticing clear privacy violations in our office: emails, phone calls, private information surfacing in conversations that no one should have known.
Some of these violations were blatant. Hot Body International website development flows that I had designed were being taken off my computer and dropped onto random AOL screen names — often similar variants of my own — to make it appear that I was responsible for something. Or to try to flip out the target and put him in a paranoid state wondering what is going on to use against him.
On top of that, ICQ chats I had with a girl named Christina Stahlinski from Arizona were being watched. A pool player “friend,” Tim Thompson, mocked me by verbally mimicking what I typed to her — proving surveillance was in play.
Thompson wasn’t just some guy. I allowed him to work in my office, but he had been sent after me by Steve McPike, another pool player friend from Colorado. Thompson lived a contradiction: he himself was tied to Hot Body International and their photographer, immersed in the adult industry. He even manipulated me directly: “We should build adult websites.”While he knew I was building websites for others.
Yet later, in anger, he turned on me: “You built adult websites.” It wasn’t morality. It was entrapment. He wanted to take what he himself was doing and weaponize it against me.
Thompson also referred me to Hustler model Traci Anna Koval. I did build www.TraciAnnaKoval.com, but I didn’t let her reel me in. She was part of setups involving spy cameras in hotel rooms to film Gene Simmons. She wanted me to play a role, but I told her I wanted nothing to do with it.
Meanwhile, trojans had been placed on my computer — allowing outsiders to watch my screen live, take screenshots, even plant files. When I started piecing it together, my computer shut down remotely mid-use — a taunt from those watching me, in unheard of Worldwide, mass groups, through the trojans. Reinforcing Mike Huntley’s Death threats “World of Paranoia”, while he was carrying his threats out with actions.
That information — private data, out-of-context fragments — was fed worldwide. Pornstars like Alexis Amore, Havana Ginger, and countless others with models and worldwide groups parroted the material, fueling worldwide gaslighting campaigns. Around that time, models like Alexis Amore, working for Hot Body International, were most likely following the same patterns—claiming I was “stalking” them. This mirrored what I saw with Tim Thompson, who kept adult DVD covers on his desk and always placed Alexis Amore’s on top, ensuring it caught my attention.
These incidents connect to a much larger network involving Brian Longbotham, Universal Studios, Modern Video Film, property owner Rick Caruso, Starbucks, and many other corporations. Brian Longbotham had been my visual FX supervisor when I landed my first animation job at Modern Video Film after college. After his firing, he sought to befriend me, claiming it was for my technical knowledge and to “make money.” In reality, he was working with organizations to expand these stalking groups, bringing in random corporations or even the City of Thousand Oaks Civic Center, proposing business ideas that doubled as setups, framing attempts, or coordinated harassment on an ever-larger scale.
This was connected directly to Huntley, Bob Sandler, Tim Thompson, and Rodie Morales and many more.
Huntley even rerouted our network switch into the office next door at Golden State Sports Medical — my father’s company, with Patti Googins employed. Later, my father offered me a “can’t miss” Ventura Blvd office deal as Shelly Humphrey’s company moved their company out. It was a trap.
The gym Huntley pushed me into was packed with models and pornstars tied to Morales, the gym manager there, all playing victim in frame jobs. Morales constantly pushed me into strip clubs all over california, mirroring what Val Morozov had done at the University of Colorado in 1995: “Let’s go to strip clubs and make money.”
Even earlier, in 1991, Eric Christianson, working with San Diego Police, pulled the same tricks — stalking, Strip Clubs, and setups while running angles with Jason Perelman.
These operations were synchronized across time and geography. For example, when Morales took me to Adult Con, the very same day Val Morozov — after years of silence — suddenly called me. A seamless coordination.
This isn’t random. It’s the continuation of a 48-year narrative campaign to frame me as unstable and dangerous — when in fact it’s their setups, synchronized and staged, that prove premeditation.
Paul Humphrey’s Role and the Layers of Setup
Paul Humphrey was a grade below me at Calabasas High. His older brother, Joe Humphrey, was in my brother Jason Perelman’s class. That’s how Paul first approached me — he acted like he wanted to be friends. For a while, I believed he was.
But the setups started even earlier. At just 8 years old, I kissed a Black girl. That single, innocent moment was twisted into a permanent label: “Kevin is filled with hate and rage. Kevin is racist and antisemitic. Jewish boys don’t kiss Black girls.”
This shows the labels were already being manufactured before the later incident with Jason Gordon. Around the same age, I was manipulated by Robbie Leff into saying something lame about Gordon at the mall. Gordon instantly snapped, going from zero to one hundred, and punched me in the stomach.
Here’s the truth: out of all the billions of scenarios since then where people have lashed out at me in anger, rage, and hate — and the things said and done to me have been a billion times worse than what I said to Jason Gordon — I have never once reacted the way Gordon did. To this day, it remains the only incident in my life where I was the instigator. One imperfection, at 8 years old.
And yet, the psychology community has twisted those childhood moments into lifelong justifications. That single imperfection — things like: kissing a Black girl, mouthing off to Gordon — has been weaponized into the worldwide narrative: “Kevin’s a bully.”
Another one of these justifications came directly from Paul. His personality drove me crazy at times, and occasionally I would vent to others about him. That was turned into a weapon too: “It’s Kevin’s behavior. It’s his personality.” Once again, a meaningless, human detail was manufactured into a permanent worldwide label.
It’s like this: if you’re 10 years old and leave a Coke can on a park bench, suddenly for the rest of your life you’re branded a “litterer.” And from that single Coke can, you now have a planetary murder operation hunting you for 50 years because you “blinked wrong.” Meanwhile, everyone else sees litter everywhere and doesn’t care. That shows it isn’t about the Coke can. It’s personal. It’s about manufacturing judgments to get what they already wanted.
At 15: “Kevin’s a bully.”
At 20, in Oregon: “Kevin’s a bully.”
At 25, in Colorado: “Kevin’s a bully.”
At 30, in Starbucks, Coffee Bean, restaurants: “Kevin’s a bully.”
At 53, strangers repeat the same lie: “Kevin’s a bully.”
When that script wears thin, it shifts: “Kevin can’t let go of when he was 8. Kevin suffers from obsession.” Thousands of shifting excuses are rotated through, even absurd ones like “people only own one car” — turning life into a fake mathematical equation, all designed to feed me disinformation, to make me think I must have done something wrong, to push me into accepting being hunted down to be killed.
But anyone who is not psychotic and insane understands that people make mistakes in life. Especially insignificant childhood things that don’t matter. Which shows that my worldwide stalkers know exactly what they are doing.
And here’s the bigger truth: they aren’t questioning me or some supposed moral failing — they already know they are involved in a crime. They have the most private details of my life, distributing them worldwide, and taking them out of context. That alone proves the conspiracy:
They know the information was obtained illegally.
They know it was handed to them as a weapon.
And they know if I ask how they got it, they can’t answer without exposing themselves.
If you press them, they don’t explain — they clam up, get angry, whistle as a death threat, and esculate the mental illness bludgeoning attacks. The argument is never really “Kevin, confess to your crimes.” The real issue is: you were given this information illegally, you know it, and you’re weaponizing it to torture me.
Think about it: in 1982, there was no internet, no pagers, no smartphones. Yet these people had access to the most private details of my life, distributing them worldwide, and throwing them back at me a billion times in “ideas of reference” form. That is not coincidence. That is organized psychological warfare.
This obsession with perfection echoes Adolf Hitler, who demanded absolute perfection and rationalized extermination from even the smallest flaw. My stalkers are doing the same thing: using imperfection as an excuse for hate, rage, insecurity, and fear — while justifying first-degree murder. And, the people telling them to do it, is the Police, Psychology Community, and Government of the United States of America. Bypassing all constitutional and civil rights. Making a person Property. Making a person a slave to be whipped, and put up on crosses to be burned. Or thrown on a train to Auschwitz to go to the showers. But no excuse can justify it. Murder is a crime, no matter what rationalization is invented.
Conspiracy to Commit Murder — Penal Codes
PC 182 – Conspiracy to Commit Murder
PC 187 – Murder
PC 664/187 – Attempted Murder
Applied here:
Conspiracy: Police, psychiatry, family, neighbors, and civilians coordinating.
Murder: Eradication through suicide, collapse, or setups.
Attempted Murder: Direct assaults, knife, K9, jail setups, threats.
Gang Stalking: Relentless psychological attacks until collapse = premeditated murder.
Conclusion
This is not history. The daily attacks are still going on. To this day, I endure hundreds to thousands of coordinated provocations every day worldwide.
Golden State Sports Medical and Starbucks became staging grounds. Threats like “No relaxing for you nigger” prove how race, hate, and family ties were weaponized.
Police use civilians as puppets to commit murder for them. Civilians are manipulated, then shielded. It is murder by proxy.
And this is how it grows: one “crazy monster” → two “homeless monsters” → four → eight → sixteen → worldwide armies. Once it becomes the norm, you can’t stop it. Everyone involved is conscious and responsible.
If the world knew the truth, it would flip instantly: “Kevin is a monster” → “Kevin is a victim of one of the largest psychological warfare and murder conspiracies in U.S. history.”
This would spark worldwide controversy and force accountability.
And it all traces back to me kissing a Black girl at Sunny Skies Day Camp, age 8.
This is rooted in Hitler’s methods — imported into U.S. operations, turning civilians into Nazis.
The only way forward is honesty. Otherwise the U.S. becomes a pseudo-nation like Germany in the 1940s — hiding behind democracy while practicing tyranny and eradication.
The choice is simple: corruption or truth. Chaos or honesty. Tyranny or freedom.
1. Jason Perelman (Brother) Situation: Manipulation from childhood, provoking, playing victim as part of early harassment.
Potential Violations:
– Civil: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED, Civil Code § 43, § 1708) – Criminal: If part of a larger conspiracy—see PC 182 below.
2. Mike Huntley (Business Partner) Situation: Admissions of privacy violations, using the judicial system for harassment, direct threats, rerouting network switch for surveillance, organizing psychological attacks.
Officer Niger of Sandiego Police Department States No Crimes Have Been Committed Against Kevin Perelman:
Police-Related Crimes and Code Violations
1. Threats and Intimidation by Officers
Incidents: LAPD officers have stated directly, “We’re watching you Perlman.” Police used threats, intimidation, and coordinated harassment (including aggression in jail, collusion with jail staff, and using civilians to provoke you).
Criminal Codes:
– PC 422 – Criminal Threats – PC 136.1 – Intimidation of Witness or Victim – PC 182 – Criminal Conspiracy – PC 149 – Assault or Battery Under Color of Authority – PC 236 – False Imprisonment (if detained illegally) – PC 236.1 – False Imprisonment by Violence or Deceit – Federal: 18 USC § 242 (Deprivation of Rights Under Color of Law)
2. Conspiracy and Coordinated Group Harassment
Incidents: Coordination with civilians, security guards, and other agencies to harass, provoke, and psychologically damage you. “Gang stalking” operations, both inside and outside jail.
Criminal Codes:
– PC 182 – Conspiracy (agreement between two or more persons to commit a crime) – PC 149 – Excessive Force or Assault by Officer – PC 136.1 – Intimidation (if targeted to prevent reporting or testimony) – PC 646.9 – Stalking (if part of a repeated harassment campaign) – PC 653m – Harassing or Threatening Communications – Federal: 18 USC § 241 (Conspiracy Against Rights)
3. Excessive Force / Assault Under Color of Authority
Incidents: Physical attacks or setups in jail, police protection of civilians who assault you (e.g., attacks by security and neighbors coordinated/protected by LAPD).
Criminal Codes:
– PC 149 – Assault/Battery by Peace Officers – PC 242 – Battery – PC 245 – Assault with a Deadly Weapon – PC 240 – Assault – Federal: 18 USC § 242
4. Cover-Ups and Evidence Tampering
Incidents: Police covering up civilian assaults, attacks, and setups (e.g., not properly investigating or intentionally destroying evidence).
Criminal Codes:
– PC 135 – Destroying or Concealing Evidence – PC 182 – Conspiracy (with others to obstruct justice) – PC 118.1 – Peace Officer Filing False Report – Federal: 18 USC § 1519 (Destruction, alteration, falsification of records)
5. Abuse of the Legal Process & Judicial System
Incidents: Using the judicial system to harass or “set up” the target.
Criminal Codes:
– PC 182 – Conspiracy (abuse of process) – PC 134 – Preparing/Offering False Evidence – PC 132 – Offering False Evidence in Court – PC 137 – Inducing False Testimony or Fraudulent Documents
6. Involvement in or Facilitation of Civil Rights Violations
Incidents: Police collaborate in psychological warfare, deprivation of rights, intimidation based on prejudice or bias (race, mental health, etc.).
Criminal Codes:
– PC 422.6 – Civil Rights Violations (hate crime enhancements) – Federal: 18 USC § 242 (Color of Law), 18 USC § 241 (Conspiracy against rights), 42 USC § 1983 (civil lawsuits for deprivation of rights by government actors)
7. Protection of Criminal Acts by Civilians
Incidents: Police shielding individuals who commit assaults, thefts, or stalking against you, and refusing to act on your complaints due to coordinated efforts.
Criminal Codes:
– PC 32 – Accessory After the Fact (assisting to avoid arrest/prosecution) – PC 182 – Conspiracy – PC 149 – Abuse of Authority
8. False Arrest / Unlawful Detention
Incidents: Any situation where you are detained, arrested, or jailed without probable cause as part of intimidation or harassment.
Criminal Codes:
– PC 236 – False Imprisonment – Federal: 42 USC § 1983 (can be used to sue for false arrest or false imprisonment by police)
9. Use of Civilians (“Murder by Proxy”)
Incidents: Police manipulating or encouraging civilians to commit threats, stalking, or potential violence so that police can avoid direct responsibility.
Criminal Codes:
– PC 182 – Conspiracy – PC 187/664-187 – Solicitation or Attempt of Murder (if intent can be proven)
Criminal: – Penal Code PC 182 (Conspiracy) – PC 646.9 (Stalking) – PC 422 (Criminal Threats) – PC 632 (Illegal recording/eavesdropping) – PC 502 (Unauthorized computer access/“hacking”) – PC 422.6 (Civil Rights Violations if hate/bias-motivated) – Civil: – IIED, invasion of privacy, Business & Professions Code § 17200 (unlawful business acts)
3. Family Members (Mother, Ron & Anita Perelman) Situation: Coordinating psychiatric ambushes, supporting false labeling as “crazy,” manipulating healthcare providers.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: Conspiracy if coordinating with others (PC 182), possible elder/child abuse statutes if manipulation was abusive. – Civil: IIED, invasion of privacy, possible defamation
4. Tim Thompson, Steve McPike, Rodie Morales, Bob Sandler, Val Morozov, other business/pool associates Situation: Surveillance, setups, feeding private info via spyware/trojans, gaslighting, introducing at-risk or illicit contacts, pushing setups in adult industry.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – PC 182 (Conspiracy) – PC 530.5 (Identity Theft, if misusing your personal data) – PC 502 (Computer crimes) – PC 632 (Eavesdropping) – PC 647(j)(3) (Secretly recording in hotel or private settings) – Civil: – Invasion of privacy, IIED, defamation
5. Traci Anna Koval, and Adult Industry Associates, and Worldwide groups involved Situation: Involved in setups, surveillance, and worldwide gaslighting via communication networks.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – PC 182 (Conspiracy) – PC 502, 632, 647(j)(3) as above – Civil: – Invasion of privacy, defamation
6. Brian Longbotham, Universal Studios, Modern Video Film, Rick Caruso, Corporations Asssociated like Starbucks, Coffeebean, Universal Studios, The Thousand Oaks Civics Art Plaza, and Countless Others
Situation: Contributing to the coordination of harassment, amplifying attacks through social/professional networks.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – If any member actively participated: PC 182 (Conspiracy), contributing to IIED. – Civil: – IIED, invasion of privacy, business torts
7. Starbucks Staff & Security (e.g., John Paul Naranjo, Starbucks Encino, Garrett) Situation: Physical and verbal attacks, staged assaults, provocation, spreading lies and disinformation with LAPD collusion.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – PC 240, 242 (Assault and battery) – PC 182 (Conspiracy) – PC 245 (Assault with a deadly weapon / K9 attack) – PC 646.9 (Stalking) – Civil Code § 51.7 (Hate crimes, violence motivated by protected characteristics) – Civil: – Assault, battery, false imprisonment, IIED
– Criminal: – PC 182 (Conspiracy) – PC 149 (Abuse under color of authority) – 18 USC § 242 (Federal, deprivation of rights under color of law) – PC 135 (Destroying/concealing evidence) – PC 136.1 (Witness intimidation) – Civil: – Bivens/federal civil rights claims, IIED, false arrest
9. Dr. Nathalie Krah, Dr. Alex Lazar, Psychiatry Situation: Collusion with law enforcement to discredit you, threats regarding medication, interrogating under false pretenses.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – PC 182 (Conspiracy, if proven) – PC 136.1 (Witness/victim intimidation) – Civil: – Medical malpractice, IIED, invasion of privacy
10. Bailey Bernard (Stalking and Assault) Situation: Assault, stalking, protected by LAPD in court.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – PC 240/242 (Assault/battery) – PC 646.9 (Stalking) – PC 182 (Conspiracy, if coordinated) – Civil: – IIED, assault, battery
11. Unnamed Neighbors, Civilians Situation: Ongoing stalking, aggression, coordination with police, psychological harassment (whistling, parked cars, mass repetition, mail theft).
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – PC 182 (Conspiracy) – PC 646.9 (Stalking) – PC 350 (Mail theft, if proven) – PC 602 (Trespassing, if entering property) – PC 422 (Criminal threats) – Civil: – Invasion of privacy, IIED, trespass, nuisance
12. Group Coordination (Gang Stalking, RICO Elements) Situation: Systematic, orchestrated psychological warfare, involving multiple parties and use of technology, business, and civilian networks.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – PC 182 (Conspiracy—multiple actors toward an unlawful end) – RICO statutes (18 USC § 1962 — federal racketeering laws, if criminal enterprise established) – PC 646.9 (Stalking) – PC 653m (Harassing phone/electronic communications) – PC 502 (Computer crimes/Cyberstalking) – Civil: – Civil conspiracy, IIED, invasion of privacy, defamation
General Criminal Statutes Referenced:
PC 182 — Conspiracy to Commit Crime
PC 187 — Murder
PC 664/187 — Attempted Murder
PC 646.9 — Stalking
PC 240/242 — Assault/Battery
PC 245 — Assault with Deadly Weapon/K9
PC 422 — Criminal Threats
PC 632 — Unlawful Eavesdropping or Recording
PC 502 — Computer/Data Crimes
PC 530.5 — Identity Theft
PC 647(j)(3) — Secret Recording
PC 149 — Abuse Under Color of Authority
PC 136.1 — Intimidating a Witness/Victim
PC 135 — Destroying Evidence
CIVIL CODE § 1708 — Right to Privacy/IIED
CIVIL CODE VIOLATIONS:
IIED — Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
Invasion of Privacy (Civil Code § 1708.8, § 43)
Defamation (Libel and Slander)
Civil Conspiracy
Civil Rights Violations (California Unruh Civil Rights Act, Civil Code § 51, § 51.7)
Business Torts (if commercial/competitive motives)
Listing of Key Persons, Situations, and Potential Violations
1. Jason Perelman (Brother) Situation: Manipulation from childhood, provoking, playing victim as part of early harassment.
Potential Violations:
– Civil: Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED, Civil Code § 43, § 1708) – Criminal: If part of a larger conspiracy—see PC 182 below.
2. Mike Huntley (Business Partner) Situation: Admissions of privacy violations, using the judicial system for harassment, direct threats, rerouting network switch for surveillance, organizing psychological attacks.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – Penal Code PC 182 (Conspiracy) – PC 646.9 (Stalking) – PC 422 (Criminal Threats) – PC 632 (Illegal recording/eavesdropping) – PC 502 (Unauthorized computer access/“hacking”) – PC 422.6 (Civil Rights Violations if hate/bias-motivated) – Civil: – IIED, invasion of privacy, Business & Professions Code § 17200 (unlawful business acts)
3. Family Members (Mother, Ron & Anita Perelman) Situation: Coordinating psychiatric ambushes, supporting false labeling as “crazy,” manipulating healthcare providers.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: Conspiracy if coordinating with others (PC 182), possible elder/child abuse statutes if manipulation was abusive. – Civil: IIED, invasion of privacy, possible defamation
4. Tim Thompson, Steve McPike, Rodie Morales, Bob Sandler, Val Morozov, other business/pool associates Situation: Surveillance, setups, feeding private info via spyware/trojans, gaslighting, introducing at-risk or illicit contacts, pushing setups in adult industry.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – PC 182 (Conspiracy) – PC 530.5 (Identity Theft, if misusing your personal data) – PC 502 (Computer crimes) – PC 632 (Eavesdropping) – PC 647(j)(3) (Secretly recording in hotel or private settings) – Civil: – Invasion of privacy, IIED, defamation
5. Traci Anna Koval, and Adult Industry Associates and the mass groups taking part
Situation: Involved in setups, surveillance, and worldwide gaslighting via communication networks.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – PC 182 (Conspiracy) – PC 502, 632, 647(j)(3) as above – Civil: – Invasion of privacy, defamation
6. Brian Longbotham, Universal Studios, Modern Video Film, Rick Caruso, Corporations Situation: Contributing to the coordination of harassment, amplifying attacks through social/professional networks.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – If any member actively participated: PC 182 (Conspiracy), contributing to IIED. – Civil: – IIED, invasion of privacy, business torts
7. Starbucks Staff & Security (e.g., John Paul Naranjo, Starbucks Encino, Garrett) Situation: Physical and verbal attacks, staged assaults, provocation, spreading lies and disinformation with LAPD collusion.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – PC 240, 242 (Assault and battery) – PC 182 (Conspiracy) – PC 245 (Assault with a deadly weapon / K9 attack) – PC 646.9 (Stalking) – Civil Code § 51.7 (Hate crimes, violence motivated by protected characteristics) – Civil: – Assault, battery, false imprisonment, IIED
– Criminal: – PC 182 (Conspiracy) – PC 149 (Abuse under color of authority) – 18 USC § 242 (Federal, deprivation of rights under color of law) – PC 135 (Destroying/concealing evidence) – PC 136.1 (Witness intimidation) – Civil: – Bivens/federal civil rights claims, IIED, false arrest
9. Dr. Nathalie Krah, Dr. Alex Lazar, Psychiatry Situation: Collusion with law enforcement to discredit you, threats regarding medication, interrogating under false pretenses.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – PC 182 (Conspiracy, if proven) – PC 136.1 (Witness/victim intimidation) – Civil: – Medical malpractice, IIED, invasion of privacy
10. Bailey Bernard (Stalking and Assault) Situation: Assault, stalking, protected by LAPD in court.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – PC 240/242 (Assault/battery) – PC 646.9 (Stalking) – PC 182 (Conspiracy, if coordinated) – Civil: – IIED, assault, battery
11. Unnamed Neighbors, Civilians Situation: Ongoing stalking, aggression, coordination with police, psychological harassment (whistling, parked cars, mass repetition, mail theft).
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – PC 182 (Conspiracy) – PC 646.9 (Stalking) – PC 422 (Criminal threats) – Civil: – Invasion of privacy, IIED, trespass, nuisance
12. Group Coordination (Gang Stalking, RICO Elements) Situation: Systematic, orchestrated psychological warfare, involving multiple parties and use of technology, business, and civilian networks.
Potential Violations:
– Criminal: – PC 182 (Conspiracy—multiple actors toward an unlawful end) – RICO statutes (18 USC § 1962 — federal racketeering laws, if criminal enterprise established) – PC 646.9 (Stalking) – PC 653m (Harassing phone/electronic communications) – PC 502 (Computer crimes/Cyberstalking) – Civil: – Civil conspiracy, IIED, invasion of privacy, defamation
General Criminal Statutes Referenced:
PC 182 — Conspiracy to Commit Crime
PC 187 — Murder
PC 664/187 — Attempted Murder
PC 646.9 — Stalking
PC 240/242 — Assault/Battery
PC 245 — Assault with Deadly Weapon/K9
PC 422 — Criminal Threats
PC 632 — Unlawful Eavesdropping or Recording
PC 502 — Computer/Data Crimes
PC 530.5 — Identity Theft
PC 647(j)(3) — Secret Recording
PC 149 — Abuse Under Color of Authority
PC 136.1 — Intimidating a Witness/Victim
PC 135 — Destroying Evidence
CIVIL CODE § 1708 — Right to Privacy/IIED
CIVIL CODE VIOLATIONS:
IIED — Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
Invasion of Privacy (Civil Code § 1708.8, § 43)
Defamation (Libel and Slander)
Civil Conspiracy
Civil Rights Violations (California Unruh Civil Rights Act, Civil Code § 51, § 51.7)
Business Torts (if commercial/competitive motives)
Summary Table of Police-Related Crimes in Your Case
Police Action
Code Violation(s)
Threats/Intimidation
PC 422, 136.1, 182, 149, 236, Fed 18 USC § 242
Coordinated harassment (Gang Stalking)
PC 182, 149, 646.9, 653m, Fed 18 USC § 241
Excessive force/assault in or out of custody
PC 149, 240, 242, 245, Fed 18 USC § 242
Evidence tampering/cover-ups
PC 135, 182, 118.1, Fed 18 USC § 1519
Judicial process abuse
PC 182, 134, 132, 137
Civil rights deprivations/hate crimes
PC 422.6, Fed 18 USC § 241, § 242, 42 USC 1983
Protecting criminal acts by others
PC 32, 182, 149
False arrest/unlawful detention
PC 236, Fed 42 USC § 1983
Use of civilians for proxy crimes
PC 182, 187, 664/187
Organized Listing By Person, Situation, and Laws Broken:
