Judge Stephen Marcus – “My Next Move Would Be To FORCE you out of your place
Woodland Oaks Homeowners Association, hoaorganizers.com involved since moving in with the Perelman family for 26 years of Daily STALKINGS linked to WORLDWIDE operations
Michael Patrick Huntley friend since 14, “World of Paranoia”, “I’ve given you enough rope to hang yourself with”, “Have a good life now”, “You had better live a careful life”, “Your too out of control for California”
Many other death threats and statements they are carrying out
Personal Pre-Meditation, Motive, to remove from society with LAPD and the Perelman Family out of HATE with their mass angry fear mongered, WORLDWIDE mobs with Public Nuisance and LABELING COVER UPS
Is this judicial misconduct, and grounds for case dismissal?
given everything that has happened and all the repeated occurrences of judicial misconduct? In this and every other trial against me, there have been angry mass mobbings—day and night—escalating nonstop since 1977.
Obviously, Attorney Shep Zebberman could have requested case dismissals each time something like this occurred in the courtroom, instead of displaying personal hatred and prejudice. For example, statements like “Kevin’s not a real Jew” have come from community members he has protected, allowing them to get away with their crimes while I am thrown under the bus.
Just before the verdict, Shep made statements such as, “You might get away with this,” while accepting $50,000, never asking what had actually happened, and essentially working on behalf of the prosecution. He actively refused to impeach witnesses or expose the coordinated stalking groups engaged in setup and frame-job operations, instead focusing on portraying me as mentally unstable and attempting to force fabricated mental illness or criminal labels on me.
On all occasions, he could have impeached the witnesses based on their STALKING, and HARASSING behaviors, or admitted video of them doing it. But he choose not to. Protected the WITNESSES who are STALKING.
Relevant Crimes and Penal Codes
Many actions connected to these events directed at me violate California law, including but not limited to:
- Penal Code §134 (Preparing False Evidence): For forging or fabricating mental health or criminal labels, or orchestrating false reports or records in court.
- Penal Code §132 (Offering False Evidence): Introducing knowingly false evidence through testimony, written records, or fabricated diagnoses.
- Penal Code §148.5 (False Reports to Authorities): Falsely reporting incidents or crimes to the police or court under oath or official capacity.
- Penal Code §136.1 (Dissuading a Witness or Victim): Intimidating, threatening, or manipulating witnesses, including pressuring me or others not to tell the truth.
- Penal Code §182 (Criminal Conspiracy): Coordinated efforts between attorneys, community members, and the Perelman Family to defraud or subvert justice.
- Penal Code §646.9 (Stalking): For ongoing harassment, intimidation, or mobbing—especially if it is shown this played a role in judicial proceedings.
- Penal Code §422 (Criminal Threats): Threats or intimidation to prevent me from defending myself or to manipulate court outcomes.
Grounds for Judicial Dismissal
Judicial misconduct—including demonstrated bias, failure to ensure a fair trial, refusal to impeach false witnesses, ignoring evidence of stalking and harassment, and failing to protect my rights—undermines the very foundation of due process. When an attorney or judge acts with prejudice, collusion, or willful indifference to misconduct (such as refusing to challenge fabricated evidence or labels, or ignoring ongoing harassment), it violates my constitutional and statutory rights.
A criminal defendant is entitled to a fair trial before an impartial and unbiased judge and jury. When misconduct contaminates the proceedings—through false evidence, perjury, witness tampering, or prejudicial actions by defense or prosecution—the process becomes fundamentally unfair. This creates clear legal grounds for dismissal.
In summary:
The recurring acts of judicial misconduct and related criminal acts—including, but not limited to, false evidence, criminal conspiracy, and systemic harassment—constitute clear grounds for case dismissal pursuant to California law and established standards of due process. That Shep Zebberman refused to act, especially in the context of possible outside influence by the Perelman Family and others, only further strengthens the case for dismissal and further review of criminal wrongdoing.
The Bigger Picture
Stepping back, it is deeply disturbing to consider how strange and unprecedented it is that I am being stalked, harassed, and hunted not only by individuals and community groups, Police, Psychology Community, The Perelman Families WORLDWIDE Defamation of Character which goes down to a very young age, but by elements of the judicial system itself. These campaigns—spanning decades and leaping across localities, organizations, and even international borders—have all been set in motion simply because I have sought the same fair and ordinary life as anyone else. The fact that the system meant to ensure justice and protect rights has instead joined in the escalation of harm raises urgent questions not only about my own case, but about due process, equality under the law, and the safety of anyone who dares to stand up for themselves with the First Amendment Freedom of speech. Especially within SELF DEFENSE. This goes far beyond a single legal dispute; it speaks to the failure of the very institutions that should stand for truth and justice.
Leave a Reply